Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #81967 > unrolled thread

Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year

Started byrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
First post2026-02-12 05:45 +0000
Last post2026-02-12 17:34 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 85 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-12 05:45 +0000
    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 02:05 -0500
      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-02-12 09:08 -0800
        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-12 19:05 +0000
        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 21:09 -0500
          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-13 06:08 +0000
            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-13 02:19 -0500
              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-13 18:30 +0000
                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-14 23:01 -0500
                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-15 06:18 +0000
                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-15 08:01 -0500
                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-15 17:27 +0000
                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-15 19:40 +0000
                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-15 20:43 +0000
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-15 23:12 +0000
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-15 21:30 -0500
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-16 07:39 -0500
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-17 10:14 +0100
                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 10:22 +0000
                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-17 14:16 +0100
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-26 09:25 +0000
                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-15 21:09 +0000
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-16 10:28 +0000
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-16 19:21 +0000
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-16 12:14 +0100
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-02-16 08:51 -0800
                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 10:15 +0000
                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-17 11:45 +0100
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-17 14:17 +0100
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-17 15:00 +0100
                                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-18 00:28 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-18 02:32 +0100
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-18 03:14 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-19 19:27 +0100
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-02-17 11:38 -0800
                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-17 14:17 +0100
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-17 15:03 +0100
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 14:10 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-18 00:33 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-28 20:48 +0100
                                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 02:25 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-03-01 07:50 -0500
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <goawy@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 18:34 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-03-02 07:22 -0500
                                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-02 18:58 +0000
                                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-03-02 15:05 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-03-03 02:12 -0500
                                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-03 18:58 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-03-06 00:17 +0000
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-03-07 08:05 +1000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-03-08 02:05 +0000
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 07:22 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-24 10:38 +0100
                                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 12:12 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-24 13:51 +0100
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 13:28 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-24 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-24 22:25 -0500
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-25 08:49 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-25 11:19 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:43 +0000
                                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-25 17:40 +0000
                                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-25 20:00 +0000
                                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-25 23:54 +0000
                                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-02-26 07:36 +1000
                                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 15:29 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 12:10 +0000
                                  Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 10:21 -0800
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-25 20:00 +0000
                                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 13:26 -0800
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-26 11:24 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-02-26 17:29 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-25 22:25 +0000
                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-02-17 11:35 -0800
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-16 20:36 +0000
                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-16 18:43 -0500
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-16 18:42 -0500
                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-16 07:37 -0500
                      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-15 19:16 +0000
                        Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-02-15 11:59 -0800
                          Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-15 22:30 +0000
                            Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-02-15 15:56 -0800
                              Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-15 22:28 -0500
                                Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-16 10:44 +0000
      Re: Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-12 17:34 +0000

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#81967 — Linux Mint may make fewer releases a year

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-12 05:45 +0000
SubjectLinux Mint may make fewer releases a year
Message-ID<mv57ogFg54lU1@mid.individual.net>
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2026/02/linux-mint-plans-longer-development-
cycle

Sounds like a plan to me. Too many distros release on schedule whether the 
upgrade is ready or not. The only time I had trouble with Fedora KDE, 
Plasma, and Qt weren't quite there. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#81970

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-02-12 02:05 -0500
Message-ID<zeKcnXfhA4xV5hD0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#81967
On 2/12/26 00:45, rbowman wrote:
> https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2026/02/linux-mint-plans-longer-development-
> cycle
> 
> Sounds like a plan to me. Too many distros release on schedule whether the
> upgrade is ready or not. The only time I had trouble with Fedora KDE,
> Plasma, and Qt weren't quite there.

   Good plan.

   To a degree, Linux has been taken in by
   the M$ "update fever" bullshit.

   A push for too-frequent updates can mean
   that not enough time to find/squash BUGS
   will be there.

   Take it a bit slower, get it RIGHT.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#81986

FromJohn Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Date2026-02-12 09:08 -0800
Message-ID<20260212090830.00007b03@gmail.com>
In reply to#81970
On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 02:05:42 -0500
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

> To a degree, Linux has been taken in by the M$ "update fever"
> bullshit.
> 
> A push for too-frequent updates can mean that not enough time to
> find/squash BUGS will be there.
> 
> Take it a bit slower, get it RIGHT.

