Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.embedded > #70
| From | Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.embedded |
| Subject | Re: board-specific kernel .config files? |
| Date | 2012-01-04 21:12 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87mxa3xowg.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> (permalink) |
| References | <08WdnR8hdpe3GZ7SnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@megapath.net> |
"rafe" <rafeb AT speakeasy DOT net> writes: > I can pick up any number of kernel source trees for my Beagleboard > from all sorts of places, either git repositories or as tarballs. > (FWIW, Beagleboard is a low-cost ARM OMAP3 hardware platform, kind of > an eval board.) > > My question is: For such hardware-specific kernels, is it reasonable > or logical to expect that these .config files will already be set with > the most appropriate options? It's reasonable to expect that. However, some of the time it seems it's reasonable to expect the kernel to fail to even compile with those settings. (Certainly true of the later 2.6.XX tags.) > Is there some sort of custom or tradition here, or no? Will I still > need to "make xconfig" an puzzle through the options? A strong tradition: cross fingers as you cross compile. Phil -- Unix is simple. It just takes a genius to understand its simplicity -- Dennis Ritchie (1941-2011), Unix Co-Creator
Back to comp.os.linux.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
board-specific kernel .config files? "rafe" <rafeb AT speakeasy DOT net> - 2012-01-03 17:41 -0500 Re: board-specific kernel .config files? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-04 21:12 +0200 Re: board-specific kernel .config files? Vitus Jensen <vitus@alter-schwede.de> - 2012-02-14 22:08 +0100
csiph-web