Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #56292 > unrolled thread

Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature

Started byFritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202405.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
First post2024-05-07 14:40 +0200
Last post2024-05-08 11:54 +0200
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202405.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-05-07 14:40 +0200
    Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-07 15:45 +0200
      Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-07 21:03 +0200
        Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-07 21:59 +0200
          Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-08 11:54 +0200

#56292 — Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature

FromFritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202405.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
Date2024-05-07 14:40 +0200
SubjectRe: Yet Another New systemd Feature
Message-ID<71362256743962b72394883a66a5504a@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <...@nz.invalid> [LD]:
LD> Unfortunately, the existing tool [sudo] is far from perfect.

Will Deich has written a nice sudo alternative, called "super", with
lots of bells and whistles.

Its man page:
https://www.ucolick.org/~will/RUE/super/super.1.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#56293

FromMarc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Date2024-05-07 15:45 +0200
Message-ID<v1db91$1hnge$1@news1.tnib.de>
In reply to#56292
Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202405.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
wrote:
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro <...@nz.invalid> [LD]:
>LD> Unfortunately, the existing tool [sudo] is far from perfect.
>
>Will Deich has written a nice sudo alternative, called "super", with
>lots of bells and whistles.

And there is also doas, which less bells and whistles (which is what I
would want for a suid program), from the BSD world.

Greetings
Marc (who maintains sudo in Debian and is thus stuck with sudo)
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#56297

FromD <nospam@example.net>
Date2024-05-07 21:03 +0200
Message-ID<c7674554-bbb0-cd6d-86ee-2abc5ed0e3a6@example.net>
In reply to#56293

On Tue, 7 May 2024, Marc Haber wrote:

> Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202405.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
> wrote:
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <...@nz.invalid> [LD]:
>> LD> Unfortunately, the existing tool [sudo] is far from perfect.
>>
>> Will Deich has written a nice sudo alternative, called "super", with
>> lots of bells and whistles.
>
> And there is also doas, which less bells and whistles (which is what I
> would want for a suid program), from the BSD world.
>
> Greetings
> Marc (who maintains sudo in Debian and is thus stuck with sudo)

Hello Marc,

Since you are the expert witness... what is the point of OpenBSD:s doas 
instead of sudo? If the two were to battle to the death with the lirpa, 
which one would win?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#56301

FromMarc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Date2024-05-07 21:59 +0200
Message-ID<v1e16r$1jc7c$1@news1.tnib.de>
In reply to#56297
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>Since you are the expert witness... what is the point of OpenBSD:s doas 
>instead of sudo? If the two were to battle to the death with the lirpa, 
>which one would win?

runas is much simpler and thus has less attack surface. Sudo has a
complex parser of a historically grown configuration file format, a
plugin interface. I'd rather not have that in a suid root binary.

When I took over sudo maintenance in Debian, I was strongly
considering to migrate my own systems to doas because of the smaller
attack surface, but than decided that I need to eat my own dog food
and stayed with sudo.

Greetings
Marc
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#56312

FromD <nospam@example.net>
Date2024-05-08 11:54 +0200
Message-ID<f8207b24-ce45-99b6-7106-c0e90441b3b7@example.net>
In reply to#56301

On Tue, 7 May 2024, Marc Haber wrote:

> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> Since you are the expert witness... what is the point of OpenBSD:s doas
>> instead of sudo? If the two were to battle to the death with the lirpa,
>> which one would win?
>
> runas is much simpler and thus has less attack surface. Sudo has a
> complex parser of a historically grown configuration file format, a
> plugin interface. I'd rather not have that in a suid root binary.
>
> When I took over sudo maintenance in Debian, I was strongly
> considering to migrate my own systems to doas because of the smaller
> attack surface, but than decided that I need to eat my own dog food
> and stayed with sudo.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
>

Great! =) Thank you very much for the information Marc!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web