Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61638 > unrolled thread

Odd behaviour?

Started byThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
First post2024-12-03 20:32 +0000
Last post2024-12-04 14:03 +0100
Articles 5 on this page of 25 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc

Contents

  Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 20:32 +0000
    Re: Odd behaviour? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-03 22:27 +0100
      Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-03 22:15 +0000
        Re: Odd behaviour? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-03 22:24 +0000
          Re: Odd behaviour? Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2024-12-04 12:40 +0800
            Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:24 +0000
          Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:23 +0000
            Re: Odd behaviour? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-04 18:41 +0000
              Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 07:59 +0000
                Re: Odd behaviour? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 11:34 +0100
                  Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 11:06 +0000
                    Re: Odd behaviour? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 12:19 +0100
                      Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 12:26 +0000
                        Re: Odd behaviour? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-05 13:41 +0100
                          Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 12:48 +0000
                            Re: Odd behaviour? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-05 13:12 +0000
                              Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 13:56 +0000
                              Re: Odd behaviour? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-05 15:24 +0100
                          Re: Odd behaviour? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 16:57 +0000
                            Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 18:02 +0000
            Re: Odd behaviour? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-04 19:41 +0000
              Re: Odd behaviour? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-05 08:37 +0000
      Re: Odd behaviour? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 10:29 +0100
        Re: Odd behaviour? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-04 12:42 +0100
          Re: Odd behaviour? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-04 14:03 +0100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#61703

FromPancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me>
Date2024-12-04 19:41 +0000
Message-ID<viqb9f$12h4a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61680
On 12/4/24 12:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 03/12/2024 22:24, Andy Burns wrote:
>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>> What I find puzzling is how it appears in the GUI but isn't on the 
>>> actual machine file system
>>
>> funky characters in filename?
>>
>> ls -la | cat -v
> 
> Nope. Still no sign
> 
> I think some part of the GUI environment builds a cache, and its in 
> that, but not in the real world so to speak
> 

Yes, that it what I think I have seen in Gnome Desktop and the Gnome 
Files App (file explorer) vs bash ls. I think I have seen behaviour that 
could only be explained by caching. I tested yesterday, but some kind of 
observer type behaviour was keeping everything perfectly and promptly 
synced.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61730

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2024-12-05 08:37 +0000
Message-ID<virooo$1gh6a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#61703
On 04/12/2024 19:41, Pancho wrote:
> On 12/4/24 12:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 03/12/2024 22:24, Andy Burns wrote:
>>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>>> What I find puzzling is how it appears in the GUI but isn't on the 
>>>> actual machine file system
>>>
>>> funky characters in filename?
>>>
>>> ls -la | cat -v
>>
>> Nope. Still no sign
>>
>> I think some part of the GUI environment builds a cache, and its in 
>> that, but not in the real world so to speak
>>
> 
> Yes, that it what I think I have seen in Gnome Desktop and the Gnome 
> Files App (file explorer) vs bash ls. I think I have seen behaviour that 
> could only be explained by caching. I tested yesterday, but some kind of 
> observer type behaviour was keeping everything perfectly and promptly 
> synced.
> 
> 
Well I rebooted the GUI and its gone...
I had a look through cajas configs but found no mention

-- 
Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get.
Mark Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61662

FromD <nospam@example.net>
Date2024-12-04 10:29 +0100
Message-ID<da2979f0-b01b-986f-014a-876c19597d9d@example.net>
In reply to#61642

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, Carlos E.R. wrote:

> On 2024-12-03 21:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> 
>> Linux Mint MATE here.
>> 
>> On my desktop is a file named TMPEEB.tmp
>> It shows up in the file browser as well
>
> https://vms.drweb.com/virus/?i=24143207
>
> But it attacks Windows, not Linux.

So it exploits chrome?

>> 
>> It doesn't show up in the console using ls.
>> If I try and delete it it says it doesn't exist.
>> 
>> Before I reboot the desktop does any one know whats going on?
>> 
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61671

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2024-12-04 12:42 +0100
Message-ID<eqr52lxpi4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#61662
On 2024-12-04 10:29, D wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-12-03 21:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>> Linux Mint MATE here.
>>>
>>> On my desktop is a file named TMPEEB.tmp
>>> It shows up in the file browser as well
>>
>> https://vms.drweb.com/virus/?i=24143207
>>
>> But it attacks Windows, not Linux.
> 
> So it exploits chrome?

Chrome is not windows.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61682

FromD <nospam@example.net>
Date2024-12-04 14:03 +0100
Message-ID<553a002e-91fe-fa8c-9d54-1d83cec701b3@example.net>
In reply to#61671

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Carlos E.R. wrote:

> On 2024-12-04 10:29, D wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2024-12-03 21:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Linux Mint MATE here.
>>>> 
>>>> On my desktop is a file named TMPEEB.tmp
>>>> It shows up in the file browser as well
>>> 
>>> https://vms.drweb.com/virus/?i=24143207
>>> 
>>> But it attacks Windows, not Linux.
>> 
>> So it exploits chrome?
>
> Chrome is not windows.
>

Does it?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc

csiph-web