Groups > comp.os.linux.development.system > #109

Re: per process llseek offset

From	"dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject	Re: per process llseek offset
Date	2011-05-02 15:39 -0700
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<87a6f132-b35c-47f6-8f48-bfb410035bde@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	<51ad5eed-fee6-4007-aeba-35be2d9fd80d@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <7eccb3fd-6a26-402d-8244-dd29ef175e8d@34g2000pru.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

>
> It's not clear what the "I" is that you're talking about. Are you
> talking about what a device driver can do? It can trivially keep a
> table of PIDs and offsets. Are you talking about what a process can do
> to keep its own offset? Or hwat?
>

It's about what a device driver can do to keep different offset for
all processes, EVEN between a father and his descendants.

> Personally, I would strongly urge you to keep the offsets shared.

for this "I know what I do" :-)

Back to comp.os.linux.development.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

per process llseek offset "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-05-01 22:41 -0700
  Re: per process llseek offset David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-05-02 03:50 -0700
    Re: per process llseek offset "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-05-02 15:39 -0700
      Re: per process llseek offset Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-05-02 20:25 -0600
  Re: per process llseek offset Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-05-02 13:07 +0100

csiph-web