Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #529

Re: Umount not being done

From Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject Re: Umount not being done
Date 2011-07-22 14:11 -0400
Organization PWN - Penguins With Nukes
Message-ID <slrnj2jf9o.irt.bill@lat.localnet> (permalink)
References <87sjpzzth6.fsf@engels.HistoricalMaterialism.info> <87tyafpwvw.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <87fwlyzdz4.fsf@engels.HistoricalMaterialism.info>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2011-07-22, Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> wrote:
> Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> writes:
>
>> Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> writes:
>>
>>> I'm running Debian Squeeze and have encountered a problem in that a
>>> mount point is busy and can't be unmounted. When a USB external
>>> drive (mount point is /media/mirror) is udev is forced
>>> to create a new device file. 
>
>> Just to be clear, are you saying: you tried umount, it failed because
>> busy, you unplugged it anyway and later plugged it back in?
>
> Yes. If I unplug and plug back in even a different external drive, a new
> device file is created (such as /dev/sdf1), the drive is automatically
> mounted on it, and so I can access the drive's contents. 
>
> However, now this new mount point, /dev/sddf1, is permanenly busy and so
> it can't be unmounted, even if the drive is unplugged. Because it is now
> permanently mounted on top of /dev/sde1, /dev/sdd1, /dev/sdc1 and
> /dev/sdb1, they can't be unmounted either. That is, each time I plug in
> a drive, a new device file is created that is mounted on top of the
> prior device files and can't be unmounted because it is permanently
> busy.
>
The problem is you're using one mount point for all drives. How did this
happen?

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Umount not being done Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-07-21 08:52 -0400
  Re: Umount not being done Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-07-21 14:48 +0100
    Re: Umount not being done Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-07-22 08:39 -0400
      Re: Umount not being done Bill Marcum <bill@lat.localnet> - 2011-07-22 14:11 -0400
        Re: Umount not being done Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-07-23 04:01 -0400
  Re: Umount not being done notbob <notbob@notbob.invalid> - 2011-07-21 13:55 +0000
    Re: Umount not being done J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-07-21 15:15 +0000
      Re: Umount not being done ebenZEROONE@verizon.net (Hactar) - 2011-07-21 14:47 -0400
        Re: Umount not being done Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-07-22 15:12 +0100
    Re: Umount not being done Haines Brown <haines@HistoricalMaterialism.info> - 2011-07-22 08:56 -0400
      Re: Umount not being done J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2011-07-22 13:18 +0000
      Re: Umount not being done Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-07-22 14:42 +0100
        Re: Umount not being done ebenZEROONE@verizon.net (Hactar) - 2011-07-22 11:30 -0400
        Re: Umount not being done "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2011-07-22 17:45 -0500

csiph-web