"Release early, release often" is an ESR-ism, initially, and has deeper
roots in the FOSS world than MS-land (Redmond only adopted it in the
Win7 era) - but I agree, it's taken on the quality of a monomania in
the last decade-plus.

(This seems to be the way of things, with anything in the realm of soft-
ware development methodology; first it's a truism, then it's received
wisdom, then it's a religion, then it's an Industry, then something
else comes along and supplants it. Just look at what "agile" mutated
into, compared to the original manifesto.)

Obviously, there's cases and reasons to hustle critical fixes out into
the field as quick as you reasonably can - but the endless churn of new
releases under the Cult of the Constant Update is deeply annoying. At
least you can *generally* roll your eyes and disable notifications -
unless you're stuck with the Filezilla fascists.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#81990

FromLawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Date2026-02-12 19:05 +0000
Message-ID<10ml89a$1n020$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#81986
On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:08:30 -0800, John Ames wrote:

> Obviously, there's cases and reasons to hustle critical fixes out
> into the field as quick as you reasonably can - but the endless
> churn of new releases under the Cult of the Constant Update is
> deeply annoying.

This is why we have different Linux distros that follow different
upgrade strategies, with everything from major upgrades at less
regular intervals, up to rolling releases and complete bleeding-edge
must-have-the-latest-of-everything distros. This way, you can choose
the cadence that best makes you happy.

Linux is all about choice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82008

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-02-12 21:09 -0500
Message-ID<WN-dnSx7HoNwGhP0nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#81986
On 2/12/26 12:08, John Ames wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 02:05:42 -0500
> c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> 
>> To a degree, Linux has been taken in by the M$ "update fever"
>> bullshit.
>>
>> A push for too-frequent updates can mean that not enough time to
>> find/squash BUGS will be there.
>>
>> Take it a bit slower, get it RIGHT.
> 
> "Release early, release often" is an ESR-ism, initially, and has deeper
> roots in the FOSS world than MS-land (Redmond only adopted it in the
> Win7 era) - but I agree, it's taken on the quality of a monomania in
> the last decade-plus.
> 
> (This seems to be the way of things, with anything in the realm of soft-
> ware development methodology; first it's a truism, then it's received
> wisdom, then it's a religion, then it's an Industry, then something
> else comes along and supplants it. Just look at what "agile" mutated
> into, compared to the original manifesto.)
> 
> Obviously, there's cases and reasons to hustle critical fixes out into
> the field as quick as you reasonably can - but the endless churn of new
> releases under the Cult of the Constant Update is deeply annoying. At
> least you can *generally* roll your eyes and disable notifications -
> unless you're stuck with the Filezilla fascists.

   Mozilla Universe seems to push out a huge update
   pretty much once a week now. Is the base code THAT
   crappy ???

   Anyway, this issue is mostly 'psychological'. Some
   people brag in having THE latest versions of everything
   and some 'security' fascists think 'very latest' means
   'perfectly secure'.

   But, as said, the rush to be 'latest' MAY mean there's
   not enough time spent finding bugs.

   Hmmm ... my remaining Manjaro box WON'T update any more.
   There's an Intel Firmware bit that won't load and that
   damns updates for EVERYTHING. There may be a PacMan
   switch ... I'll have to look. The Manjaro isn't THAT
   damned old and I have it set up nicely so I don't
   wanna flush everything. Last update was about three
   months ago, so I should be good for awhile.

   Made a VM of Deb 'Trixie' to fool around with too.
   Had numerous probs with the last version when it
   first came out (stay-ahead fever ?) so I'm not
   gonna put Trixie on a real box too soon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82011

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-13 06:08 +0000
Message-ID<mv7te4Ftkj6U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#82008
On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:09:48 -0500, c186282 wrote:

>    Hmmm ... my remaining Manjaro box WON'T update any more.
>    There's an Intel Firmware bit that won't load and that damns updates
>    for EVERYTHING. There may be a PacMan switch ... I'll have to look.
>    The Manjaro isn't THAT damned old and I have it set up nicely so I
>    don't wanna flush everything. Last update was about three months ago,
>    so I should be good for awhile.

