Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #64371 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 389 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:10 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-16 05:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:18 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-17 07:35 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-17 12:20 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:46 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 07:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 03:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:17 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:37 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:39 +0100
Raspberry NAS, anyone? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 20:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:33 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 10:10 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:51 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:04 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:13 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-22 18:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-23 06:47 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 21:59 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 01:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-24 00:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:02 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:14 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 00:37 +0000
Maker spaces Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-23 02:17 +0000
Re: Maker spaces rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:50 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:38 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 01:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:32 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-24 06:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 09:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:36 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 20:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 05:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 03:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 09:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 08:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 09:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:06 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 10:15 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-21 09:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 19:42 -0500
Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-21 02:48 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 23:29 -0500
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-22 20:56 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 18:47 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-21 19:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:17 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 19:18 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:21 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 18:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 01:39 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 00:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:27 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 15:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:03 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 19:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 18:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:39 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:44 +0000
Political evolution (Libertarianism) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-26 00:36 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-26 05:31 +0200
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:36 -0500
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:44 +0100
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:33 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:55 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:32 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 03:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 03:49 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 21:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 18:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 00:42 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186283@ud0s4.net" <186284@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 00:03 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 05:53 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 01:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 18:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 02:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 21:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 03:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-29 04:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 06:02 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-29 07:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:14 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 16:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 01:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 05:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 01:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 10:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 05:08 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:43 +0100
Turn your Radio On Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-30 14:05 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:49 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:35 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:15 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:18 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 09:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:31 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 20:43 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-31 08:08 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-31 04:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 00:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 02:09 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:33 +0000
Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-31 16:48 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:03 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 20:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 05:05 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 17:40 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 08:14 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-01 19:47 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:57 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 20:13 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 00:24 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-02 06:10 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:41 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:20 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:27 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 21:00 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 17:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:18 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:54 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:49 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:22 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:42 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:43 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:56 