Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #35785

Re: COBOL and tricks

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: COBOL and tricks
Date 28 Oct 2022 08:03:15 GMT
Lines 29
Message-ID <js1gm3F4709U4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <ouSdnQ4MiuXqxFf_nZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> <87zghai2dh.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <16ydncnktcv0sE__nZ2dnUU7-Q3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> <tauc3e$3cjkn$1@dont-email.me> <BbKdnS4bVeX7G07_nZ2dnUU7-RXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <L0XAK.382240$ssF.266663@fx14.iad> <tb1iih$3pthf$2@dont-email.me> <cL_AK.547297$X_i.178414@fx18.iad> <JJadnSUvZb3dlUv_nZ2dnUU7-fXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1034215367.679945065.348792.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <tb6u29$15u9k$2@dont-email.me> <2074045549.679949818.212355.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <tb71r6$14eug$1@dont-email.me> <2aadnYfne4Fc9Er_nZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <tb7qih$14eug$2@dont-email.me> <gKydnS1iKPAP1EH_nZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> <1993356671.680307216.022066.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <HpKdnfYAbfikikP_nZ2dnUU7-cvNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <574555364.680474584.174865.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <Q8FDK.545253$J0r9.492663@fx11.iad> <tjfvr0$30r9q$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net 3bECospeHHXW3U7dPJi5Qwmcqe2piYDJ4n41/wo1gU3fWT7srI
Cancel-Lock sha1:SoqWK2Ck5ly+CyyIBAacPiXYeFY=
User-Agent Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Xref csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:222188 comp.os.linux.misc:35785

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 02:20:00 -0500, Charles Richmond wrote:

> On 7/25/2022 5:52 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> 
>> A sufficiently determined programmer can write unreadable code in any
>> language.  Convoluted code with no comments is even worse.
>> Convoluted code with outdated, incorrect comments is worse still.
>> 
>> 
> At a PPoE, we received FORTRAN code under a tech-sharing agreement with
> a competitor. A comment atop a convoluted subroutine read:
> 
> C
> C        IT TOOK ME A LONG TIME TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS c        ROUTINE
> WORKS, AND IT WILL TAKE YOU A LONG TIME C        ALSO, CAUSE I AM NOT
> GOING TO TELL YOU HOW IT C        WORKS.
> C
> 
> a very helpful comment indeed!

In this context, it is obligatory to link this:

 https://gist.github.com/FedericoPonzi/f026ff5c210e738ee03d271c8fc0f29b

-- 
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
 http://www.mirrorservice.org

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: COBOL and tricks Charles Richmond <codescott@aquaporin4.com> - 2022-10-28 02:20 -0500
  Re: COBOL and tricks Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2022-10-28 08:03 +0000
    Re: COBOL and tricks Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-10-28 22:17 +0000
      Re: COBOL and tricks Charles Richmond <codescott@aquaporin4.com> - 2022-10-29 07:45 -0500
        Re: COBOL and tricks Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2022-10-29 17:07 +0000

csiph-web