Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #35494
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| From | "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> |
| Subject | Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives |
| Date | 2022-08-23 00:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Yi2dnVr7RNd5wJn-nZ2dnZfqnPrNnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
For all the pretense of 'superiority', the BSDs have a serious problem with the modern world - they do not seem to cope with the newer SAMBA standards ... SMB2/SMB3 ... which most of your common NAS systems stick to these days for good reasons. An NAS is now COMMON - lots of commercial units, Sinology seems most popular, and various free/semi-free variants. However they ALL depreciate the insecure SMB1 protocol now. FreeBSD and friends - indeed ALL BSDs apparently - are STUCK a decade behind the times and offer NO good/fast ways to access SMB2/SMB3 network shares. Yea, yea, you can use a Gnome virtual file system and similar tricks but all agree the PERFORMANCE is for CRAP (to put it gently) and the set-up for automounting said shares seems kinda insecure/bad/inflexible. Google is of NO help here - spent many HOURS looking around. Seems like the very idea of efficient/fast SMB2/3 never penetrated the BSD mind despite all the years that have passed, and security issues that have appeared. I'd like to build a very secure 'server' based on FreeBSD or perhaps the even more anal OpenBSD .. and one requirement is to back up several existing NAS systems and float a small DB to assist in searching about 40tb worth of files dating back into the mid 80s - by name/date/type and to some extent content. This is a LOT of stuff and the newer stuff changes quite a bit, quite often, as people move big folders around on the source units. Slow/insecure is NOT an option. SMB1 is OUT. GVFS is OUT. I'm left with hardening Debian, or maybe the Oracle "unbreakable" Linux - but as it's a RH deriv I wonder if it's now all alpha packages since IBM bought out RH, just like Centos. (oh, and that HORRIBLE Gnome desktop & accessory pack - GAK !!!). Any words of wisdom here ???
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-08-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-08-23 10:56 +0100
Re: Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-08-25 01:41 -0400
Re: Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-08-25 10:38 +0100
Re: Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-08-25 20:55 -0400
Re: Not Strictly Linux - How To Do SMB2/SMB3 Efficiently With FreeBSD & Derivatives "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-08-25 21:33 -0400
csiph-web