Re: Electicity Supply

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Electicity Supply
Date	Sat, 6 Sep 2025 15:01:01 +0200
Lines	44
Message-ID	<dtntolxk22.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<106mke5$1di32$1@dont-email.me> <nbcrnlxnfi.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <MAJqQ.290900$jMMa.101474@fx09.iad> <108hddu$3bl64$2@dont-email.me> <pdm0olxoak.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <mh6h0nFu9tvU2@mid.individual.net> <108leod$b9i7$1@dont-email.me> <mh7ctfF3ukcU1@mid.individual.net> <i5csQ.392030$jMMa.159344@fx09.iad> <fFqdncGDwe7R-yz1nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <05f9olxd4v.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <108u7js$2f7ql$3@dont-email.me> <T9GcnVBPhalWJi_1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mhh2vdFmqn9U6@mid.individual.net> <slrn10b6rc2.1t62b.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <7_GcnXdgUOPflyj1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <1093b48$24hge$1@paganini.bofh.team> <yYydnaSVfqcrzij1nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <1094g9v$26hbg$1@paganini.bofh.team> <1096fcv$djbq$1@dont-email.me> <vqsiolx4om.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <109h2mk$2v7cs$2@dont-email.me> <109h3tf$2vpls$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net 2D8epcea+qXsc2squndJPQ52vwmNKWihx3NONnCsfq/4jS0WRa
X-Orig-Path	Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:GL9wa3v+174Zz96Wk/K4f7LlqXI= sha256:3L8AMOTbIrogWCuLoWHWPtT/RejvFeuCVb33y7k+u7M=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To	<109h3tf$2vpls$3@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:73547

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2025-09-06 12:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 06/09/2025 11:33, Nuno Silva wrote:
>> On 2025-09-02, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-09-02 12:03, Nuno Silva wrote:
>>>> On 2025-09-01, Ian wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>      Oh, 13a at 240v ... over 2700 watts. Wow !
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Guess your clock-radio won't overload THOSE !  :-)
>>>>
>>>> I think one notorious difference that I've seen mentioned a couple 
>>>> times
>>>> on the web is that water kettles will boil water more quickly. And that
>>>> in the US stovetop kettles were more often seen because such electric
>>>> kettles wouldn't be as fast as in ~240V. Now I've got no idea of how
>>>> precise such assessments are.
>>>
>>> It is true. UK kettles are more powerful. Doubling the voltage with
>>> the same current means double power.
>>
>> (Yeah; the precision I was alluding at was of stovetop kettles being
>> more common in 110/120V land, not of the higher efficiency of 240V
>> ones. The latter, indeed, is implicit because of the much higher
>> voltage.)
>>
> 
> Well yes. A 3kW kettle with just enough water to make one cup of coffee 
> will be boiling in the time it takes to grind the beans.
> 
> Stove kettles take MUCH longer.

My stove kettle on my induction ring with just about 1KW boils faster 
that getting the fresh tea leaves on the strainer.

https://share.google/images/A4uRsiiXLGxiQvVVl

...

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Electicity Supply Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-06 11:33 +0100
  Re: Electicity Supply The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-06 11:54 +0100
    Re: Electicity Supply Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-06 14:16 +0200
      Re: Electicity Supply The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-06 13:22 +0100
    Re: Electicity Supply "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-06 15:01 +0200

csiph-web