Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #28017 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "anon" <anon@anon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-08-29 08:34 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-09-17 01:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 355 — 52 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "anon" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-08-29 08:34 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-08-29 10:13 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-29 12:40 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-08-29 14:04 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-29 15:41 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-08-29 22:34 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-30 08:05 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rabid Robot <rabid@rob.ot> - 2019-08-30 10:05 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-15 15:04 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-15 16:20 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-09-15 18:26 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-15 22:39 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-15 22:43 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-09-16 08:26 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-16 08:52 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-16 11:28 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-16 17:32 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-16 11:10 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2019-09-19 15:26 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-19 08:29 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-09-17 05:05 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-17 12:48 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-09-19 10:35 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-09-19 08:31 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-03-25 03:14 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-25 13:13 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-25 20:57 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-25 16:25 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-26 00:36 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-03-26 01:31 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2020-03-25 23:02 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2020-03-26 04:34 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2020-03-26 00:30 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2020-03-26 07:45 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2020-03-26 07:47 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-26 08:18 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 09:57 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-26 12:23 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 04:35 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 13:18 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-26 21:44 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 01:42 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 19:28 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-26 19:55 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 22:21 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-26 22:49 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 12:46 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 13:01 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 16:15 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 17:48 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 12:47 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2020-03-27 21:00 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 22:18 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-26 12:22 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2020-03-27 03:10 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-03-26 07:33 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 13:17 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-26 21:32 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 21:52 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 16:05 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-26 23:45 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 19:29 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-27 08:06 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 12:48 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 03:04 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 22:25 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 05:47 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "lucent tpm" <telco@example.com> - 2020-03-27 16:53 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 18:05 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 17:19 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-27 08:03 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 12:50 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-03-27 06:59 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-27 12:52 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 21:54 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-29 22:46 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 01:34 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-29 19:14 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-30 04:17 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2020-04-03 21:26 +1100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-03 20:04 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2020-04-04 21:43 +1100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-04-04 05:53 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-04 11:48 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2020-04-05 21:09 +1000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-05 11:10 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 06:50 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-30 10:58 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-30 06:59 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Info <info@perfumeshotsale.com> - 2020-03-30 08:06 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-03-30 12:00 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-29 22:37 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-30 02:11 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-29 19:15 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-30 04:05 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 04:29 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 06:30 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-03-30 01:52 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Alogsa <alogsa.logistica@alogsalogistica.com> - 2020-03-30 08:05 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-03-30 11:31 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-30 13:01 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-03-30 11:05 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-03-30 09:26 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-30 17:51 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-03-30 12:03 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-31 00:06 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-03-31 08:55 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-31 03:18 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-31 04:16 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-31 04:11 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-31 04:45 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-03-31 08:03 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-31 15:26 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-31 18:55 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 05:59 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 06:30 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-30 07:28 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Contact <contact@larryshopping.com> - 2020-04-01 01:21 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 03:46 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 04:16 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 14:01 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 14:16 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-29 22:36 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 01:44 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-29 19:17 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 04:19 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-29 20:41 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 09:16 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@sympatico.ca> - 2020-03-30 11:47 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 13:12 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 19:59 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 20:53 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 21:57 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-30 19:19 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 13:13 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-31 05:04 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-31 11:21 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-31 17:25 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 20:01 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 20:53 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 21:59 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-03-31 13:35 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-31 12:02 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-31 11:25 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-03-31 17:13 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-31 12:09 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-03-31 18:51 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-31 13:44 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-04-01 13:37 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-12 10:35 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-13 02:22 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-12 22:50 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-13 09:41 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-04-13 07:51 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-13 11:45 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2020-04-13 14:11 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure mGhost <mGhost@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-13 15:50 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-13 18:21 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure mGhost <mGhost@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-13 17:44 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2020-04-13 13:58 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure mGhost <mGhost@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-13 18:15 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-04-13 14:01 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-13 20:40 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2020-04-13 22:56 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-15 12:06 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-15 11:36 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Chris Elvidge <chris@mshome.net> - 2020-04-16 11:22 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-16 11:20 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-04-16 09:08 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-16 14:50 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-04-16 13:49 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-16 13:16 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-16 20:56 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-04-17 01:43 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-04-16 15:27 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-18 14:56 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure felix@palmen-it.de (Felix Palmen) - 2020-04-16 17:44 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-16 16:26 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2020-04-16 12:37 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-04-13 14:29 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-04-14 08:18 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 12:50 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-04-15 09:59 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-13 09:39 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-13 19:44 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-14 00:16 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 03:39 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-13 21:59 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-14 11:24 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 12:35 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-13 