Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #721
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 |
| Date | 2011-04-14 15:36 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <io70p2$o7s$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8bb3e138-de1f-4283-a215-805b75a2aecb@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <5crcq61ktl6e1ju7s9facuqsj8qlp4lu2g@4ax.com> <io6ran$moi$1@reader1.panix.com> |
JohnF wrote: > Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> wrote: >> davidecool <davidecool@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> this post is my last chance to recover data from a raid. >> Usual answer is to restore from backup, >> Not helpful when the RAID is your backup though, > > Yeah, most people seem to confuse raid with a backup > solution when it's really an availability solution. > Anything that's powered up and spinning isn't a backup. > I have three one-disk nas's (synology ds109j's) on > my soho lan, each one backing up all four of my pc's > (and a few old digital vaxstations and an alphaserver). > Costs less than one two-disk nas raid. > Usually only one nas is powered up at a time, in rotation, > except for occasional syncs when something looks weird. > If one disk and/or chasis dies, at very most a day's work > dies with it. > Raid just scares me as backup. Especially if the > controller dies, then depending on raid level, it can > be hard to make sense of the disks without an identical > duplicate controller. My disks are all just ext3, easily > mountable on any linux box. In fact, I have a Thermaltake > BlacX duet just for that purpose in case of trouble. > Raid, I think, is just the wrong way to go for most > typical soho-type backup requirements. You might want > a raid on your lan for availability purposes, so everybody > keeps working in case a single spindle dies. But you want > a whole different (most likely non-raid) backup solution, > whether or not you have an online raid for availablity. +100 backup means simplest possible restore solution. Raid ain't that. My backup is just a second disk. Backs up other disks. If they go, new disk and restore, if IT goes, new disk and re-backup. Its all in a cheap as chips low power headless server, running rsync..
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 davidecool <davidecool@gmail.com> - 2011-04-12 02:55 -0700
Re: Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2011-04-14 13:49 +1000
Re: Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-04-14 13:03 +0000
Re: Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-14 15:36 +0100
Re: Data Recovery from Nas Acer NS04 "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2011-04-14 22:54 +0200
csiph-web