Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #69857
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| References | (6 earlier) <me7p0gFrqveU3@mid.individual.net> <atNfQ.1034906$sKi9.737448@fx14.iad> <meac6kFrqveU6@mid.individual.net> <J5TfQ.2$TQj.0@fx41.iad> <meahluFrqveU8@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <b8agQ.30679$Tc12.24824@fx17.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com |
| Date | 2025-07-23 18:48 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> writes: >On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:08:57 +0000, Scott Lurndal wrote: > >> Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> writes: >>>On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:44:22 +0000, Scott Lurndal wrote: >>> >>>> Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> writes: >>>>>On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:32:37 -0700, John Ames wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 07:14:12 -0000 (UTC) >>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> > For sure it's a really limited Unix port since the target HW is >>>>>>> > the original PC or PC/XT. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which is still way more powerful than an early-1970s-vintage >>>>>>> PDP-11, >>>>>>> which is what Bell Labs Unix was originally developed on, and for. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmm, that's an interesting question, actually - the Bell Labs -11 >>>>>> was an 11/45, which was much faster than the original -11s, >>>>> >>>>>Our was acceptable on an 11/40. That was vanilla Sixth Edition. >>>> >>>> We ran the sixth edition on an 11/34. Also had the unix v32 version >>>> on the 11/780 by 1980. >>> >>>I think our 780 got V32 in summer 1979. But it wasn't long before we >>>moved to 4.0BSD. >> >> In our case, we had to take one of the 11/780s (we had four, plus the >> MA780 shared memory box with 4MB DRAM) out of production in the >> late-night/early-morning hours to play with V32. V32 was a bit of a >> dog since V32 didn't have paging support. > >It was indeed. We'd had UNIX since July 1975 (50 years ago this month!) > >The 780 was delivered to run UNIX, and only had VMS installed to check the >hardware. It was later supplemented by a 750. We weren't a unix shop, at the time. The vaxen were running VMS (originally 1.6? (RSX utilities) in testing, 2.0 and later 3.0 in production). The MA780 had installed (INSTALL) compilers and a few other frequently used applications so they could be shared amongst all the 11/780s. When I later started at Burroughs, we ordered a 11/750 to run Simula. More of an experiment, most of the processor modeling was done on a B7900 in ALGOL. > >We had countless UNIX systems over the years, from different manufacturers >(Sun, for quite a while). I run eight FreeBSD systems here at home. Transferred to the Convergent Technologies sub in '89, were we had a number of unix systems (some from the CT side, some from the Unisys side) culminating in OPUS (64 node SVR4/ESMP single-system image loosely coupled MPP machine). We built a 88100-based Unix box (S/8400), which sold well in Japan. SVR4/mk used the Chorus Systemes microkernel and leveraged some of the SVR4/ESMP I/O drivers, but most of the unix actors (Process Management, Object Management (e.g. filesystems), Streams Management (SVR4 Streams) were written in C++. This morphed into the EEC sponsored project Amadeus (Unisys, USL, Fujitsu, ICL et alia) to build a distributed version of SVR4.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-07-16 01:24 -0400
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-07-16 15:53 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2025-07-16 12:41 -0400
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-07-16 17:32 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-07-16 17:54 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-07-17 03:44 -0400
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2025-07-19 09:48 +0300
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-19 07:14 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-07-19 17:49 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-07-21 09:32 -0700
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-07-21 16:04 -0700
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-21 23:06 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-22 14:46 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2025-07-21 16:07 -0400
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2025-07-21 21:16 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-21 22:27 +0100
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-21 22:42 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-07-21 16:06 -0700
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-22 10:08 +0100
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-22 22:16 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-07-22 19:19 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-22 14:44 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2025-07-22 20:55 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-22 21:08 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2025-07-22 22:29 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-07-23 18:48 +0000
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2025-07-21 16:05 -0400
Re: Hmmm ... Downloaded Xenix - But It's *41* Floppies Worth Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2025-07-19 11:41 +0100
csiph-web