Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #81911
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: For those arguing over languages... |
| Date | Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:24:38 -0800 |
| Organization | A place where nothing fits quite right |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <20260210082438.000030ed@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10mesjc$3gnr9$1@dont-email.me> <1892e7cf30654ca1$6966$1497967$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:24:43 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="4ad7a4bebb1a4fc255b8a2f01b43186c"; logging-data="3960668"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ee/TTCDeABS9IZBSieCs0zOvRjALi9LU=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:N/SC+RnxQRwT4sf5EW4C4KTMYbU= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:81911 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:08:00 +0000 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote: > > ...more fuel on the fire... > > > > https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/09/compilers_undermine_encryption/ > > > > GCC erases code whose delays obfuscates encryption delays because it > > doesn't do anything... > > A complete non issue. Click bait. > > Just shut off optimization, either en masse or selectively via the > dozens of switches. Seriously. It's funny in an "oh *right,* hadn't thought of that" kinda way, but it should *maybe* be common knowledge that if your techniques require perfect literality from the compiler, you disable optimization?
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 09:09 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 13:11 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2026-02-10 14:08 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2026-02-10 15:16 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 16:19 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 18:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-10 11:22 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... John <john@panix.com> - 2026-02-17 16:23 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-19 19:26 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-22 09:28 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-02-10 08:24 -0800
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-10 18:16 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-10 22:34 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 18:50 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-11 19:28 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 21:27 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 09:48 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:48 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-11 16:24 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:45 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 12:42 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-11 23:24 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:48 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-11 22:49 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 09:55 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 11:49 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:54 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-13 03:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 23:44 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-12 12:38 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 15:14 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-12 17:23 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-02-12 19:52 +0100
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:11 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:20 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-13 10:10 +0000
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-13 19:57 -0500
Re: For those arguing over languages... c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-12 20:56 -0500
csiph-web