22:04 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 12:47 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-04-14 14:15 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 15:05 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-15 11:43 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-04-16 13:31 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-14 13:09 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-04-14 12:20 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-14 05:47 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 12:48 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-14 21:10 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-14 23:54 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-15 01:06 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-04-15 13:39 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-04-14 08:40 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-01 09:37 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-01 08:55 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-01 11:13 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-01 20:40 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-31 21:38 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-01 13:39 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-01 13:51 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-01 20:42 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-02 09:19 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-02 13:24 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-02 12:10 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-02 21:56 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-04-03 08:42 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-03 08:05 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-03 09:13 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-03 08:15 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2020-04-04 01:16 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jack Strangio <jackstrangio@yahoo.com> - 2020-04-03 05:24 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-03 09:20 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-01 21:34 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-01 17:50 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-04-02 03:15 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2020-04-02 13:42 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Chris F.A. Johnson" <cfajohnson@cfaj.ca> - 2020-04-01 17:32 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-04-01 17:49 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-02 07:44 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2020-04-02 07:12 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-04-03 08:02 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2020-04-12 10:39 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-04-02 18:30 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 07:16 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-30 09:13 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 09:19 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 09:29 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2020-03-30 12:20 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-03-30 12:35 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 13:14 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-30 18:52 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-03-30 07:01 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-30 09:58 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-30 09:21 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 19:01 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 09:52 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 13:46 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2020-03-26 07:51 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-03-26 10:34 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 17:36 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 21:49 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-03-27 14:30 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 21:31 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 15:44 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 23:19 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 16:56 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-28 05:10 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 22:46 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-28 20:22 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-28 16:15 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-29 00:11 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2020-03-28 12:32 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2020-03-28 10:18 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-28 10:52 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 12:59 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 21:31 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 15:48 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2020-03-27 22:03 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 00:23 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 19:29 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 14:07 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2020-03-27 15:42 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 17:35 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 18:20 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-30 08:41 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Contact <contact@rockygoods.com> - 2020-03-30 11:47 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-26 13:54 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-26 15:44 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-26 12:19 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 13:46 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-26 12:55 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2020-03-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2020-03-26 16:05 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 00:02 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 01:29 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 17:57 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 21:56 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2020-03-26 21:13 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-27 00:13 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 16:08 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 23:20 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> - 2020-03-26 19:31 -0600
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2020-03-26 23:47 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2020-03-27 01:15 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-09-03 11:33 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-03 09:45 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2019-09-03 13:21 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-09-04 18:52 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-09-04 15:10 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-09-04 18:23 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-04 21:14 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-09-04 20:35 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-04 21:37 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2019-09-04 16:58 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-05 09:09 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rabid Robot <rabid@rob.ot> - 2019-09-04 16:45 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-15 15:07 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-15 15:06 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-15 22:32 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Rabid Robot <rabid@rob.ot> - 2019-08-29 17:07 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-08-30 12:31 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-08-30 17:25 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-30 18:46 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-31 04:08 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2019-08-31 03:34 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-31 10:02 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-31 10:41 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-08-31 16:15 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2019-08-31 13:34 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2019-08-31 13:59 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-08-31 21:36 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-09-01 09:59 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-09-01 14:44 -0400
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-15 15:01 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-08-29 12:34 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-16 20:05 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-08-29 21:40 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-29 16:03 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-08-30 00:59 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-16 20:11 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2019-09-17 05:42 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-08-30 00:34 +0200
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2019-08-30 13:41 +0100
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-08-29 20:02 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2019-08-29 15:43 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-29 16:12 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2019-08-29 21:29 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-08-30 14:02 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2019-08-29 21:47 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-30 01:03 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2019-08-31 00:52 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-31 11:17 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2019-09-01 00:16 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2019-08-31 01:03 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-08-31 10:56 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-08-31 11:37 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-08-31 11:30 +0000
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2019-09-16 20:20 -0700
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-09-17 01:45 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from failure "anon" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-09-15 17:31 -0500
Re: Unix at 50 How the OS that powered smartphones started from robert.wolfe@wildcat.uuhec.net (Robert Wolfe) - 2019-09-17 01:25 +0000
Page 15 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 Next page →
| From | "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 13:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <45e4d4c4fc82a810e601e6a6bf3b404d@remailer.privacy.at> |
| In reply to | #29330 |
> > In article <vlpskg-n6g.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> > "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> >> On 25/03/2020 11.14, Johann Beretta wrote: >>> On 9/15/19 3:20 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: >>> <snip> >>>> >>>> After looking around, I found what Linux was originally intended to do... >>>> Learn UNIX for free on a PC. Then the suggestion was to maybe be >>>> qualified for a UNIX job. Tho not all of linux is identically the same. >>>> >>> >>> Your comparison itself is false (although not deliberately of course). >> >> It is true that I installed Linux initially to learn Unix, as I could >> not pay a Unix system. Unix (and Linux) was used by my employer company. >> Perhaps on summer 1998. Seeing that a serious company was using Linux on >> important tasks told me that Linux was a serious thing, not a hobby. >> >> Then I liked it and kept it, eventually almost replacing Windows for me. >> >>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >> >> Typo? > > Nope, he said it right. > > >>> that's one of the reasons that Linux >>> usage has far surpassed UNIX installations. Paying for UNIX didn't give >>> you a system that was compatible with UNIX. There are way too many >>> official UNIXs. IRIX (SGI), HP-UX (HP), AIX (IBM), Solaris (Sun), Tru64 >>> (AlphaServer Systems) etc etc. All were developed by different >>> companies and all were different. But each an every one was an official >>> UNIX. >>> >>> Granted, most conformed to POSIX specifications.. mostly.. So they were >>> somewhat interoperable, but the UNIX ecosystem is a fucking mess. >>> >> >> Urinix
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 15:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0657bb35ec0ef20bcd4b4cba1097c8be@remailer.privacy.at> |
| In reply to | #29339 |
The frankenjohn remailer is on the loose again!
