Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?
Date	Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:01:38 +0100
Organization	i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID	<63b14518-bd22-593c-c702-415acb54a9ef@example.net> (permalink)
References	<Sp-cnSz8UupYQaf6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <2b9d26c4-b7ce-e56a-f5ea-9fb319e5c77e@example.net> <veucnSZS-fWczaD6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1479926253-1732093299=:16130"
Injection-Info	i2pn2.org; logging-data="3320558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
In-Reply-To	<veucnSZS-fWczaD6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version	SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:61113

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 19 Nov 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

> On 11/18/24 4:13 AM, D wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> 
>>> There has been a long tendency in Linux/comp groups
>>> to horribly attack, belittle, abuse, anybody who has
>>> had a 'different experience' and sees things a little
>>> off some kinda poorly-defined 'norm'.
>>> 
>>> Sorry, we all didn't come up on the same track.
>>> A thousand different paths, a thousand different
>>> styles of apps/needs/solutions. Computers let
>>> you DO that.
>>> 
>>> Hey, if I feel the need to use files instead
>>> of 'pipes' then I WANT TO USE FILES INSTEAD
>>> OF PIPES. Don't like it ? Tuff titty. Any
>>> 'contributions' will be to tell me how to
>>> maximize that approach - not to rain down piss.
>>> 
>>> (actually I think pipes are better - but there
>>> are and will be other approaches/reasons)
>>> 
>>> The recent elections kinda upset the Linux/Unix
>>> groups - a lot of politics promoted a lot of
>>> threads. Well, the elections are OVER now.
>>> Back to business.
>>> 
>>> BUT ... consider ... "back to business" does
>>> not need to mean "back to old habits". We all
>>> can do BETTER, move towards the future instead
>>> of being at each others throats over NOTHING.
>>> 
>>> Just sayin'
>>> 
>>> Most everybody here seems to have been in the
>>> groove since (or during) PUNCH CARDS. Let's
>>> not be petty. We all did it OUR WAY.
>>> 
>>> Hey, I remember the giant handful of punch
>>> cards - DON'T DROP 'EM !  :-)
>> 
>> Are you saying we should disregard the emperor? Doesn't he teach us that 
>> our hate makes us stronger?
>
>
>  Well, the 'woke' really did try to show us the
>  power of higher, gigabuck-funded, hate  :-)
>
>  But that's all over for now.
>
>  In any case, I prefer to see these comp groups
>  as being much better when they are collaborative,
>  rather than derogative. Be you old boy or newbie,
>  everybody has a different 'vision', a slightly
>  different take on 'how it should be done'. Adding
>  1000 cuts and ad-homs - all too common on usenet -
>  does not represent any kind of improvement.
>
>  Just wanted to say it.
>
>

You are a wise man, 186282!

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-18 01:20 -0500
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-18 10:13 +0100
    Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-19 21:57 -0500
      Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-20 10:01 +0100
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-11-18 09:27 +0000
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-18 09:54 +0000
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-18 10:46 +0000
    Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-18 09:45 -0500
      Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 00:23 +0000
        Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-21 02:05 -0500
          Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-21 07:22 +0000
            Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-21 10:12 -0500
              Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-21 18:38 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-21 21:55 -0500
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 03:12 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-22 06:09 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 06:37 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-22 07:02 +0000
                Named pipes vs. Unix sockets (was: Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-22 07:29 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-22 08:38 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 09:37 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-22 10:00 -0500
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 20:52 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-11-22 17:06 -0500
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 00:42 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) - 2024-12-03 05:23 +0000
                Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 06:20 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-22 19:11 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-11-23 03:25 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-23 04:28 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 04:50 +0000
                Pipes v. FIFOs (was: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ?) Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2024-11-26 14:21 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-22 10:04 +0000
              Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-21 21:56 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-22 01:44 -0500
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-22 06:49 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-22 23:44 -0500
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 05:19 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 01:27 -0500
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 07:41 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-23 14:39 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202411.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-11-23 22:32 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-24 00:11 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 22:04 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-24 00:11 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 11:12 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-23 21:25 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 19:42 -0500
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-24 02:03 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 14:25 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2024-11-24 15:48 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 16:56 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-24 19:14 +0000
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-11-24 20:32 +0100
                Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-24 19:36 +0000
  Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-20 00:22 +0000
    Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-03 01:19 -0500
      Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-03 06:49 +0000

csiph-web