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:55 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-04 00:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:35 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:31 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:59 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 01:11 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:49 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:28 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 22:54 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 11:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-02 04:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-31 18:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:09 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 21:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 12:52 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:05 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:26 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 21:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 03:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:16 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:21 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 13:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 19:45 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:38 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 03:13 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:00 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:12 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-25 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:31 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 22:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:20 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-18 07:45 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:08 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-20 23:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:26 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 08:14 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 16:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 09:00 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:56 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:04 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:28 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100
Page 8 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 20 Next page →
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 11:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1e73fa4a-77c8-5085-3587-2b74aae3fcfe@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64810 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:38:42 +0100, D wrote: > >> There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 >> coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the >> parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project > > There was much discussion over which state would be the target with New > Hampshire and Wyoming on the short list. I didn't expect success when New > Hampshire was chosen. I lived there until 1988 and while it's the best you > can do on the east coast it's surrounded by a sea of liberals. Have they managed to achieve anything major? I work with a guy at one of my customers who lives in NH. He says that yes, taxes are fairly low, but they take that back in fees instead, so not a huge difference in the end according to him. > Ken Royce championed Wyoming and wrote a novel, 'Molôn Labé!' about an > attempt to take over Wyoming. I think that scenario would have had more > success but libertarians do like their creature comforts. They want > freedom while retaining the ability to get their soy milk double grande > cappuccino from Starbucks. Haha, yes, that is certainly one species of libertarian. But then there are the cowboy liberatrians as well!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 20:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvnku5F6tn3U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64837 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:37:20 +0100, D wrote: > Have they managed to achieve anything major? I work with a guy at one of > my customers who lives in NH. He says that yes, taxes are fairly low, > but they take that back in fees instead, so not a huge difference in the > end according to him. Not really. afaik NH still doesn't have a sales tax or personal income tax. There was a degree of localism. If you had kids and wanted an excellent school system you picked a town with good schools -- and paid for it with property taxes. I don't remember any particular fees. There were some voluntary fees. For example you could pay a nominal sum, $5 iirc, to register a back country trip. No pressure and your choice but if you didn't pay it and ran into trouble call somebody who cares. Search & Rescue wasn't coming. The state was the last to officially recognize Martin Lucifer King Day. There was an existing state holiday, 'Fast Day', and they didn't think the state workers needed another day off. The unstated argument was why have a black holiday in a state with no blacks? They finally elected a Democratic female governor and the day was recognized. The DMV wasn't big on reciprocacy. What happened outside of NH stayed outside of NH as far as points on your license. It started to change with the influx of Massholes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 10:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <6942c485-ba59-4e3c-0d06-ec9abc624ba1@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64867 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:37:20 +0100, D wrote: > >> Have they managed to achieve anything major? I work with a guy at one of >> my customers who lives in NH. He says that yes, taxes are fairly low, >> but they take that back in fees instead, so not a huge difference in the >> end according to him. > > Not really. afaik NH still doesn't have a sales tax or personal income > tax. There was a degree of localism. If you had kids and wanted an > excellent school system you picked a town with good schools -- and paid > for it with property taxes. Interesting! Maybe my colleague lives in the wrong town. > I don't remember any particular fees. There were some voluntary fees. For > example you could pay a nominal sum, $5 iirc, to register a back country > trip. No pressure and your choice but if you didn't pay it and ran into > trouble call somebody who cares. Search & Rescue wasn't coming. > > The state was the last to officially recognize Martin Lucifer King Day. > There was an existing state holiday, 'Fast Day', and they didn't think the > state workers needed another day off. The unstated argument was why have a > black holiday in a state with no blacks? They finally elected a Democratic > female governor and the day was recognized. Let's see, maybe with Trump in power, they will de-recognize it again? ;) > The DMV wasn't big on reciprocacy. What happened outside of NH stayed > outside of NH as far as points on your license. > > It started to change with the influx of Massholes. Hah, law of nature. Once something becomes successful and people are drawn to it, it start to deteriorate. =(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 09:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vn7kic$mofk$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64890 |
