Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1258
| From | Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Archive 20GB? |
| Date | 2011-05-26 03:19 +0000 |
| Organization | none-at-all |
| Message-ID | <slrnitrhlu.cj.spamtrap42@one.localnet> (permalink) |
| References | <4ddab8bf$0$2126$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <4ddbffc7$0$2187$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <15jpt65srq23r96e3mijd5nb06v48hrtla@4ax.com> <irj3el$gr0$1@matrix.darkstorm.co.uk> <4ddd14e4$0$24141$a729d347@news.telepac.pt> |
On 2011-05-25, Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> wrote: > Tony wrote: > >> Estimate based on any evidence? Or a gut feel? > > I've had a couple of boxes of CD-Rs fail after being stored for about 6 > years. These weren't cheap chinese store knock-off CD-Rs. They were > stored in air-tight containers and away from sunlight, which is supposed > to be the right way of storing optical media. Granted, not all 50 CD-Rs > failed, but a considerable number of them failed, and I was left without > any way to recover that data after 6 years. > > This case was a personal anecdote which can't possibly be generalized to > every case where someone stored information on CD-Rs, let alone DVDs. > Yet, this is also a bit beyond the "gut feeling" territory. > > > Rui Maciel While I don't remember the exact source, I have read that DVD+/-Rs use a different, much more stable, dye than CD-Rs and should last much longer. -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@jacob21819.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Archive 20GB? Stan Bischof <stan@worldbadminton.com> - 2011-05-23 19:42 +0000
Re: Archive 20GB? Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-05-23 22:41 -0500
Re: Archive 20GB? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-24 11:00 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2011-05-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-05-24 08:05 +0200
Re: Archive 20GB? Stan Bischof <stan@worldbadminton.com> - 2011-05-24 18:58 +0000
Re: Archive 20GB? Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2011-05-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Tony <tony@darkstorm.invalid> - 2011-05-25 15:24 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 15:40 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-25 17:05 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 17:55 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-05-29 16:56 -0500
Re: Archive 20GB? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2011-05-26 03:19 +0000
Re: Archive 20GB? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-05-25 07:25 -0700
Re: Archive 20GB? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-05-25 11:26 -0400
Re: Archive 20GB? Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2011-05-25 16:34 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2011-05-25 11:56 -0400
Re: Archive 20GB? TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 20:19 +0200
Re: Archive 20GB? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2011-05-25 10:23 -0700
Re: Archive 20GB? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-25 16:58 +0100
Re: Archive 20GB? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-25 16:13 +0000
csiph-web