.....
C C /
/< /
___ __________/_#__=o
/(- /(\_\________ \
\ ) \ )_ \o \
/|\ /|\ |' |
| _|
/o __\
/ ' |
/ / |
/_/\______|
( _( <
\ \ \
\ \ |
\____\____\
____\_\__\_\
/` /` o\
|___ |_______|
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 12:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r5i6kq$f1j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29318 |
On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > > Typo? :-) No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 13:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5qkukg-0p3.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #29331 |
On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >> >> Typo? :-) > No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > > I still do not understand. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 12:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r5i8o0$to0$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29337 |
On 26/03/2020 12:46, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>> >>> Typo? :-) >> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >> >> > > I still do not understand. > UNIX covers a huge number of operating systems, in the same way that MS word covers a huge number of subtly different word processors, many of which are mutually incompatible -- “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” —Soren Kierkegaard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 15:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r5iive$b23$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29337 |
In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>> >>> Typo? :-) >> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >> >> > > I still do not understand. UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felidae [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_cat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 16:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r5ijt4$i1q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29345 |
On 26/03/2020 15:50, Rich wrote: > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>>> >>>> Typo? :-) >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >>> >>> >> >> I still do not understand. > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felidae > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_cat > Its worse in the case of MSword, because its supposed top be the same species! -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-27 00:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <66c4a53c14d8fee8316766bc8559180c@remailer.privacy.at> |
| In reply to | #29347 |
In article <r5ijt4$i1q$1@dont-email.me> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 15:50, Rich wrote: > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>>> > >>>> Typo? :-) > >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I still do not understand. > > > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felidae > > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger > > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_cat > > > Its worse in the case of MSword, because its supposed top be the same > species! You need to steal an updated version.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-27 01:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <faf0c1a7962d86123eb0e0d69218a3d0@remailer.privacy.at> |
| In reply to | #29366 |
In article <66c4a53c14d8fee8316766bc8559180c@remailer.privacy.at> "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote: > > > In article <r5ijt4$i1q$1@dont-email.me> > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > > On 26/03/2020 15:50, Rich wrote: > > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > > >>>> > > >>>> Typo? :-) > > >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> I still do not understand. > > > > > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > > > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > > > > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > > > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > > > > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > > > > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > > > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > > > > > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felidae > > > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger > > > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_cat > > > > > Its worse in the case of MSword, because its supposed top be the same > > species! > > You need to steal an updated version.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 17:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <12b273a6252ac1a33960775e59ce9d05@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #29345 |
In article <r5iive$b23$1@dont-email.me> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>> > >>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>> > >>> Typo? :-) > >> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >> > >> > > > > I still do not understand. > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felidae > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_cat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 21:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lghvkg-hda.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #29345 |
On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>>> >>>> Typo? :-) >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >>> >>> >> >> I still do not understand. > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way to phrase it. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 21:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r5j5t2$nl6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29358 |
In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>>>> >>>>> Typo? :-) >>>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I still do not understand. >> >> UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, >> but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. >> >> It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. >> tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. >> >> A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. >> >> Is a true statement when considering two different species of >> Felidae (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange > way to phrase it. Yes, it is a strange (unusual) way, that is purposeful. It is a play on words. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Play_on_words
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-27 00:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5ef133843207c6183a9ba85a9eaa8be9@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #29360 |
In article <r5j5t2$nl6$1@dont-email.me> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >>> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>>>> > >>>>> Typo? :-) > >>>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I still do not understand. > >> > >> UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > >> but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > >> > >> It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > >> tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > >> > >> A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > >> > >> Is a true statement when considering two different species of > >> Felidae (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange > > way to phrase it. > > Yes, it is a strange (unusual) way, that is purposeful. It is a play > on words. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Play_on_words