On 27/01/2025 09:07, D wrote: > Once something becomes successful and people are drawn to it, it start > to deteriorate. =( Its a bit more nuances than that. Once something is successful - like today, social media - people who want to bend the world to suit them spend a lot of time and money infiltrating it, regulating it and emasculating it. Some populist movements are too big to (be allowed to) succeed. -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 00:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <slrnvpb0t9.10mt7.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #64806 |
On 2025-01-25, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 > coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the > parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. One seat does not do much. And getting 10 000 people to move is a tall order. You can probably register a party with fewer than that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 05:31 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <02bbpj93qtbtavrj38idv2c8li0247r7jn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #64814 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 00:36:57 -0000 (UTC), Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> wrote: >On 2025-01-25, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 >> coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the >> parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. > >One seat does not do much. And getting 10 000 people to move is a tall >order. You can probably register a party with fewer than that. What does this have to do with Linux? Find a more appropriate newsgroup for it. -- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-25 22:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <W0idndk3nM1fMAj6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64814 |
On 1/25/25 7:36 PM, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2025-01-25, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 >> coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the >> parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. > > One seat does not do much. And getting 10 000 people to move is a tall > order. You can probably register a party with fewer than that. Long back there was an amusing Monty Python about British politics. We saw the "Silly Party" and "Sensible Party" and a dozen others all in the race. In the USA, you pretty much stick to the name of the TWO main parties. However what you DO with that is up to you. Trump and like-minded turned the GOP into the "MAGA Party". The lefties turned the Dems into the "Wokie Freaks Party". No real need for 99 other parties. In a Winner-Takes-All system they'll never get into govt anyhow. Keeps it all much simpler. I think there's occasionally been a Libertarian Party rep in the US Congress, usually from Alaska. Nearest thing now would be Rand Paul, but he's officially a Republican.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 19:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <lvngi3F6tn3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64825 |
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 22:36:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > I think there's occasionally been a Libertarian Party rep in the US > Congress, usually from Alaska. Nearest thing now would be Rand Paul, > but he's officially a Republican. Justin Amash from Michigan is the one and only. He was a Republican, and then an Independent, and finally joined the LP. I don't know the timing but he may have been elected as a Republican and switched while in office. He did not play well with Republicans unlike Paul.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 11:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <707fdbed-7a46-c8c2-e7e4-64cad4f097c7@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64814 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2025-01-25, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 >> coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the >> parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. > > One seat does not do much. And getting 10 000 people to move is a tall > order. You can probably register a party with fewer than that. I think the majority now is 3 or 4 seats. Sweden is a very divided country, so usually the difference is only a few seats. It definitely can make a difference. There is no limit for starting a political party in sweden. Anyone can do it. But in order to get automatically placed as an option by the election booths you need to have reached at least 1% in the two previous elections. If you haven't reached that size, you have to travel around sweden and hand out your election papers yourself. There are also blank papers where you can manually fill in your party, that's always an option for all parties regardless of size.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 19:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <lvnh0sF6tn3U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64839 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:44:28 +0100, D wrote: > There is no limit for starting a political party in sweden. Anyone can > do it. But in order to get automatically placed as an option by the > election booths you need to have reached at least 1% in the two previous > elections. > > If you haven't reached that size, you have to travel around sweden and > hand out your election papers yourself. There are also blank papers > where you can manually fill in your party, that's always an option for > all parties regardless of size. That's similar to the US except its on the state level. Then there are the dirty tricks. One year the Libertarian candidate asked people not to vote for him. The Democrats had been promoting him knowing that any votes for him would come from Republican leaning voters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 09:55 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) |
| Message-ID | <552b2501-f404-2eba-8518-a8f031deab81@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64860 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:44:28 +0100, D wrote: > >> There is no limit for starting a political party in sweden. Anyone can >> do it. But in order to get automatically placed as an option by the >> election booths you need to have reached at least 1% in the two previous >> elections. >> >> If you haven't reached that size, you have to travel around sweden and >> hand out your election papers yourself. There are also blank papers >> where you can manually fill in your party, that's always an option for >> all parties regardless of size. > > That's similar to the US except its on the state level. Then there are the > dirty tricks. One year the Libertarian candidate asked people not to vote > for him. The Democrats had been promoting him knowing that any votes for > him would come from Republican leaning voters. > Ahhh... yes, well, isn't politics the art of dirty tricks? ;) I can add that in sweden, once you hit 4% you get into the partliament (I think you get 15 or 20 seats at 4% level) and then the money starts to flow. Naturally all parties who make it take good care of themselves, so you get like a "parliament" grant or something once you get in. Traditionally the socialists complemented their income by selling lottery tickets to people. It was a huge scandal a few months ago when it came out that the socialist party used highly aggressive sales tactics and foreign call centers to manipulate elderly into buying their lottery tickets. They said they will give up the practice, but I'm uncertain. Too much money at stake. They will probably just wait for the media to go away and continue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-25 21:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <BIecndu1efInAwj6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64806 |
