Re: KiCad and Wayland

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: KiCad and Wayland
Date	Mon, 7 Jul 2025 15:14:20 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	21
Message-ID	<20250707151420.000017e1@gmail.com> (permalink)
References	<mbb9diFevslU1@mid.individual.net> <102qhlf$205pe$1@dont-email.me> <mbca8qFjumeU3@mid.individual.net> <20250617084654.00002604@gmail.com> <6868edea$0$12928$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <20250707090307.000038ea@gmail.com> <104hfsq$3474l$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="aa002dd4bf9a991830052d51f8ae7dcb"; logging-data="3283978"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gwhJH538qSJd8e4+1cV//o7Eg9LhmmS0="
Cancel-Lock	sha1:Vge11cPVQi9bjw/Uu+9kqM+2t8E=
X-Newsreader	Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:69471

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 21:57:46 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

> > ... different windows arranging themselves in a saved configuration
> > is an *extremely* well-known design pattern for GUI applications
> 
> All the apps I use on a regular basis have their own mechanisms for 
> implementing custom layouts within each document window, where they
> need it.

Sure - and that's the approach I prefer myself, all other things being
equal. But there are plenty of examples of the other approach out there
(GIMP's multi-window mode, f'rexample,) so it's not like they should've
been *surprised* by that - and if they *weren't,* then they arbitrarily
chosen to disallow an entirely valid GUI design pattern for...reasons.

Which, okay, it's their thing and it's certainly not illegal for them
to do that - but when they openly aim to be a replacement for something
that *doesn't* dictate policy on those matters, it shouldn't be a shock
when it ruffles feathers with the users of the existing system.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: KiCad and Wayland Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-05 09:18 +0000
  Re: KiCad and Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 09:03 -0700
    Re: KiCad and Wayland Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-07 21:57 +0000
      Re: KiCad and Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 15:14 -0700

csiph-web