Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:01:38 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <63b14518-bd22-593c-c702-415acb54a9ef@example.net> References: <2b9d26c4-b7ce-e56a-f5ea-9fb319e5c77e@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1479926253-1732093299=:16130" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3320558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M"; In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:61113 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1479926253-1732093299=:16130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 19 Nov 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 11/18/24 4:13 AM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> There has been a long tendency in Linux/comp groups >>> to horribly attack, belittle, abuse, anybody who has >>> had a 'different experience' and sees things a little >>> off some kinda poorly-defined 'norm'. >>> >>> Sorry, we all didn't come up on the same track. >>> A thousand different paths, a thousand different >>> styles of apps/needs/solutions. Computers let >>> you DO that. >>> >>> Hey, if I feel the need to use files instead >>> of 'pipes' then I WANT TO USE FILES INSTEAD >>> OF PIPES. Don't like it ? Tuff titty. Any >>> 'contributions' will be to tell me how to >>> maximize that approach - not to rain down piss. >>> >>> (actually I think pipes are better - but there >>> are and will be other approaches/reasons) >>> >>> The recent elections kinda upset the Linux/Unix >>> groups - a lot of politics promoted a lot of >>> threads. Well, the elections are OVER now. >>> Back to business. >>> >>> BUT ... consider ... "back to business" does >>> not need to mean "back to old habits". We all >>> can do BETTER, move towards the future instead >>> of being at each others throats over NOTHING. >>> >>> Just sayin' >>> >>> Most everybody here seems to have been in the >>> groove since (or during) PUNCH CARDS. Let's >>> not be petty. We all did it OUR WAY. >>> >>> Hey, I remember the giant handful of punch >>> cards - DON'T DROP 'EM !  :-) >> >> Are you saying we should disregard the emperor? Doesn't he teach us that >> our hate makes us stronger? > > > Well, the 'woke' really did try to show us the > power of higher, gigabuck-funded, hate :-) > > But that's all over for now. > > In any case, I prefer to see these comp groups > as being much better when they are collaborative, > rather than derogative. Be you old boy or newbie, > everybody has a different 'vision', a slightly > different take on 'how it should be done'. Adding > 1000 cuts and ad-homs - all too common on usenet - > does not represent any kind of improvement. > > Just wanted to say it. > > You are a wise man, 186282! --8323328-1479926253-1732093299=:16130--