On 1/25/25 5:38 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 10:44:53 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> Very interesting. There is a libertarian party in sweden. I voted for >>> them once or twice in my youth, I think they got 3000 and 3800 votes or >>> so in those elections, and then I never bothered since they never showed >>> much interest in actually growing, but was more a kind of discussion >>> club. >> >> The LP in the US tends to be a mixed bag of nuts that are extremely naive >> about their fellow Amurricans. They manage to maintain ballot access in >> this state. >> >> That's another impediment to third parties. Ballot access is determined >> state by state and often is a Catch 22. If you received a certain number >> of votes you will be on the next ballot. If you have never been on the >> ballot, start collecting signatures and hope for the best. >> > > There is some obscure rule in sweden that in theory would allow 10 000 > coordinated people to move to the same region and get a seat in the > parliament. I always wonder why no one ever tried it. It can be done in the USA as well, indeed the rapid rise of the 'southern red states' is a more general example. As to why it's rarely so deliberate, well, people don't like to pull up stakes and move.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 03:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvlop6Fsla4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64818 |
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 21:32:27 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > It can be done in the USA as well, indeed the rapid rise of the > 'southern red states' is a more general example. As to why it's > rarely so deliberate, well, > people don't like to pull up stakes and move. The Republicans prided themselves on their 'southern strategy' but they couldn't have pulled it off without the help, however unforeseen, of the blacks. There's nothing like a series of race riots in major US cities to get peoples attention. Point at LBJ and his civil rights legislation and the former white Democrats are going to be changing their registration. The Democrats have managed to do it to themselves again. You can only promote DEI, ignore illegal immigration, promote transgenders to public positions, ignore a senile executive and his family of grifters, and the like before the slumbering masses say 'Okay, that's enough.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 03:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1Wadnbe7od-Cagj6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64824 |
On 1/25/25 10:33 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 21:32:27 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> It can be done in the USA as well, indeed the rapid rise of the >> 'southern red states' is a more general example. As to why it's >> rarely so deliberate, well, >> people don't like to pull up stakes and move. > > The Republicans prided themselves on their 'southern strategy' but they > couldn't have pulled it off without the help, however unforeseen, of the > blacks. There's nothing like a series of race riots in major US cities to > get peoples attention. Point at LBJ and his civil rights legislation and > the former white Democrats are going to be changing their registration. Well .... the 60s "race riots" are kinda HISTORY now. The more recent stuff - Rodney King and such - are mostly MSM constructions - but now the MSM is collapsing. > The Democrats have managed to do it to themselves again. You can only > promote DEI, ignore illegal immigration, promote transgenders to public > positions, ignore a senile executive and his family of grifters, and the > like before the slumbering masses say 'Okay, that's enough.' I've heard it from multiple "previous liberals" ... the DNC became the "Party Of Freaks". This DOOMED them. "Wokie" is abberant, NOT remotely mainstream USA. It had a very short shelf life - then a huge counter-response.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 21:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvnmrsF805rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64829 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 03:49:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > I've heard it from multiple "previous liberals" ... > the DNC became the "Party Of Freaks". This DOOMED them. > > "Wokie" is abberant, NOT remotely mainstream USA. It had a very short > shelf life - then a huge counter-response. The funny thing the freaks were always there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LemG0cvc4oU "Girls will be boys and boys will be girls It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world" That was a hit over 50 years ago and still gets a lot of airplay. The difference is the boys who wanted to be girls didn't want to compete on the girls' swim team and get patted on the head for their efforts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-26 18:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ya6cnQDRWsUtWAv6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64868 |
On 1/26/25 4:13 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 03:49:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> I've heard it from multiple "previous liberals" ... >> the DNC became the "Party Of Freaks". This DOOMED them. >> >> "Wokie" is abberant, NOT remotely mainstream USA. It had a very short >> shelf life - then a huge counter-response. > > The funny thing the freaks were always there. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LemG0cvc4oU > > "Girls will be boys and boys will be girls > It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world" > > That was a hit over 50 years ago and still gets a lot of airplay. The > difference is the boys who wanted to be girls didn't want to compete on > the girls' swim team and get patted on the head for their efforts. I remember when it was new :-) Anyhow, I don't care about the freaks, they're just fine. Wokie decided they should always be In Charge, Just Because, More Equal. That I don't like.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 00:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvo349F9nquU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64870 |
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 18:30:55 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 1/26/25 4:13 PM, rbowman wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 03:49:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> I've heard it from multiple "previous liberals" ... >>> the DNC became the "Party Of Freaks". This DOOMED them. >>> >>> "Wokie" is abberant, NOT remotely mainstream USA. It had a very >>> short shelf life - then a huge counter-response. >> >> The funny thing the freaks were always there. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LemG0cvc4oU >> >> "Girls will be boys and boys will be girls It's a mixed up, muddled up, >> shook up world" >> >> That was a hit over 50 years ago and still gets a lot of airplay. The >> difference is the boys who wanted to be girls didn't want to compete on >> the girls' swim team and get patted on the head for their efforts. > > I remember when it was new It was a catchy tune and I didn't put any more significance in the lyrics other than that's how things were. Lou Reed's 'Walk on the Wild Side' covered the same ground and more and charted fairly well. I was in Omaha on business in '70 when 'Lola' was getting a lot of airplay back east. I called in a request and the DJ said that wasn't popular anymore and I should pick something else. I don't know if he'd never heard of it, was thinking about another song from the '50s, or was subtly saying they didn't play that kind of stuff in Omaha. I wasn't in Omaha that long but I'm guessing if you knew the right spot... When I moved to Springfield MA in the early '70s I was out investigating the bar scene downtown. I walked into one and asked for a whiskey water. Finished that and I was thirsty so I asked for a beer. 'Oh, you're AC-DC' said the bartender. I looked a little closer at the couples sitting at the tables. The lighting was barroom dim but I thought I could detect 5 o'clock shadow on some of the girls. I finished my beer, tipped the bartender and left. No harm, no foul and I took the joint off my list of potential hangouts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186283@ud0s4.net" <186284@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 00:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8RucnQnhsYgzjgr6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64872 |
