Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #77475
| From | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Simple Programming Challenge |
| Date | 2025-11-13 13:24 +0000 |
| Organization | Stefan Ram |
| Message-ID | <benchmark-20251113142130@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <18774b74533f13ac$14097$3668313$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <5L1RQ.59910$3VN7.27458@fx41.iad> <project-20251112171620@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <18774fee1aa33cb0$22907$3467166$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
Joe Fantastic <jf@linux.rocks> wrote or quoted:
>Too many additions.
I know that terminal output is slow, so I just wrote to memory
and have one single terminal output at the end. However, for my
benchmark I used ">/dev/nul" and found out that:
- My program is much slower than the C programs shown here.
- The most dramatic speed-up resulted from using C instead of C++.
(So the "++" in "C++" actually constitute the "too many additions".)
- The "strength reduction" avoiding "%" also slowed down my program
a bit.
- But even after I ported my program to C and improved it a bit, the
programs that just call "printf" multiple times are still faster.
- measured using:
/usr/bin/time -f "%U" bash -c 'for i in {1..1000}; do ./a.out > /dev/null 2>&1; done'
.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Simple Programming Challenge Joe Fantastic <jf@linux.rocks> - 2025-11-12 15:19 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 10:31 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 08:07 -0800
Re: Simple Programming Challenge ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-11-12 16:18 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Joe Fantastic <jf@linux.rocks> - 2025-11-12 16:41 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-12 17:29 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-12 17:33 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-13 00:00 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-13 10:45 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-12 23:30 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-11-13 13:24 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@gmx.de> - 2025-11-13 16:16 +0100
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202511.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2025-11-12 18:37 +0100
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 20:05 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 15:30 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 20:50 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> - 2025-11-12 17:22 +0000
Re: Simple Programming Challenge c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-12 23:57 -0500
Re: Simple Programming Challenge Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-12 23:24 +0000
csiph-web