Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
"Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
"Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
"Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
[Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
[Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Page 3 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 12 Next page →
| From | An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <pan.2011.04.28.16.58.55@friend.com.invalid> |
| In reply to | #19567 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:26:30 -0700, Snit chiseled C9DEE346.966E0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com in stone using Trajan: > An Old Friend stated in post pan.2011.04.28.15.44.40@friend.com.invalid > on 4/28/11 9:44 AM: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:36:13 -0700, Snit chiseled >> C9DED77D.966BE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com in stone using Trajan: >> >>> An Old Friend stated in post >>> pan.2011.04.28.15.04.09@friend.com.invalid on 4/28/11 9:04 AM: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> Makes sense. When you find the answer I would love to know. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I'll keep you posted. >>>> >>>> Well, that last post of mine was done by NewsTapLite, and was an hour >>>> ahead just like this post will be. So the problem isn't with *both* >>>> Pan and NewsTapLite, but probably with x-privat.org. I'll send them >>>> an email letting them know of the problem. >>>> >>>> But, as you can see, it had nothing to do with me using Linux, much >>>> to Flatfish's dismay. :) >>> >>> What does x-private.org use? >>> >>> :) >> >> ZING! They're using DNEWS and INN on CentOS. > > I knew it! > >> http://www.x-privat.org/system-status.php >> >> Ok, I concede that point, but I will clarify it's not because *I* was >> using Ubuntu/Pan on my netbook--which is what I believed that Flatfish >> meant. :) Anyone using x-privat (regardless of their operating system) >> would have this issue. :) >> >> I sent them an email with the issue. > > Since not all users have the problem, I am curious as to what they > respond with. The most logical reason would be that Roy (for example) posts from an area that doesn't observe Daylight Savings Time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <1151923530325695519.851688an.old-friend.com.invalid@news.x-privat.org> |
| In reply to | #19506 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > An Old Friend stated in post > pan.2011.04.28.01.39.33@friend.com.invalid on > 4/27/11 7:39 PM: > > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:36:31 -0700, Snit chiseled > > C9DE049F.965CF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com in stone using Trajan: > > > >> An Old Friend stated in post > > > pan.2011.04.26.20.21.25@friend.com.invalid > >> on 4/26/11 2:21 PM: > >> > >>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:16:48 -0400, DFS chiseled > >>> ip797m$q61$2@dont-email.me in stone using Trajan: > >>> > >>>> On 4/26/2011 4:51 PM, An Old Friend wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The system font before OS X was Chicago, and Lucida Grande > > > > > > starting > >>>>> with OS X. When they were developing Copland, Espi Sans Bold 10 > > > > > > was > >>>>> going to be the system font. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> btw, are you gonna set your system clock? > >>> > >>> The workaround I have at the moment (when I can remember to do it) > > > > is > >>> to tell my netbook I'm in Chicago. This hour-difference in posting > >>> happened after the time change. Thanks for reminding me. > >> > >> Why is there an issue at all? Are you traveling a lot or > > > something? > >> Just curious. > > > > I'm not traveling outside my time zone, so the bug is weird. Pan > > doesn't > > have a setting in its GUI to adjust the time zone manually. > > And it does not just adopt the system time? That is odd. > It happened after the time change, which is a significant clue. > > When I searched for the bug, it seemed that most people were saying > > it had to > > do with the Usenet Server and not my computer, but I'm not ready to > > just > > accept that answer, since it seems that the posts I make from my > > iPhone have > > the right time attached to them. If those posts don't have the right > > time, > > then the problem is with x-privat, and not both Pan and NewsTapLite. > > Otherwise, the problem is with Pan, and I'll post a bug report. > > Makes sense. When you find the answer I would love to know. > I'll keep you posted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <C9DED7B4.966BE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #19523 |
An Old Friend stated in post 1151923530325695519.851688an.old-friend.com.invalid@news.x-privat.org on 4/28/11 9:01 AM: >>>> Why is there an issue at all? Are you traveling a lot or something? Just >>>> curious. >>>> >>> I'm not traveling outside my time zone, so the bug is weird. Pan doesn't >>> have a setting in its GUI to adjust the time zone manually. >>> >> And it does not just adopt the system time? That is odd. > > It happened after the time change, which is a significant clue. Time change? Oh yeah, what most of you folks outside of AZ have to go through twice a year. :) ... -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <m0tydjhfaf.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #18873 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 4/26/2011 4:51 PM, An Old Friend wrote: > >> The system font before OS X was Chicago, and Lucida Grande starting with >> OS X. When they were developing Copland, Espi Sans Bold 10 was going to >> be the system font. > > btw, are you gonna set your system clock? With the amount of insanely boring dross he posts I would expect his posts to be tagged 3 or 4 hours late ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <pan.2011.04.27.16.22.50@friend.com.invalid> |
