Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #77438
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Simple Programming Challenge |
| Date | 2025-11-13 00:00 +0000 |
| Organization | terraraq NNTP server |
| Message-ID | <wwvecq2vm1n.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <5L1RQ.59910$3VN7.27458@fx41.iad> <project-20251112171620@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <18774fee1aa33cb0$22907$3467166$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10f2g5o$1jjgu$1@dont-email.me> <10f2gd4$1jjgu$2@dont-email.me> |
Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> writes:
> On 11/12/25 17:29, Pancho wrote:
>> On 11/12/25 16:41, Joe Fantastic wrote:
>>> Too many additions.
>>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> int main()
>> {
>> int i=1;
>> while (i < 990)
>> {
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Buzz"); i++;
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%s\n", "Buzz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "FizzBuzz"); i++;
>> }
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Buzz"); i++;
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%d\n", i++);
>> printf( "%s\n", "Fizz"); i++;
>> printf( "%s\n", "Buzz"); i++;
>> }
l-)
> whoops 12 and 13 the wrong way around. No task is too small, for me to
> fuck up :o).
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void) {
static const char *f[] = {
"fizzbuzz\n",
"buzz\n",
"fizz\n",
"%d\n",
};
unsigned r = 2;
for(int i = 1; i <= 1000; i++) {
printf(f[!(r & 4681) + (!(r & 1057) << 1)], i);
r <<= 1;
r |= r >> 15;
}
return 0;
}
If you hate additions then ‘+’ in the middle could be ‘|’, but x86-64
GCC doesn’t spot the optimization to lea if you do tha
--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Simple Programming Challenge Joe Fantastic <jf@linux.rocks> - 2025-11-12 15:19 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 10:31 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 08:07 -0800
Re: Simple Programming Challenge ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-11-12 16:18 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Joe Fantastic <jf@linux.rocks> - 2025-11-12 16:41 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-12 17:29 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-12 17:33 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-13 00:00 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-13 10:45 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-12 23:30 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-11-13 13:24 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@gmx.de> - 2025-11-13 16:16 +0100
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202511.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2025-11-12 18:37 +0100
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 20:05 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 15:30 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 20:50 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> - 2025-11-12 17:22 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-12 23:57 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-12 23:24 +0000
csiph-web