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 16:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <r5j947$gqs$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29358 |
On 3/26/20 2:56 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>>>> >>>>> Typo? :-) >>>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I still do not understand. >> >> UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, >> but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. >> >> It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. >> tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. >> >> A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. >> >> Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae >> (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way > to phrase it. > > > All that I have found was the UNIX specifications itself, and the requirements were rather vague. So each UNIX vendor did conform to that standard, but it was also very loose. No where does it require say a C compiler must reside at /usr/bin for example, nor other programs have to reside in /bin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c02435ae3ee036a3fcc9312215f127b4@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #29362 |
In article <r5j947$gqs$2@dont-email.me> anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> wrote: > > On 3/26/20 2:56 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >>> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>>>> > >>>>> Typo? :-) > >>>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I still do not understand. > >> > >> UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > >> but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > >> > >> It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > >> tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > >> > >> Ā Ā A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > >> > >> Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > >> (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way > > to phrase it. > > > > > > > All that I have found was the UNIX specifications itself, and the > requirements were rather vague. So each UNIX vendor did conform to that > standard, but it was also very loose. No where does it require say a C > compiler must reside at /usr/bin for example, nor other programs have to > reside in /bin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 19:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <r5jl0m$qfn$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #29363 |
On 3/26/20 4:20 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote: > In article <r5j947$gqs$2@dont-email.me> > anonlinuxuser <linuxuser@noone.net> wrote: >> >> On 3/26/20 2:56 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: >>>> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typo? :-) >>>>>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I still do not understand. >>>> >>>> UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, >>>> but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. >>>> >>>> It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. >>>> tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. >>>> >>>> Â Â A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. >>>> >>>> Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae >>>> (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). >>> >>> Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way >>> to phrase it. >>> >>> >>> >> All that I have found was the UNIX specifications itself, and the >> requirements were rather vague. So each UNIX vendor did conform to that >> standard, but it was also very loose. No where does it require say a C >> compiler must reside at /usr/bin for example, nor other programs have to >> reside in /bin. > Your message didn't get thru.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-26 23:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5992709c6da0cadc534e3e61977f5aed@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #29358 |
In article <lghvkg-hda.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>>> > >>>> Typo? :-) > >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I still do not understand. > > > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way > to phrase it. > > > > -- > Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-03-27 01:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5626a4fe7dd16fc066c929fb6766be0f@remailer.privacy.at> |
| In reply to | #29358 |
In article <lghvkg-hda.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > On 26/03/2020 16.50, Rich wrote: > > In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 26/03/2020 13.19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>> On 25/03/2020 19:57, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX, > >>>> > >>>> Typo? :-) > >>> No. in the same way that MS word isnt identical to MS word. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> I still do not understand. > > > > UNIX is a genus, the genus contains multiple, reasonably compatible, > > but also sometimes irritatingly incompatible, specific species. > > > > It is similar to the difference between the species Felidae [1] vs. > > tiger [2] and domestic house cat [3]. > > > > A Felidae is not identical to a Felidae. > > > > Is a true statement when considering two different species of Felidae > > (i.e., tiger vs. domestic house cat). > > Maybe, but saying "UNIX isn't even identical to UNIX" is a strange way > to phrase it. Was great for discussion. I learned something about Felidae!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-03 11:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2ec5edbcd0c312880a985d3eb15e34d7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #28027 |
In article <20190829154108.39a78ce8@WizardsTower> "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:04:05 -0400 > Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote: > > > Linux is some kind of fork from UNIX. > > Not a fork, it is a complete rewrite from scratch and shares no code. That's not entirely true. Appropriated from MINIX is more accurate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-03 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <20190903094528.36974bda@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #28082 |
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 11:33:32 +0200 (CEST) Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote: > In article <20190829154108.39a78ce8@WizardsTower> > "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:04:05 -0400 > > Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote: > > > > > Linux is some kind of fork from UNIX. > > > > Not a fork, it is a complete rewrite from scratch and shares no > > code. > > That's not entirely true. Appropriated from MINIX is more > accurate. > Absolutely false. Were that so then Linux would be a microkernel OS. It isn't. It is monolithic. It is also, Minix." -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS My other car is a Chandler MetalSmith Mark III
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web