| In reply to | #19122 |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:42:16 +0200, Hadron chiseled m0tydjhfaf.fsf@news.eternal-september.org in stone using Trajan: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > >> On 4/26/2011 4:51 PM, An Old Friend wrote: >> >>> The system font before OS X was Chicago, and Lucida Grande starting >>> with OS X. When they were developing Copland, Espi Sans Bold 10 was >>> going to be the system font. >> >> btw, are you gonna set your system clock? > > With the amount of insanely boring dross he posts I would expect his > posts to be tagged 3 or 4 hours late ... Why, Hadron, it would appear that you don't like the fact that I'm successful using Ubuntu and open source software, and I choose to post about it in a group that, allegedly, is supposed to be about Linux advocacy. Surely a "true Linux advocate" such as yourself wouldn't be discouraging me from talking about how I use Ubuntu and open source software in my day to day activities. Tell me, would you be less critical of my posts if I switched to pure Debian? Is your issue that I'm using a distribution that's based on the distribution you use, and you'd rather me use your chosen distribution instead?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <ip9ss5$54u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19133 |
An Old Friend wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:42:16 +0200, Hadron chiseled > m0tydjhfaf.fsf@news.eternal-september.org in stone using Trajan: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >> >>> On 4/26/2011 4:51 PM, An Old Friend wrote: >>> >>>> The system font before OS X was Chicago, and Lucida Grande starting >>>> with OS X. When they were developing Copland, Espi Sans Bold 10 was >>>> going to be the system font. >>> >>> btw, are you gonna set your system clock? >> >> With the amount of insanely boring dross he posts I would expect his >> posts to be tagged 3 or 4 hours late ... > > Why, Hadron, it would appear that you don't like the fact that I'm > successful using Ubuntu and open source software, and I choose to post > about it in a group that, allegedly, is supposed to be about Linux > advocacy. > > Surely a "true Linux advocate" such as yourself wouldn't be discouraging > me from talking about how I use Ubuntu and open source software in my day > to day activities. > > Tell me, would you be less critical of my posts if I switched to pure > Debian? Is your issue that I'm using a distribution that's based on the > distribution you use, and you'd rather me use your chosen distribution > instead? "Hadron"'s "issue" is that he is a flaming asshole. -- "Hello," he lied. -- Don Carpenter, quoting a Hollywood agent
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <mcvgr6d4jogal82sl6jpfdgbjdlbqi097g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #19133 |
An Old Friend wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> With the amount of insanely boring dross he posts I would expect his >> posts to be tagged 3 or 4 hours late ... > >Why, Hadron, it would appear that you don't like the fact that I'm >successful using Ubuntu and open source software, and I choose to post >about it in a group that, allegedly, is supposed to be about Linux >advocacy. > >Surely a "true Linux advocate" such as yourself wouldn't be discouraging >me from talking about how I use Ubuntu and open source software in my day >to day activities. > >Tell me, would you be less critical of my posts if I switched to pure >Debian? Is your issue that I'm using a distribution that's based on the >distribution you use, and you'd rather me use your chosen distribution >instead? "True Linus advocate" Hadron Quark would not *ever* be critical of your posts, *if* you were defending Micro$oft, and *if* you were denigrating Linux and attacking its advocates. -- 'Unfortunately I believed the COLA gang when they said "it all just works".' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1arakmihmucwf$.1831de09pstb4$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18543 |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:31:46 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 4/25/2011 6:17 PM, An Old Friend wrote: >> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 4/25/2011 12:07 PM, An Old Friend wrote: >>> >>>> The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the >>>> brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon. >>> >>> >>> Gawd. Eat some red meat why don'tcha... and read some Elmore Leonard. >>> >>> >>> >> >> O HAI! -_- >> >> <waves hand> >> >> Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so many to >> choose from, I can't decide ... > > Is there a heterosexual font? <snicker> ! -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110427203104.601@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #18431 |
On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of An Old Friend: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:35:06 +0000, TomB chiseled > 20110425102802.994@usenet.drumscum.be in stone using Trajan: > >> And that's why Hadron is being a nasty prick. He just can't grok >> that Ubuntu will be used by a large company, because that means >> he's wrong about it being crap and not fit for general usage. Fact >> is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general) is *not* crap, and very fit >> for general usage. > > I certainly couldn't use it in my classes if it were not fit for > general usage. Indeed. People like you, me and literally millions of other GNU/Linux users are the living proof that GNU/Linux is more than fit for doing all sorts of useful stuff. From my personal experience even more so. -- Humor is reason gone mad. ~ Groucho Marx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <27pqoas6p3.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #18283 |
TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes: > On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Sinister Midget > III: >> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed: >>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >> >> (for a loose interpetation of "brain" ^^^^^ ) >> >>>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the >>>> GPL. >>> >>> What makes you think they should do that? >> >> Idiocy? >> >>>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with >>>> GPL code then they must release it ... >>> >>> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software >>> with GPL code? >> >> What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if >> they augment it wirh GPLed code? Someone cant read. > > In any case, nowhere it says that they will incorporate GPL'ed code > into their own software. They will simply use GNU/Linux as the > platform to run it on. And that is brilliant. And that's why Hadron is Err, I was talking about their application SW. Stop playing stupid word games. > being a nasty prick. He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a > large company, because that means he's wrong about it being crap and > not fit for general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general) > is *not* crap, and very fit for general usage. Please quote me saying Linux is crap. I use Linux you lying little moron. I think *Ubuntu* is crap. Why? Because they release garbage when its not ready and their updates hose tens of thousands of users time after time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ip2cqb$fui$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18187 |
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
>> Nice twist of case.
>>
>> http://www.muktware.com/news/24/2011/1036/german-insurance-firm-convert-10000-pcs-ubuntu
>>
>> "Under the deal LVM will replace its 10,000 PCs to use Ubuntu."
>>
>> *WILL*
>>
>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the GPL.
>
> What makes you think they should do that?
>
>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>
> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software with
> GPL code?
>
>> ,----
>>| The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based
>>| claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes,
>>| Adobe???s Reader and the OpenOffice suite.
>> `----
>>
>> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard
>> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if
>> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" ....
>
> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard
> earned' code for free?
>
> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll?
Imagine that. "Hadron" getting the GPL wrong in his haste to troll.
Wottazurprize.
--
Day in day out the GPL is turned inside out. It's easy to CLAIM it's
easy but fact does not bond with your fiction.
-- "Hadron" <gtmr4i$n1g$4@news.motzarella.org>
I have a better idea. Release the code you have been boasting about
under the GPL and we can customise it as we see fit and sell it on to
others, with our code, for say 1000 per annum per seat. You wont see a
penny of that of course but hey, thats the GPL for you!
No?
Why not?
Oh yes! You're an "advocate"...
Message-ID: <ijuuag$oe0$1@news.eternal-september.org>
"How does the GPL protect YOUR freedom by insisting that people who
use your work pass it on?" - "Hadron", getting it all wrong, as he
attacks the GPL
"Many people using other Free licenses claim that the GPL is nothing
more than a badge of hate brought about by petty jealousy and a desire
to see professionals fail by Stallman and others." - "True Linux
advocate" Hadron Quark
'So why do GPL morons cry "Freedom" while dissing the other (licenses)
which are Freer?' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <C9DA237D.95F9A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #18187 |
TomB stated in post 20110424234516.463@usenet.drumscum.be on 4/24/11 2:50 PM: >> ,---- >> | The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based >> | claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes, >> | Adobe¹s Reader and the OpenOffice suite. >> `---- >> >> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard >> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if >> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" .... > > Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard > earned' code for free? > > Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll? The point, I think, is how absurd Homer's claims are. Can you say you agree with Homer's Communist ideals in terms of IP? -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <20110425120353.532@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #18252 |
On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of Snit: > TomB stated in post 20110424234516.463@usenet.drumscum.be on 4/24/11 2:50 > PM: > >>> ,---- >>> | The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based >>> | claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes, >>> | Adobe¹s Reader and the OpenOffice suite. >>> `---- >>> >>> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard >>> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if >>> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" .... >> >> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard >> earned' code for free? >> >> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll? > > The point, I think, is how absurd Homer's claims are. What the hell have 'Homer's claims' - absurd or not - to do with the topic? Nothing. Homer didn't even post in this topic. > Can you say you agree with Homer's Communist ideals in terms of IP? If I disagree with Homer, and I feel it's worth mentioning, you'll see it. What's up with the elementary school clique mentality in here anyway. Ooh, he said something silly. You should disagree with him. He cannot be your friend anymore. Bwaaa. Hard believe we're dealing with adults here... -- Meisjes, ze zijn toch zo bizaar, meneer. Ze komen zelden klaar, meneer. Meisjes. ~ Raymond vhG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <C9DAD34B.9607B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #18293 |
