Re: The Death of COBOL

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: The Death of COBOL
Date	4 Oct 2024 23:49:07 GMT
Lines	20
Message-ID	<lmbd7jF70h3U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<lmb0nnF4ppiU7@mid.individual.net> <vdpl9c$bgk6$20@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net 9LZYATmW2+tI5SMIR1dOwgDOpYF4viTkZn1Dgzqw6K9GaVhkl5
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ofBMTJIVojvae/L/52jr8zxgmtI= sha256:SHVASY6XNXY6KNtlH66KxAX9lYuhO7019tUsA5wxKaQ=
User-Agent	Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:59115

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:04:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On 4 Oct 2024 20:15:52 GMT, rbowman wrote:
> 
>> https://wumpus-cave.net/post/2024/10/2024-10-01-death-of-cobol/
index.html
>> 
>> It's a photocopy of a 1992 article proclaiming the demise.
> 
> You know how they call Latin a “dead” language?
> 
> COBOL is the same.

Latin wasn't dead enough that I didn't have to take two years of it in 
high school. That was then but I doubt it's the case now.

Note: it was not a Catholic high school. Catholic High certainly required 
Latin so the nerds could argue over pronunciation during football games. 
Church Latin is more silibant.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Death of COBOL rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-04 20:15 +0000
  Re: The Death of COBOL Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-04 21:04 +0000
    Re: The Death of COBOL rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-04 23:49 +0000
      Re: The Death of COBOL Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-05 06:40 +0000
        Re: The Death of COBOL rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-10-05 07:05 +0000

csiph-web