Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation?

From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation?
Date	2024-05-10 12:24 +0200
Message-ID	<j891hkxjus.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<v1fjob$3st0e$5@dont-email.me> <slrnv3pa0c.5tj.rotflol2@zerosignal.strangled.net> <v1idru$kv8v$1@dont-email.me> <17cdef3ac1cb34e4$301376$1425202$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <v1khbm$24lc0$1@news1.tnib.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2024-05-10 09:11, Marc Haber wrote:
> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>> If you are the only user then why do you even bother with a login
>> and password?
>>
>> That's about as ridiculous as entering a password to your
>> refrigerator just to grab a ham sandwich.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> I would discuss that seriously with a serious discussion partner.
> You're disqualified.
> 

I suspect he is another person with changed name, that had similar 
ridiculous ideas about year ago.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-08 11:22 +0100
  Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-09 10:40 +0000
    Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-09 12:59 +0100
      Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-05-09 21:27 +0000
        Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-10 09:11 +0200
          Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-05-10 12:24 +0200
        Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-10 17:14 +0100
      Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-11 14:55 +1000
        Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-11 08:58 +0100
          Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-11 08:54 +0000
      Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-11 15:06 +1000
        Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-11 08:59 +0100
        Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-11 12:21 +0200
          Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-05-14 03:42 +0000
            Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-14 08:29 +0200
              Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-05-14 20:00 +0000
                Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-15 09:11 +0200
                Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-05-15 11:19 +0100
                Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-15 13:57 +0200
                Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-05-15 13:58 +0200
            Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-05-14 14:53 +0200
              Re: Not a request for help, but an explanation? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2024-05-14 17:24 +0200

csiph-web