Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #57716
| Subject | Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| References | (9 earlier) <99eadbf9-9400-12f6-5e17-969612b35cc4@example.net> <JcydnT1c0t5VTDD7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <v8l6kp$3edug$4@dont-email.me> <UDidneQk_4HOUDP7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <6608c08b-f361-b472-4f0c-34f202adf2f0@example.net> |
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
| Organization | vector apex |
| Date | 2024-08-04 21:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <LrKdncS1nJDwty37nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 8/4/24 6:07 AM, D wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> I'm beginning to agree with 'D' ... that Linux has become >> too much of a 'business', that The Vision has been lost. >> Soon the Foundation will find a way to just sell it to M$ >> and that's that. > > I would imagine a first step is to limit participation based on > ideological grouns. I could imagine license requirements, more rules > etc, and attempts to bend the foundation to the will of one or two > bigger manufacturers at the expense of the rest. Every subterfuge will be employed. M$ esp has LOTS of lawyers .... > I think everyone here also remembers disasters such as the linux > foundations goals during corona, as another example of it going to > pieces. > >> The BSDs may be the last refuge - I think they're mostly >> tended by more 'academic' cultured people. >> >> And if any young gurus have envisioned some new OS with >> much of the Linux goodness/solidity/simplicity - now's the >> time to really get into writing it. > > I often wonder if a new genius will emerge for an OS reboot? Was Linus a > one time thing, or would it be possible for it to happen again? There were many operating systems floating around in the 70s-90s. Most went nowhere - but that was not necessarily because they were bad, just that writers kind of wanted to concentrate efforts on the leading few. Ever tried BeOS ? You CAN get an x86 version that is still maintained and (slowly) growing. It was writ with the GUI fully in mind - rather than an add-on feature as with Win/Lin/(Apple). Has a kinda Win-98/2k feel. Firefox and some other useful stuff has been ported. OS9 ... which you can still buy ... was meant for small CPUs (6809) and microcontrollers. It has a "UNIX-ish", flavor, but smaller/faster/smarter. Could easily be upgraded to 32/64 bits. Used it a bit on a CoCo and it wasn't bad at all. https://www.microsys.de/en/products/software/os-9/ BOS - 'Business (or "Boss") OS' was fairly popular, esp on the old Sage 68k boxes (always wanted one !). In any case, through the 70s-90s there were MANY experiments. Some were Unix-based, others were kinda off-the-wall. There are also 'retired' systems like VMS. This represents a pool of IDEAS today's wannabe gurus can tap into - what worked well, what didn't. They don't HAVE to start from scratch. > Lacking that, I think perhaps that the people who do not like the > direction of linux might rally behind one of the BSDs. The problem there > is the HW support, but that could in theory be improved with more money > and more funded developers. I don't think the BSDs get much money/helpers. That COULD change, esp if Linux decomposes like we kinda expect. But would the same chain of events happen again ? Once something becomes prominent, seems profitable, the same psychologies kick in. One of those "human things". With Linus as "king" the Linux kernel and ownership rules, we have remained fairly consistent to "The Vision" - but how many LIKE Linus are out there ???
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-07-27 01:33 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-07-27 01:46 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-04 00:14 -0700
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2024-08-04 09:39 +0100
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-07-27 07:52 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-27 14:20 +0100
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-07-27 10:05 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-07-27 20:16 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-07-27 15:17 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-07-28 11:06 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-07-28 07:25 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-07-28 19:07 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-07-28 01:54 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-07-28 11:18 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-02 00:41 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-02 13:41 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-03 02:44 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-03 12:49 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-03 11:49 +0100
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-03 08:13 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-08-03 08:08 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-03 20:37 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-04 12:07 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-04 21:27 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-05 15:02 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-04 17:10 +0000
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-08-04 19:21 +0100
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2024-08-04 19:00 +0100
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-04 15:22 -0700
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-04 22:02 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-04 21:36 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-05 15:02 +0200
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-06 01:37 -0400
Re: GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke" D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-06 10:50 +0200
csiph-web