Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1824
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Date | Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:19:56 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 12 |
| Message-ID | <sqt8f8-3h6.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <39f71fac-d3bf-4144-a7ee-5d71ebd9c08f@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <oti2f8-0lg.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <f51dbf4e-9beb-4e76-8b6d-cfeddd7f223b@fq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <98bl3nFcglU6@mid.individual.net> <tso7f8-5j8.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> <98din4FcglU7@mid.individual.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6oIlEBqCjOm0MjsSUEk5CA"; logging-data="15875"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/b6UNAbZvN5vMfPCKVueL8LlAZhnoRj6s=" |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.10 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:fd5ztr/v6DCYDjYw4zbAZ585WlM= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:1824 |
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.misc
Show key headers only | View raw
General Schvantzkoph wrote: > Is OpenVZ an active project? It doesn't seem to be in the repos for Fedora > 14 or SL6 and the OpenVZ wiki only mentions Fedora 5 & 6 and CentOS 4 and > 5, no mention of a recent distro. http://wiki.openvz.org/Main_Page Looks pretty alive... It's certainly an option on loads of hosting providers as a cheaper alternative to KVM or Xen. -- Tim Watts
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best practice Linux support vendors? snorble <snorble@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-13 19:12 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-14 08:36 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? snorble <snorble@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-07-15 18:35 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-15 20:09 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-16 07:49 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-16 13:40 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-16 18:19 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2011-07-17 03:44 +0200
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? aw@anhrefn.saar.de - 2011-07-14 15:25 +0200
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-07-14 14:13 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-07-14 19:01 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-07-14 14:51 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-07-14 14:34 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2011-07-14 17:32 -0500
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-15 06:59 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-15 06:57 +0100
csiph-web