TomB stated in post 20110425120353.532@usenet.drumscum.be on 4/25/11 3:10 AM: > On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of Snit: >> TomB stated in post 20110424234516.463@usenet.drumscum.be on 4/24/11 2:50 >> PM: >> >>>> ,---- >>>> | The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based >>>> | claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes, >>>> | Adobe¹s Reader and the OpenOffice suite. >>>> `---- >>>> >>>> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard >>>> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if >>>> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" .... >>> >>> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard >>> earned' code for free? >>> >>> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll? >> >> The point, I think, is how absurd Homer's claims are. > > What the hell have 'Homer's claims' - absurd or not - to do with the > topic? Nothing. Homer didn't even post in this topic. The topic has been active for some time. >> Can you say you agree with Homer's Communist ideals in terms of IP? > > If I disagree with Homer, and I feel it's worth mentioning, you'll see > it. > > What's up with the elementary school clique mentality in here anyway. I have been asking that about you and your "advocacy" herd for some time. Are you now trying to say that people who disagree with Homer's rather naïve and over-the-top claims are acting as the "advocacy" herd does? If so, well, you will have a very hard time making that case. It would be like saying people who disagree with flat-Earthers have some sort of "elementary school clique mentality" > Ooh, he said something silly. You should disagree with him. He cannot > be your friend anymore. Bwaaa. What? It is not that Homer said one thing silly, he repeatedly pushes an absolutely absurd world view which is self-contradictory. > Hard believe we're dealing with adults here... True, if he was 14 or so I can see where he would not be able to get past his rather naïve views... but I think he is older than that. -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Homer <usenet@slated.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k7mg88-ge1.ln1@sky.matrix> |
| In reply to | #18293 |
Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: > On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of Snit: >> The point, I think, is how absurd Homer's claims are. > > What the hell have 'Homer's claims' - absurd or not - to do with the > topic? Nothing. Homer didn't even post in this topic. It looks like I really touched a nerve with Snit some time back, and he never got over it, so he's hijacked this thread (as usual) with Red-baiting, to promote his extremist Libertarian agenda. My only "claims" WRT this news is that a company replacing garbage like Windows with GNU/Linux is good for them and good for Free Software. My opinion WRT any other proprietary software they might also use should be well understood by now, and is wholly irrelevant to that development. >> Can you say you agree with Homer's Communist ideals in terms of IP? > > If I disagree with Homer, and I feel it's worth mentioning, you'll see > it. Snit is an idiot if he thinks software freedom is "communism". If that were the case, then the entire world would have been "communists" prior to the enactment of the Statute of Monopolies in 1624. "IP" is an unnatural and unethical imposition, and has no bearing on /real/ property whatsoever. Software freedom (and intellectual freedom in general) is about opposing the perversion of something that clearly should never have been defined as "property" in the first place, and wasn't for most of mankind's history, and has absolutely nothing to do with the communist ideal of redistributing wealth. The principle of software freedom is about the inalienable right of unrestricted access to and utilisation of public knowledge, not "property". Period. But again, this has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Nearly every company in the world that uses Free Software also uses proprietary software. That's hardly news. What's newsworthy is a Windows closed-shop switching to GNU/Linux. -- K. | "Linux hackers are on a mission http://slated.org | from God" ~ The Vatican Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky | kernel 2.6.31.5, up 69 days | http://tinyurl.com/linuxmission
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <C9DB08C9.960F1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #18474 |
Homer stated in post k7mg88-ge1.ln1@sky.matrix on 4/25/11 10:05 AM: > Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: >> On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of Snit: > >>> The point, I think, is how absurd Homer's claims are. >> >> What the hell have 'Homer's claims' - absurd or not - to do with the >> topic? Nothing. Homer didn't even post in this topic. > > It looks like I really touched a nerve with Snit some time back, and > he never got over it, so he's hijacked this thread (as usual) with > Red-baiting, to promote his extremist Libertarian agenda. My "Libertarian agenda" is this: I think people should have the rights to what they create. How horrible! > My only "claims" WRT this news is that a company replacing garbage like > Windows with GNU/Linux is good for them and good for Free Software. > > My opinion WRT any other proprietary software they