/etc/pacman.conf    IgnorePkg 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82012

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-02-13 02:19 -0500
Message-ID<Bfidnf_cpKwJTRP0nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#82011
On 2/13/26 01:08, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:09:48 -0500, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Hmmm ... my remaining Manjaro box WON'T update any more.
>>     There's an Intel Firmware bit that won't load and that damns updates
>>     for EVERYTHING. There may be a PacMan switch ... I'll have to look.
>>     The Manjaro isn't THAT damned old and I have it set up nicely so I
>>     don't wanna flush everything. Last update was about three months ago,
>>     so I should be good for awhile.
> 
> /etc/pacman.conf    IgnorePkg

   IF I can identify the specific package(s).

   It's gotten WORSE the past few days ... more
   and more "can't get there from here" shit.

   Best tact ... wait a few weeks and see if
   the Arch repos straighten themselves out.

   No, I'm not going to dig ten levels down into
   the app and config files. Too old for that shit.
   It either works pretty good or ....

   If not ... then ... well ... the box WILL be
   converted to Deb Trixie and I'll kiss Arch
   goodbye forever.

   On other subjects, STILL having probs with ffmpeg
   crashing or hanging or refusing to start. Tried
   numerous fixes, even an external watchdog pgm, but
   it's still not tame. For now, I'm rebooting the
   box three times a day. Errs seem to happen a bit
   after 8 hours.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82017

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-13 18:30 +0000
Message-ID<mv98u0F5vvtU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#82012
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 02:19:47 -0500, c186282 wrote:

>    Best tact ... wait a few weeks and see if the Arch repos straighten
>    themselves out.

Is it Arch or Manjaro's secret sauce? I'm not having a problem with 
EndeavourOS.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82028

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-02-14 23:01 -0500
Message-ID<T9Gcnd4eWbao2Az0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#82017
On 2/13/26 13:30, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 02:19:47 -0500, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Best tact ... wait a few weeks and see if the Arch repos straighten
>>     themselves out.
> 
> Is it Arch or Manjaro's secret sauce? I'm not having a problem with
> EndeavourOS.

   Don't have every Arch variant installed fer sure,
   just Manjaro.

   I've tried Endeavour however and it's pretty good.

   My GUESS, for the moment, is that this is a Manjaro
   issue, not Arch-in-General.

   However if the problem persists, well, the Big Flush
   and the box gets Trixie. I've already copied out all
   the important config files/settings ...

   Sorry, but I'm a Deb-o-Phile .....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82029

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-15 06:18 +0000
Message-ID<mvd6p1Fps8hU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#82028
On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 23:01:53 -0500, c186282 wrote:

>    Sorry, but I'm a Deb-o-Phile .....

I was a real Deb-o-Phile in college... When my father saw her he asked 
'Who is the little weasel?'  He wasn't being cruel since she was small, 
thin, and had pointed features. Unluckily for her it stuck and she became 
The Weasel.

I'm running Bookworm, sort of. Raspberry Pi OS is derived from it.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/iot/tutorials/blink-led

A little different approach. Might have been coincidental but the .NET 
application did blink the LED for a while before the Pi sort of locked up. 
I think it got hot an throttled.

I haven't played with it yes but I installed WiringPi.

https://github.com/WiringPi/WiringPi

There are also a couple of Python libraries. Raspberry's version GpioZero 
is the one they recommend but gpiod is a little faster. The problem with 
gpiod is the Pi 5 has a new southbridge structure so anything written for 
earlier versions has to be updated. gpiozero is included in the OS install 
and takes that into acount.

