Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #705
| From | John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.development.system, comp.os.linux.development.apps |
| Subject | Re: shred or scrub |
| Date | 2014-04-20 07:56 -0500 |
| Organization | Dancing Horse Hill |
| Message-ID | <87ioq45fch.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> (permalink) |
| References | <limvgj$tse$1@dont-email.me> <lio9r0$3jl$1@dont-email.me> <lisn3i$elq$1@dont-email.me> <87ppkd2cx5.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> <lj01j8$18f$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
crankypuss writes: > Given that "environmental static" occurs every time an interaction > with the network occurs, every time some devices are heard from, in > the elapsed time since the last request for a random number was > received on a multi-thread system, the whole idea of having > /dev/random block seems pretty silly. If there is so much entropy available then it will never block, will it? On the other hand, if it does block, there wasn't as much entropy available *on that particular system* as you thought. You'd be surprised how easy it is to run a low-activity machine out of entropy. In practice one uses random for paranoid activities such as generating important keys and urandom for everything else. You are, of course, free to use urandom to generate your new GPG key. -- John Hasler jhasler@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA
Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
shred or scrub "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-16 18:17 -0400
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-17 04:19 -0600
Re: shred or scrub "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-18 22:30 -0400
Re: shred or scrub Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-04-19 07:42 +0000
Re: shred or scrub Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-04-19 10:04 +0100
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-19 02:15 -0600
Re: shred or scrub Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-04-19 23:05 +0100
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-20 02:47 -0600
Re: shred or scrub John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2014-04-20 07:56 -0500
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-21 03:51 -0600
Re: shred or scrub Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-04-21 11:50 +0000
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-21 06:14 -0600
Re: shred or scrub "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 18:44 -0400
Re: shred or scrub Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-04-21 13:24 +0100
Re: shred or scrub crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-04-22 04:10 -0600
Re: shred or scrub Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-04-22 14:39 +0100
Re: shred or scrub David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-17 16:41 +0200
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-05-07 22:01 +0100
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-05-08 03:37 -0600
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-05-08 14:02 +0100
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-05-08 15:43 +0100
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design crankypuss <crankypuss@nomail.invalid> - 2014-05-09 02:56 -0600
Re: UNIX(*)/ Linux history & system design Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2014-05-09 17:57 +0100
csiph-web