Groups > comp.os.linux.development.apps > #185

Re: I like the epoll interface

From	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject	Re: I like the epoll interface
Date	2011-07-17 19:34 +0100
Message-ID	<8739i4wybk.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink)
References	<87aacf1fkc.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <353c95d9-6b59-4dd5-9ce2-26af86191fe5@v11g2000prn.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> writes:
> On Jul 15, 12:58 pm, Rainer Weikusat <rweiku...@mssgmbh.com> wrote:
>> I just felt like writing this. It's very nice to work with
>> something which was developed with reasonable performance and ease of
>> use in mind, as opposed to either 'How can we provide a facility which
>> mostly works with the least amount of new kernel code' (UNIX(*)) or
>> 'Make it FAST on a VAX !!1' (BSD).
>
> I agree, but IOCP is even better.

While I cannot claim any experience with that, the integrated thread
management would rarely do what I want to do in this respect.

Back to comp.os.linux.development.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

I like the epoll interface Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-07-15 20:58 +0100
  Re: I like the epoll interface David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-17 08:34 -0700
    Re: I like the epoll interface Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-07-17 19:34 +0100

csiph-web