Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper

From	The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper
Date	2026-02-01 11:00 +0000
Organization	A little, after lunch
Message-ID	<10lnbos$3lab4$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <slrn10n0jji.16lti.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <gficnQlYz51yz-30nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <10kr2nu$vsf5$1@paganini.bofh.team> <PPGdnUq2RadgP-z0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <10lmi44$3e48j$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/02/2026 03:43, Rich wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.misc c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>>    They ARE popular - and good. Not SURE why tantalum
>>    is SO much better than, say, aluminum however.
> 
> They provide a higher capacitance per unit volume, and a significantly
> lower equivalent series resistance (ESR) (~ 10x lower), than aluminum
> electrolytic capacitors.
> 
> The very low ESR make them more useful for high frequency filtering
> than aluminum electrolytics.

In my day they were the ONLY [electrolytic] capacitor rated for +125°C 
operation. They could also withstand a bit of reverse voltage

We used nothing else in avionics


-- 
The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all 
private property.

Karl Marx

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-20 19:08 -0500
  Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-21 03:56 +0000
    Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-20 23:15 -0500
      Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2026-01-21 09:34 -0800
        Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-21 23:09 -0500
          Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-22 10:03 +0000
            Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-22 13:05 -0500
              Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-22 18:55 +0000
                Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-22 20:43 -0500
          Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-02-01 03:43 +0000
            Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-01 00:15 -0500
            Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-01 11:00 +0000
              Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-02-01 17:54 -0500
  Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-21 21:59 +0100
    Re: New 'Metal' Made With 2.5x Heat Conductivity Over Silver/Copper c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-01-21 23:18 -0500

csiph-web