Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #69471
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: KiCad and Wayland |
| Date | 2025-07-07 15:14 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250707151420.000017e1@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <mbca8qFjumeU3@mid.individual.net> <20250617084654.00002604@gmail.com> <6868edea$0$12928$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <20250707090307.000038ea@gmail.com> <104hfsq$3474l$9@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 21:57:46 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > > ... different windows arranging themselves in a saved configuration > > is an *extremely* well-known design pattern for GUI applications > > All the apps I use on a regular basis have their own mechanisms for > implementing custom layouts within each document window, where they > need it. Sure - and that's the approach I prefer myself, all other things being equal. But there are plenty of examples of the other approach out there (GIMP's multi-window mode, f'rexample,) so it's not like they should've been *surprised* by that - and if they *weren't,* then they arbitrarily chosen to disallow an entirely valid GUI design pattern for...reasons. Which, okay, it's their thing and it's certainly not illegal for them to do that - but when they openly aim to be a replacement for something that *doesn't* dictate policy on those matters, it shouldn't be a shock when it ruffles feathers with the users of the existing system.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: KiCad and Wayland Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-07-05 09:18 +0000
Re: KiCad and Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 09:03 -0700
Re: KiCad and Wayland Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-07 21:57 +0000
Re: KiCad and Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 15:14 -0700
csiph-web