Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #1794
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? |
| Followup-To | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Date | Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:59:54 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <qj15f8-slp.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <39f71fac-d3bf-4144-a7ee-5d71ebd9c08f@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <e320ceeb-e75f-420f-bcc3-50dc8aa77f44@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <874o2oxzle.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6oIlEBqCjOm0MjsSUEk5CA"; logging-data="28305"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/11OO1DMM0G3nTk1G1pvhbnnzrtW1OfXs=" |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.10 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:+gbM8z2t8nRy5j6ANqZygHWZj7s= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.misc:1794 |
Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.misc
Show key headers only | View raw
John Hasler wrote: > JeffM writes: >> If you need enterprise support, why would you go elsewhere? > > Canonical provides enterprise support. Give me debian/ubuntu over redhat anyday - but one thing worth noting is that RHEL does have much longer lifetimes (of support) over even debian so if you want a server to go in and work until the hardware is dead, RHEL makes that realistic without a major OS upgrade cycle - which can be attractive to some people. -- Tim Watts
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Best practice Linux support vendors? snorble <snorble@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-13 19:12 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-14 08:36 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? snorble <snorble@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-07-15 18:35 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-15 20:09 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-16 07:49 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? General Schvantzkoph <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-16 13:40 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-16 18:19 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> - 2011-07-17 03:44 +0200
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? aw@anhrefn.saar.de - 2011-07-14 15:25 +0200
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-07-14 14:13 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-07-14 19:01 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? ray <ray@zianet.com> - 2011-07-14 14:51 +0000
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-07-14 14:34 -0700
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2011-07-14 17:32 -0500
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-15 06:59 +0100
Re: Best practice Linux support vendors? Tim Watts <tw@dionic.net> - 2011-07-15 06:57 +0100
csiph-web