Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #355
| From | "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.unix.programmer, comp.os.linux.embedded |
| Subject | Re: memory protection in linux kernels |
| Date | 2012-10-19 18:08 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <k5sj0v$sap$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <k5n858$g72$1@speranza.aioe.org> <JRTfs.4$Ci6.1@fe03.iad> <k5p8t1$3fq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <R2Wfs.9$726.7@fed11.iad> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Scott Lurndal" <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote in message news:R2Wfs.9$726.7@fed11.iad... >>> Turn on CONFIG_KDB and use kdb to set a watchpoint on the location being >>> corrupted. The processor will automatically stop and drop into kdb >>> when the location is modified. >>> [skip] >>Thank you. The target is ARM-based and runs the kernel 2.6.31.8, which has >>only KGDB support, i.e. as I understand it allows to debug via rs232. What >>is the difference with KDB? > > KDB is built in; it doesn't require a client on another machine like KGDB; > but kgdb should work for your case since you've an earlier kernel. > After googling and reading I've set up kgdb over serial line, I can break into the debugger (by stopping the kernel via /proc/sysrq-trigger) and connect from host gdb, which is part of ARM toolchain. Basically I have development board running embedded linux abd the driver I'm debugging, and my PC with two connections to the board - serial and ethernet (telnet session). After I connect with host gdb to the target, I'm no longer able to do telnet to the board, because the only way to reproduce the memory corruption is to apply some configuration with user application on the board. Is it expected or I'm doing something wrong, and there's a way to have alive IP connection to the target *and* GDB session? Mark
Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
memory protection in linux kernels "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-17 17:32 -0400
Re: memory protection in linux kernels scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-10-18 13:53 +0000
Re: memory protection in linux kernels "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-18 11:57 -0400
Re: memory protection in linux kernels scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-10-18 16:24 +0000
Re: memory protection in linux kernels "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-19 18:08 -0400
Re: memory protection in linux kernels Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-10-20 12:29 +1300
Re: memory protection in linux kernels scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-10-20 19:49 +0000
Re: memory protection in linux kernels Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-10-18 17:56 +0100
csiph-web