Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #3467
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint |
| Date | 2021-03-24 10:12 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <s3evpb$g6b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <20210322145810.4efb70c6@jspc> <s3ca5c$ig8$1@news1.tnib.de> <s3cf0t$qb4$1@dont-email.me> <s3dg7m$hln$1@dont-email.me> |
On 23/03/2021 20:40, Henrik Carlqvist wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:13:48 +0100, David Brown wrote: >> There is nothing that a UEFI BIOS can do that a traditional BIOS >> cannot, > > Yes it is. An UEFI BIOS is able to understand and modify contents on file > systems on the computer. First, let me repeat - there is nothing that the UEFI BIOS can do that another BIOS cannot. There is nothing hindering a non-UEFI BIOS being able to access files. A Coreboot BIOS, for example, has as much of a Linux system as you choose to compile into it. It is not UEFI - it does not provide the UEFI-specified services, or need the UEFI partition. Secondly, a UEFI BIOS cannot access files except on a very simplistic and limited filesystem (fat32). It can't work with files on NTFS, ext4, btrfs, raid, or anything else. > This in combination with the feature to be able > to update the BIOS from software running in the computers operating > system makes things interesting in a bad way. This is the kind of > features that gives us persistent malware surviving reformatted and even > repaced disks. The features are not only used by malware makers but has > also been used by vendors like Lenovo for bloatware: > > https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150812/11395231925/lenovo-busted- > stealthily-installing-crapware-via-bios-fresh-windows-installs.shtml > > What did they call this? Secure boot? > Traditional BIOSes have been able to block writes to boot sectors (previous to that, boot sector viruses were "popular". The only virus I have ever had on a computer was a boot sector virus). And updates to BIOS were protected by "security by obscurity" - updates were so inconvenient that you didn't do it by mistake or malware. When you have unnecessarily features that are not used (and therefore people don't get familiar with them and spot flaws), and an overly complex design, then security failures are almost inevitable.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2021-03-22 14:58 -0500
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-03-22 13:20 -0700
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2021-03-22 15:46 -0500
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@gmail.com> - 2021-03-23 00:35 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Andrew <Doug@hyperspace.vogon.gov> - 2021-03-22 22:08 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2021-03-22 16:20 -0500
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-23 08:30 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-23 08:22 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> - 2021-03-24 16:24 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2021-03-24 20:43 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-03-23 09:50 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-23 11:13 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2021-03-23 11:59 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-23 15:07 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-03-23 13:19 -0400
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-24 10:04 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-03-24 05:36 -0400
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-03-23 13:46 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-23 15:08 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2021-03-23 16:30 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2021-03-23 19:40 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-03-24 10:12 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2021-03-24 20:55 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Andrew <Doug@hyperspace.vogon.gov> - 2021-03-24 11:31 +0100
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-03-24 11:20 -0400
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2021-03-24 07:49 -0500
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2021-03-24 14:01 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2021-03-24 10:02 -0500
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> - 2021-03-24 16:05 +0000
Re: Best Desktop Computer for Linux Mint Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-03-24 11:46 -0700
csiph-web