Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #628

Re: memory use

From	Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject	Re: memory use
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.development.apps
Date	2011-02-10 20:06 +1300
Organization	Geek Central
Message-ID	<ij02pc$515$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> (permalink)
References	<slrnikj71n.9i7.BobT@linus.cs.queensu.ca> <iicc2g$h26$1@reader1.panix.com> <slrnikjf85.au4.BobT@linus.cs.queensu.ca>

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.development.apps

Show all headers | View raw

In message <slrnikjf85.au4.BobT@linus.cs.queensu.ca>, Bob Tennent wrote:

> But even if the above is true, it may be that one big array of structs
> will have less overhead than many parallel arrays.

Or maybe separate arrays can use separate index registers, which is a plus, 
not a minus.

Don’t guess—measure.

Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: memory use Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-10 20:06 +1300
  Re: memory use Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2011-02-10 13:41 +0000

csiph-web