Note: this is for i/o programming on the Pi itself, not the pico.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82030

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2026-02-15 08:01 -0500
Message-ID<10msg39$3vqvf$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#82029
rbowman wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:

> On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 23:01:53 -0500, c186282 wrote:
>
>>    Sorry, but I'm a Deb-o-Phile .....
>
> I was a real Deb-o-Phile in college... When my father saw her he asked 
> 'Who is the little weasel?'  He wasn't being cruel since she was small, 
> thin, and had pointed features. Unluckily for her it stuck and she became 
> The Weasel.
>
> <snip>

Heh heh, took me a few seconds to grok that. In grade school we
had a similary-featured guy we called The Rat.

Anyway, my first distro was the old RedHat 6. Then I bought a
no-name laptop with Windows NT on it, and used that for awhile.
Then I tried to install RedHat. Partway through the screen would
blank and a weird glow would appear. (I later learned it was some
issue with the AMD K6 CPU.)

So I download Debian and burned an install CD. We were on a road
trip, so I spent a lot of time in the passenger seat getting it
installed, getting familiar with dselect, and getting the GUI
running. It was very absorbing.

I didn't try any other distro until Gentoo years later.

-- 
A guy walks into a bar, orders a beer, carries it to the bathroom and dumps it
into a urinal.  Over the course of the next few hours, he goes back to the bar
and repeats this sequence -- several times.  Finally the bartender got so
curious that he leaned over the bar and asked him what he was doing.
Replied the customer, "Avoiding the middleman."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82031

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-02-15 17:27 +0000
Message-ID<mmnkR.933587$urW7.266243@fx10.iad>
In reply to#82030
On 2026-02-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

> Anyway, my first distro was the old RedHat 6. Then I bought a
> no-name laptop with Windows NT on it, and used that for awhile.
> Then I tried to install RedHat. Partway through the screen would
> blank and a weird glow would appear. (I later learned it was some
> issue with the AMD K6 CPU.)
>
> So I download Debian and burned an install CD. We were on a road
> trip, so I spent a lot of time in the passenger seat getting it
> installed, getting familiar with dselect, and getting the GUI
> running. It was very absorbing.
>
> I didn't try any other distro until Gentoo years later.

When I first decided to set up a Linux machine, I went to the
local bookstore and perused the various Linux books which had
an installation CD included.  The book I liked best happened
to be by Patrick Volkerding, so my first distro was Slackware
3.5, which ran happily on a laptop with 48MB of memory and a
1.3G hard drive.

I stayed with Slack for some time, but the lack of package
management tools finally got to be too much.  Ubuntu 10 was
much easier to set up and maintain, but then they switched
to the Unity desktop so I bid it farewell.  I tried a few
other distros (e.g. Mint, CrunchBang) and desktops.  Blackbox
was nicely lean and mean - perhaps a bit too much so.  KDE
looked lovely, but was far too heavyweight; even worse, it
was constantly spitting messages out in a console window,
indicating it was doing too much behind my back for comfort.
Eventually I settled on Debian and Xfce.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Growth for the sake of
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  growth is the ideology
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  of the cancer cell.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Edward Abbey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82033

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-15 19:40 +0000
Message-ID<mvelpgF313qU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#82031
On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 17:27:46 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> When I first decided to set up a Linux machine, I went to the local
> bookstore and perused the various Linux books which had an installation
> CD included.  The book I liked best happened to be by Patrick
> Volkerding, so my first distro was Slackware 3.5, which ran happily on a
> laptop with 48MB of memory and a 1.3G hard drive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware#Birth

I must have caught it somewhere between the 24 floppies in 1993 and the 73 
in 1994, I've got an unopened box of Memorex 3.5" floppies -- $3.99 for 
10. No idea when I bought them but it was sometime after 2002. They may or 
may not have been cheaper in the '90s but 8 boxes, plus the time to ftp 
them down was a serious commitment.

