Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #366

Re: Degraded array in adaptec 2405

Show all headers | View raw

Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> wrote:
> Until your new drive arrives, you'll be as safe as somebody who isn't
> running RAID. 

The safety might be some less... Usually raids are built from identical
drives of the same brand and maybe even from the same batch. If you
consider two identical drives which has been used exactly as many hours as
each other, if one of them breaks, how long do you expect before the other
one breaks?

regards Henrik
-- 
The address in the header is only to prevent spam. My real address is:
hc123(at)poolhem.se Examples of addresses which go to spammers:
root@localhost postmaster@localhost

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Degraded array in adaptec 2405 joe <jcharth@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 10:27 -0700
  Re: Degraded array in adaptec 2405 Aragorn <aragorn@chatfactory.invalid> - 2011-05-28 05:24 +0200
  Re: Degraded array in adaptec 2405 Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-05-27 21:38 -0600
    Re: Degraded array in adaptec 2405 Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2011-05-28 09:09 +0200
      Re: Degraded array in adaptec 2405 Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-05-28 09:00 -0600

csiph-web