Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #103
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!wieslauf.sub.de!.POSTED!reversiblemaps.ath.cx!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.development.apps |
| Subject | Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? |
| Date | 30 Apr 2011 09:20:08 GMT |
| Organization | Dis (not Dat) Organisation |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <ipgk88$pfa$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx> (permalink) |
| References | <a4a34dce-b4c8-4ce0-8c7f-686b1f267e43@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <io7b70$2qn$2@speranza.aioe.org> <r63kr65g885mrl46ec4fkkfphjcrvg1laa@4ax.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | Wk8PyTvLHfx9YaNov58aSw.user.wieslauf.sub.de |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet@wieslauf.sub.de |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:30:43 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.1 |
| X-Face | ?)Aw4rXwN5u0~$nqKj`xPz>xHCwgi^q+^?Ri*+R(&uv2=E1Q0Zk(>h!~o2ID@6{uf8s;a +M[5[U[QT7xFN%^gR"=tuJw%TXXR'Fp~W;(T"1(739R%m0Yyyv*gkGoPA.$b,D.w:z+<'"=-lVT?6 {T?=R^:W5g|E2#EhjKCa+nt":4b}dU7GYB*HBxn&Td$@f%.kl^:7X8rQWd[NTc"P"u6nkisze/Q;8 "9Z{peQF,w)7UjV$c|RO/mQW/NMgWfr5*$-Z%u46"/00mx-,\R'fLPe.)^ |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:SE9i4G6AOK0obXxI8M1sSRZIy+Q= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.development.apps:103 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011-04-29, Philipp Thomas <kthomas@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:34:24 -0400, Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>Linux is perfectly capable of compiling Fortran source without Intel's help. > > Yeah, but Intels compilers produce much better performing code than > GCC. So if you're in a business where performance counts such as > number crunching you'll want the Intel compilers. I know it's popular, but is fortran really the best language for heavy duty number crunching. I guess if you're stuck with it that's another matter. -- ⚂⚃ 100% natural
Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
gfortran equivalency of ifort? Octavio <freeposte@gmail.com> - 2011-04-13 06:40 -0700
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2011-04-14 20:17 +0300
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:31 -0400
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:34 -0400
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-04-14 13:38 -0400
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Philipp Thomas <kthomas@linux01.gwdg.de> - 2011-04-29 02:59 +0200
Re: gfortran equivalency of ifort? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2011-04-30 09:20 +0000
csiph-web