I don't remember when CD drives became common. I have a '93 Compaq 
Concerto laptop with a floppy drive and an optional PCMCIA CD-ROM drive. 
Funny how that works. All my current laptops need an optional USB optical 
drive. I do have a big old one that has escaped turning into a Linux box 
that has a builtin drive. It's XP, I think.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82035

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-02-15 20:43 +0000
Message-ID<10mtb5h$ao7n$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#82031
On 15/02/2026 17:27, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-02-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, my first distro was the old RedHat 6. Then I bought a
>> no-name laptop with Windows NT on it, and used that for awhile.
>> Then I tried to install RedHat. Partway through the screen would
>> blank and a weird glow would appear. (I later learned it was some
>> issue with the AMD K6 CPU.)
>>
>> So I download Debian and burned an install CD. We were on a road
>> trip, so I spent a lot of time in the passenger seat getting it
>> installed, getting familiar with dselect, and getting the GUI
>> running. It was very absorbing.
>>
>> I didn't try any other distro until Gentoo years later.
> 
> When I first decided to set up a Linux machine, I went to the
> local bookstore and perused the various Linux books which had
> an installation CD included.  The book I liked best happened
> to be by Patrick Volkerding, so my first distro was Slackware
> 3.5, which ran happily on a laptop with 48MB of memory and a
> 1.3G hard drive.
I started with RedHat but Richard K had  always raved about Debian so I 
started with that, but got fed up with the fact that Stable was years 
behind the curve...so tried Ubuntu and didn't really like it and every 
was raving about MINT so I installed it and mostly it Just Worked.

That was about 13 years ago now


-- 
    "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have 
forgotten your aim."

  George Santayana

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82038

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-02-15 23:12 +0000
Message-ID<mvf26sF587pU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#82035
On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 20:43:28 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> I started with RedHat but Richard K had  always raved about Debian so I
> started with that, but got fed up with the fact that Stable was years
> behind the curve...so tried Ubuntu and didn't really like it and every
> was raving about MINT so I installed it and mostly it Just Worked.

I dropped Red Hat Linux in 2000 when they released the broken gcc 2.96. I 
liked KDE so I went with SuSE. My last Linux box at work was Debian since 
I needed a 32-bit OS and they were one of the few left. When you're 
dealing with legacy code years behind the curve helps. It wasn't so much 
running on Linux as the Windows code was tied to 32-bit third party APIs. 

Mint wasn't on my radar until it was mentioned in this group. I fired up a 
live session but didn't see anything special so didn't install it. Then 
the library project focused on Mint so I put it on a laptop. 

Ubuntu on the mini was a fluke but I've lived with it. I'm lazy and it has 
T-Bird set up for mail and Pan. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82040

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-02-15 21:30 -0500
Message-ID<z3adnS-LroraHA_0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#82035
On 2/15/26 15:43, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 15/02/2026 17:27, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> On 2026-02-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, my first distro was the old RedHat 6. Then I bought a
>>> no-name laptop with Windows NT on it, and used that for awhile.
>>> Then I tried to install RedHat. Partway through the screen would
>>> blank and a weird glow would appear. (I later learned it was some
>>> issue with the AMD K6 CPU.)
>>>
>>> So I download Debian and burned an install CD. We were on a road
>>> trip, so I spent a lot of time in the passenger seat getting it
>>> installed, getting familiar with dselect, and getting the GUI
>>> running. It was very absorbing.
>>>
>>> I didn't try any other distro until Gentoo years later.
>>
>> When I first decided to set up a Linux machine, I went to the
>> local bookstore and perused the various Linux books which had
>> an installation CD included.  The book I liked best happened
>> to be by Patrick Volkerding, so my first distro was Slackware
>> 3.5, which ran happily on a laptop with 48MB of memory and a
>> 1.3G hard drive.
> I started with RedHat but Richard K had  always raved about Debian so I 
> started with that, but got fed up with the fact that Stable was years 
> behind the curve...so tried Ubuntu and didn't really like it and every 
> was raving about MINT so I installed it and mostly it Just Worked.
> 
> That was about 13 years ago now

   I bought Slack and RH way way back, when they
   came on 5-1/4 floppies. Slack was OK, but RH
   was more complete and more generally friendly
   so I used it for a couple years. Then SUSE - which
   I still think is good but it's awfully "fat".

