Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #71899
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Linux hits a snag as Intel employees maintaining some of its? drivers are laid off |
| Date | 2025-08-22 10:14 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1089cea$1f8lv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mg58nuFbvqnU9@mid.individual.net> <107kmkc$fjp8$1@dont-email.me> <107l0nf$j2u2$1@dont-email.me> <107l1uk$jff8$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2025-08-14, Robert Heller wrote: > At Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:52:15 +0100 The Natural Philosopher > <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 14/08/2025 13:59, John McCue wrote: >> > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: [...] >> >> I've always favored AMD and my newest boxes are Ryzen 7s. With >> >> Intel seemingly trying to commit suicide in a very messy fashion >> >> I wouldn't buy a new machine with 'Intel Inside'. >> > >> > Yes, if I ever buy new, it would be an AMD. And no Nvidia :) >> > >> Horses fopr courses. Ive had good luck with Nvidia. Mt friend at the >> bleeding edge of mathematical computation, says Intel is the only chip >> that has some advanced vector instructions or something . >> I am getting fond of ARM base Pis. >> Now I know not to expect too much beyond low price > > I've had *bad* luck with Nvidia. I have no need for their semi-closed driver > (I don't really need the accel -- I almost exclusively use only xterms), but > had issues with the open source drivers as well as issues with things like the > ethernet driver on the AMD motherboard (which had a Nvidia chipset). I've started seeing at least one website that *demands* webgl. Of course the website (webapp?) could just have proper fallbacks in place, but: how are things if one wants to enable webgl without hardware acceleration? Is that doable? Is it practical? > Since my AMD motherboard died (after over 10 years of more or less continious > operation), I got a Raspberry Pi5. To replace the x86_64's guts it would cost > 3x+ what I paided for the Raspberry Pi5, complete with power supply and 256G > SSD. Basically I "replaced" a x86_64 ATX tower system with a Raspberry Pi5. > About $100 for the complete Raspberry Pi5, vs *at least* $300 to replace the > x86_64 ATX system: cheapest Intel desktop processor: $100, cheapest ATX > moderboard $100, plus RAM for the motherboard (unknown, but guessing at least > $100) -- the case, power supply (fairly recently replaced), and disks from the > old system are still good. Yeah, I can imagine. I for one would prefer to have more computing power for compilation, but the space-saving and power-saving nature of a smaller system, besides the price tag, probably shouldn't be overlooked. (But to be fair I haven't checked what's the computing power available nowadays in such smaller devices, maybe it already allows heaver CPU usage of that kind?) -- Nuno Silva
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Linux hits a snag as Intel employees maintaining some of its? drivers are laid off Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-22 10:14 +0100
csiph-web