On 1/26/25 7:42 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 18:30:55 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 1/26/25 4:13 PM, rbowman wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 03:49:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> I've heard it from multiple "previous liberals" ... >>>> the DNC became the "Party Of Freaks". This DOOMED them. >>>> >>>> "Wokie" is abberant, NOT remotely mainstream USA. It had a very >>>> short shelf life - then a huge counter-response. >>> >>> The funny thing the freaks were always there. >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LemG0cvc4oU >>> >>> "Girls will be boys and boys will be girls It's a mixed up, muddled up, >>> shook up world" >>> >>> That was a hit over 50 years ago and still gets a lot of airplay. The >>> difference is the boys who wanted to be girls didn't want to compete on >>> the girls' swim team and get patted on the head for their efforts. >> >> I remember when it was new > > It was a catchy tune and I didn't put any more significance in the lyrics > other than that's how things were. Lou Reed's 'Walk on the Wild Side' > covered the same ground and more and charted fairly well. I think the only reason they got air was because the Old Squares didn't remotely understand what they were talking about :-) Didn't even realize what "Rock & Roll" meant. > I was in Omaha on business in '70 when 'Lola' was getting a lot of airplay > back east. I called in a request and the DJ said that wasn't popular > anymore and I should pick something else. I don't know if he'd never heard > of it, was thinking about another song from the '50s, or was subtly saying > they didn't play that kind of stuff in Omaha. > > I wasn't in Omaha that long but I'm guessing if you knew the right spot... > When I moved to Springfield MA in the early '70s I was out investigating > the bar scene downtown. I walked into one and asked for a whiskey water. > Finished that and I was thirsty so I asked for a beer. 'Oh, you're AC-DC' > said the bartender. I looked a little closer at the couples sitting at the > tables. The lighting was barroom dim but I thought I could detect 5 > o'clock shadow on some of the girls. I finished my beer, tipped the > bartender and left. No harm, no foul and I took the joint off my list of > potential hangouts. ANYway ... the freaks must not be "more equal". That's anti-America fer sure. Trump is restoring "merit" - which is what everybody everywhere needs. Hey, the 'nurse' that schedules my med appts and such DOES get a 5-o-clock shadow ... but 'she' is good at it so I don't care in the least.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 05:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvolbmFcivvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64875 |
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:03:41 -0500, 186283@ud0s4.net wrote: > I think the only reason they got air was because the Old Squares > didn't remotely understand what they were talking about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8tdmaEhMHE Somebody had to have known... otoh the Old Squares thought 'Puff the Magic Dragon' was about marijuana. I thought it was a somewhat sad song about a dragon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-7WpPk00jA Now that was about marijuana. Axton spent his final years living down the valley and is buried in the Hamilton MT cemetery. He did love his weed and was busted before it became legal in the state. Steppenwolf got a lot of miles out of the song. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNWw2NFo_ec Then there's the moment you realize you're utterly screwed. You've got to listen to the lyrics. A friend of mine liked Jeff Buckley's version of 'Hallelujah' and the kids from his church sang it at his funeral. They heard the hallelujah and some biblical references but I don't think it all sank in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYiMJ2bC65A& "maybe there is a god above, but all I learned from love is how to shoot someone who outdrew you." Lang is a good example. When she game out as a lesbian people shrugged and said 'Yeah, okay'. She's also a vegetarian and when she started her anti- meat campaign her name turned to shit in Alberta and Montana. Running down perfectly good steaks, there's something to get upset about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 01:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9ducnXj9pdrfuwr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64877 |
On 1/27/25 12:53 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:03:41 -0500, 186283@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> I think the only reason they got air was because the Old Squares >> didn't remotely understand what they were talking about > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8tdmaEhMHE > > Somebody had to have known... > > otoh the Old Squares thought 'Puff the Magic Dragon' was about marijuana. > I thought it was a somewhat sad song about a dragon. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-7WpPk00jA "Puff" was an incredibly depressing song. No, it wasn't about weed ....... > Now that was about marijuana. Axton spent his final years living down the > valley and is buried in the Hamilton MT cemetery. He did love his weed and > was busted before it became legal in the state. > > Steppenwolf got a lot of miles out of the song. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNWw2NFo_ec Keep yer hands off the grass Sam ... :-) Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air SINCE the 60s. And who plays Zappa music ? > Then there's the moment you realize you're utterly screwed. > > You've got to listen to the lyrics. A friend of mine liked Jeff Buckley's > version of 'Hallelujah' and the kids from his church sang it at his > funeral. They heard the hallelujah and some biblical references but I > don't think it all sank in. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYiMJ2bC65A& > > "maybe there is a god above, > but all I learned from love > is how to shoot someone who outdrew you." > > Lang is a good example. When she game out as a lesbian people shrugged and > said 'Yeah, okay'. She's also a vegetarian and when she started her anti- > meat campaign her name turned to shit in Alberta and Montana. Running down > perfectly good steaks, there's something to get upset about. You can find un-PC music everywhere since the mid 50s on. "Rock Around The Clock" was NOT about music or dancing :-) Even some earlier music had 'subversive' undertones. I've no interest in Veggies ... operating under a pointless manufactured 'principle' IMHO. Hey, the turnip YOU eat is one the goats WON'T be able to eat - so you're killing them, right ? :-) Just dig yerself a shallow grave and lie in it ... food for the worms ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web