   Debian did it all simple and sane and wasn't nearly
   so fat so I went that way. Ubuntu was ok at the start,
   then got progressively weirder, more 'proprietary',
   more aggressive promos of Canonical add-ons to the
   point where it got very difficult to NOT include
   them at install.

   So, back to basic Deb and its closer relatives.

   Do have Manjaro on one box, but have been having
   update issues of late. If that keeps up it may
   have to go Deb.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82046

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2026-02-16 07:39 -0500
Message-ID<10mv36p$r07d$8@dont-email.me>
In reply to#82035
The Natural Philosopher wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):

> On 15/02/2026 17:27, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> On 2026-02-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> Anyway, my first distro was the old RedHat 6. Then I bought a
>>> no-name laptop with Windows NT on it, and used that for awhile.
>>> Then I tried to install RedHat. Partway through the screen would
>>> blank and a weird glow would appear. (I later learned it was some
>>> issue with the AMD K6 CPU.)
>>>
>>> So I download Debian and burned an install CD. We were on a road
>>> trip, so I spent a lot of time in the passenger seat getting it
>>> installed, getting familiar with dselect, and getting the GUI
>>> running. It was very absorbing.
>>>
>>> I didn't try any other distro until Gentoo years later.
>> 
>> When I first decided to set up a Linux machine, I went to the
>> local bookstore and perused the various Linux books which had
>> an installation CD included.  The book I liked best happened
>> to be by Patrick Volkerding, so my first distro was Slackware
>> 3.5, which ran happily on a laptop with 48MB of memory and a
>> 1.3G hard drive.
>>
> I started with RedHat but Richard K had  always raved about Debian so I 
> started with that, but got fed up with the fact that Stable was years 
> behind the curve...so tried Ubuntu and didn't really like it and every 
> was raving about MINT so I installed it and mostly it Just Worked.
>
> That was about 13 years ago now

I don't always use Debian, but when I do it's Debian Sid
(unstable).

    -- The Most Interesting Linux User in the World

-- 
You will be married within a year, and divorced within two.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82058

FromMarc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Date2026-02-17 10:14 +0100
Message-ID<10n1bgp$sldp$1@news1.tnib.de>
In reply to#82046
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>I don't always use Debian, but when I do it's Debian Sid
>(unstable).

There is nothing wrong with Debian sid. Someone needs to test it so
that we can put out a stable release with less bugs.

But if it breaks, you need to be able to fix it. And you shouldn't
complain if it breaks, it is supposed to. And it seldomly does.

Greetings
Marc
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82060

FromNuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-02-17 10:22 +0000
Message-ID<10n1fgv$1ljem$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#82058
On 2026-02-17, Marc Haber wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>I don't always use Debian, but when I do it's Debian Sid
>>(unstable).
>
> There is nothing wrong with Debian sid. Someone needs to test it so
> that we can put out a stable release with less bugs.
>
> But if it breaks, you need to be able to fix it. And you shouldn't
> complain if it breaks, it is supposed to. And it seldomly does.

I can't help but think there's a significant problem with your
affirmation - how can you want it to be used for testing in order to fix
issues before the software hits stable if you then tell its users not to
complain!?

-- 
Nuno Silva

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#82064

FromMarc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Date2026-02-17 14:16 +0100
Message-ID<10n1pn7$u3e8$1@news1.tnib.de>
In reply to#82060
Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 2026-02-17, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>I don't always use Debian, but when I do it's Debian Sid
>>>(unstable).
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with Debian sid. Someone needs to test it so
>> that we can put out a stable release with less bugs.
>>
>> But if it breaks, you need to be able to fix it. And you shouldn't
>> complain if it breaks, it is supposed to. And it seldomly does.
>
>I can't help but think there's a significant problem with your
>affirmation - how can you want it to be used for testing in order to fix
>issues before the software hits stable if you then tell its users not to
>complain!?

Maybe a language issue. I don't consider a bug report as a complaint.
A complaint is like "YOU broke my system and it took me two days and
my backup to fix it". A bug report is like "/usr/bin/foo crashes if
invoked with --bamboozle and --frobnicate, core dump attached".

Greetings
Marc
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web