Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63626
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: For The Word Lovers |
| Date | 2025-01-03 12:43 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <310838ca-a332-1a10-d538-b0e74aeb96c6@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <vl3dq1$2ov5h$11@dont-email.me> <8a3bnj18b65qn3kbp09vmemdbgv4g17ido@4ax.com> <vl4q38$3148e$2@dont-email.me> <ba435ae5-f09b-0127-d613-4331a27f9e4f@example.net> <vl8364$3q4ok$1@dont-email.me> |
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025, pH wrote: > On 2025-01-02, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, pH wrote: >> >>> On 2025-01-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>> >>>>>> https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/23/svardos_drdos_reborn/?td=rt-3a >>>>>> >>>>>> Now's your chance to run Word 6.0. >>>>> >>>>> The last Word I liked was Word 95. After that it grew ever more rococo. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, LO Writer is my stuff. I have WPS Office installed, too, just >>>> for the hell of it, but I use LO. >>>> >>> >>> I like the jstar invocation of Joe as I'm a wordstar fan...why would anyone >>> use anything else? >>> >>> I wonder if there's a way to get LO to use the WS keybindings.... >>> >>> I do use LO when needed but Jstar --> enscript --> lpr for most of my >>> letters. >>> >>> pH >>> >> >> Doesn't joe have some kind of jmacs as well? > > from the man page for Joe... > > joe [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]... > jstar [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]... > jmacs [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]... > rjoe [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]... > jpico [global-options] [ [local-options] filename ]... > > > So it does a bunch...I think there is actually a WordStar clone for linux > out there but I've never investigated it. > > I should try 'joe' by itself just to see.... > > > pH > My view is that joe is actually quite capable but lives its own life away from the mainstreet. As you say, maybe I should look into it a bit more.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
For The Word Lovers rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 01:09 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-01 07:52 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 13:46 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-02 01:28 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 20:55 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:24 +0100
Re: For The Word Lovers The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-02 12:18 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-03 07:21 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:43 +0100
Re: For The Word Lovers The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:51 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:02 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-01-04 13:06 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-02 07:40 +1000
Re: For The Word Lovers Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-03 13:30 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers Eric Pozharski <apple.universe@posteo.net> - 2025-01-04 18:18 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-04 16:21 -0500
Re: For The Word Lovers Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-04 22:07 +0000
Re: For The Word Lovers Eric Pozharski <apple.universe@posteo.net> - 2025-01-07 15:19 +0000
csiph-web