Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #66855
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae |
| Date | 2025-04-03 18:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m5840qFe093U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <m55speF36j5U2@mid.individual.net> <m56thjF86hbU3@mid.individual.net> <wLmdnYQoKJMzxnP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 05:58:04 -0400, c186282 wrote: > 41 is "good". Hopefully 42 will be equally good - but, these days, > it's maybe better to wait for a .1 release - > they tend to launch a tad TOO soon of late. BookWorm was the same way > - indeed seemed DEDICATED to making sure the stuff I used most > wouldn't work Also way too 'Buntu ... who the hell did they hire > ??? Deb is supposed to be 'core', 'the foundation', boring but super > solid/consistent. I think it was 39 to 40 that was a little rocky for a few weeks in the KDE spin. There was a lot going on with Qt, KDE, and Wayland that took sorting out. So far 42 has been a non-event. I ran through all the stuff I use with no problems. The only problem I've had recently was with the Raspberry Pi OS. The kernel was optimized for RPi 5 and whatever was updated in VS Code did not play well so I had to move back to the RPi 4 kernel. Ubuntu had some updates Monday and they didn't break anything either.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Fedora 42 pre-releae rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-02 22:41 +0000
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-03 09:00 +0100
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-04-03 05:58 -0400
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-03 18:57 +0000
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-04-03 16:02 -0400
Re: Fedora 42 pre-releae rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-04-04 01:23 +0000
csiph-web