Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #84849
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.usage.english |
| Subject | Re: GNU |
| Date | 2026-03-31 13:03 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <10qgd63$3aete$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <BQdyR.21979$WE1.12076@fx08.iad> <10qc65n$1silm$23@dont-email.me> <n2tscnFp88oU3@mid.individual.net> <10qdl7r$2cbhu$4@dont-email.me> <n304niF55mnU10@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 30/03/2026 21:28, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:02:19 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> MGBs had less than 100bhp. >> That might be something to do with it > > My friends and I went through the sportscar phase, MGBs, Spitfires, and so > forth. I had a Sprite. We thought they were cool. In retrospect my > subcompact Toyota would kick their ass off the line and around corners. > I had a Spitfire I had tuned to do 110mph, and nailed the rear end down so hard that I could drift the damn thing. Then I saw some random hatchback pulling away from me on a motorway slip road while I trembled on the limits of adhesion. Wide wheels and tyres. > My Sprite was fun but strained to make 80 mph. It was a '62 so it missed > the bug-eye panache, had the slightly larger engine, while retaining the > already marginal brakes of the bug-eye. > I had one of those., Not very good engines - 950cc I think. The 1100 and 1275cc models were a lot better. I could get about 95 out of my slightly uprated 1275. > The side screens were detachable and the top required assembling a frame, > laying the canvas over it, and snapping it down. Like on a bike you got > used to being wet if it started to rain. > That's the bunny. Again the later models were a bit better > -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: GNU Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-03-29 18:04 +0000
Re: GNU nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-29 22:14 +0200
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-29 22:39 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-29 23:54 +0000
Re: GNU Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-03-29 19:43 -0700
Re: GNU snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-03-30 04:06 +0100
Re: GNU Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-03-29 22:42 -0700
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 07:32 +0000
Re: GNU Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-03-30 09:40 -0700
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 19:02 +0000
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 07:26 +0000
Re: GNU Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-03-29 21:24 -0700
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 07:46 +0000
Re: GNU Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-03-30 09:46 -0400
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 19:57 +0000
Re: GNU Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-03-30 19:42 -0400
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 03:41 +0000
Re: GNU "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-03-31 13:28 +0200
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 20:49 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 13:42 +0100
Re: GNU "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-01 21:27 +0200
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 21:18 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 02:38 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 11:20 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 20:28 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 11:11 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 19:20 +0000
Re: GNU Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-04-01 21:26 +0000
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 02:25 +0000
Re: GNU "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-04-02 10:12 +0100
Re: GNU Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-04-02 21:11 +1100
Re: GNU "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-02 14:49 +0200
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 12:11 +0100
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-30 12:02 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-30 20:28 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-31 13:03 +0100
Re: GNU snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2026-03-31 16:04 +0100
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-31 17:26 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 21:32 +0000
Re: GNU Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 15:06 -0700
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-01 05:29 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 14:42 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 21:29 +0000
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 13:50 +0100
Re: GNU nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-30 22:35 +0200
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 04:50 +0000
Re: GNU "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-03-31 13:54 +0200
Re: GNU The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-31 14:31 +0100
Re: GNU rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 21:42 +0000
csiph-web