Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #68874

Re: KiCad and Wayland

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: KiCad and Wayland
Date Wed, 18 Jun 2025 05:30:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization the-candyden-of-code
Lines 30
Message-ID <slrn1054jd1.3ce8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References <mbb9diFevslU1@mid.individual.net> <102qhlf$205pe$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="6c4f9373326aed7e8d4055fc0f36ba68"; logging-data="3102467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sV5tJrNo2DB/lyKmfQGFonhcl02kwEbhCb8vdzyr5sg=="
User-Agent slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:INaI9F//aD2+r0BfeDt8x9qR5mQ=
X-Face b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:68874

Show key headers only | View raw


John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> wrote at 01:50 this Tuesday (GMT):
> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> https://www.kicad.org/blog/2025/06/KiCad-and-Wayland-Support/
>> 
><snip>
>> 
>> KiCad uses wxWidgets, where the 'x' means X11 and is cross-platform. It 
>> would be ironical if Windows becomes a better OS than Fedora or Ubuntu for 
>> electronics design.
>
> Interesting, IIRC BOINC Manager on Linux also uses wxWidgets,
> so I guess people needing that could be out if luck.

And there goes any chance I'm migrating to Wayland.

>> For a while QGIS had a banner alerting users that dialogs might not 
>> function correctly on Wayland but they seem to have overcome the problem. 
>> Because of its nature KiCad may face greater difficulty.
>> 
>> fwiw, I haven't tried but I doubt our legacy software would do well with 
>> Wayland. Like KiCad it uses window control and IPC features that Wayland 
>> specifically removed.
>
> Yes, looks that way to me too :(


Which sucks, since SOME COMPANIES are really pushing Wayland. I'm going
to hold out on X11 for as long as I can.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

KiCad and Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-16 19:25 +0000
  Re: KiCad and Wayland John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> - 2025-06-17 01:50 +0000
    Re: KiCad and Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-17 04:46 +0000
      Re: KiCad and Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 08:46 -0700
        Re: KiCad and Wayland Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-05 09:18 +0000
    Re: KiCad and Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-06-18 05:30 +0000
  Re: KiCad and Wayland Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-17 04:02 +0000

csiph-web