Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #410
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.development.apps |
| Subject | Re: time conversion |
| Date | 2012-01-28 21:15 +0000 |
| Organization | Dis (not Dat) Organisation |
| Message-ID | <jg1ohu$m4e$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx> (permalink) |
| References | <jfsjn2$4hm$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2012-01-26, Bill M <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com> wrote: > What is the easiest way to convert a time value that is the number > of microseconds that have elapsed since 0000 hours 1 January 1972 into > the unixepoch (the number of seconds since 0000 hours 1 January 1970). > > Is there some time function for this already? Or do I need to use struct tm? no, and no. divide by 1000000 which converts microseconds into seconds and then add (2x365x25x60x60) which is the missing tw yars worth of seconds I am assuming both schemes agree about leap seconds. hmm, 1972 eh? You may find enlightenment in the source of ntpdate, but be aware that the NTP epoch differs by 10 seconds from the one you describe. -- ⚂⚃ 100% natural
Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
time conversion Bill M <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com> - 2012-01-26 16:22 -0600
Re: time conversion Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-01-26 23:01 +0000
Re: time conversion Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-01-27 09:18 +0000
Re: time conversion Josef Moellers <josef.moellers@ts.fujitsu.com> - 2012-01-27 14:20 +0100
Re: time conversion Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-01-27 13:50 +0000
Re: time conversion Bill M <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com> - 2012-01-27 08:19 -0600
Re: time conversion Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2012-01-28 21:15 +0000
Re: time conversion Bill M <wpmccormick@just_about_everywhere.com> - 2012-01-31 14:34 -0600
csiph-web