might also use should > be well understood by now, and is wholly irrelevant to that development. > >>> Can you say you agree with Homer's Communist ideals in terms of IP? >> >> If I disagree with Homer, and I feel it's worth mentioning, you'll see >> it. > > Snit is an idiot if he thinks software freedom is "communism". You keep talking about how you think IP should be communal property. How is that not a communist ideal toward IP? As far as software freedom, that no more exists than does "rock freedom". Rocks and software have no rights - they are things. > If that were the case, then the entire world would have been "communists" > prior to the enactment of the Statute of Monopolies in 1624. How much software was there then? LOL! Oh, and you have repeatedly been shown how there were concerns about IP long before then. And below you repeat your drivel about how IP should communal. Your communist ideals (in terms of IP). The very ones you claimed I was an "idiot" to recognize you have. Please make up your mind. > "IP" is an unnatural and unethical imposition, and has no bearing on > /real/ property whatsoever. Software freedom (and intellectual freedom > in general) is about opposing the perversion of something that clearly > should never have been defined as "property" in the first place, and > wasn't for most of mankind's history, and has absolutely nothing to do > with the communist ideal of redistributing wealth. So you do not believe IP should be communal? > The principle of software freedom is about the inalienable right of > unrestricted access to and utilisation of public knowledge, not > "property". Period. Knowledge should be communal... but this is not a communist ideal in terms of that knowledge? Huh? As noted: your views are poorly thought out and rather naïve. You claim this "touched a nerve" of mine... no more than any other clearly poorly thought out claims made in COLA. :) > But again, this has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Nearly every > company in the world that uses Free Software also uses proprietary > software. That's hardly news. What's newsworthy is a Windows closed-shop > switching to GNU/Linux. -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rob <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ip1msr$khq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18067 |
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:30:35 -0500, Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> wrote: > http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux- > boosted-10000-seat-pc-win > http://bit.ly/eZkDpB > > <quote> > Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen > German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use > Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations. The problem is that Canonical doesn't generate any revenue when people install their OS onto 10,000 desktops.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ip1o4g$raa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18111 |
Rob wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:30:35 -0500, Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> wrote: > >> http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux- >> boosted-10000-seat-pc-win >> http://bit.ly/eZkDpB >> >> <quote> >> Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen >> German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use >> Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations. > > The problem is that Canonical doesn't generate any revenue when people > install their OS onto 10,000 desktops. How do you know, Flounder? -- Climate and Surgery R C Gilchrist, who was shot by J Sharp twelve days ago, and who received a derringer ball in the right breast, and who it was supposed at the time could not live many hours, was on the street yesterday and the day before -- walking several blocks at a time. To those who design to be riddled with bullets or cut to pieces with Bowie-knives, we cordially recommend our Sacramento climate and Sacramento surgery. -- Sacramento Daily Union, September 11, 1861
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tt4e88-d29.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #18113 |
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Rob wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:30:35 -0500, Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> wrote: >> >>> http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux- >>> boosted-10000-seat-pc-win >>> http://bit.ly/eZkDpB >>> >>> <quote> >>> Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen >>> German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use >>> Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations. >> >> The problem is that Canonical doesn't generate any revenue when people >> install their OS onto 10,000 desktops. > > How do you know, Flounder? Canonical generates revenue through product support. So the troll was wrong. (What else is new! -- E Pluribus UNIX. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <C9D9BAE4.95EDC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #18116 |
William Poaster stated in post tt4e88-d29.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org on 4/24/11 10:57 AM: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Rob wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:30:35 -0500, Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux- >>>> boosted-10000-seat-pc-win >>>> http://bit.ly/eZkDpB >>>> >>>> <quote> >>>> Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen >>>> German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use >>>> Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations. >>> >>> The problem is that Canonical doesn't generate any revenue when people >>> install their OS onto 10,000 desktops. >> >> How do you know, Flounder? > > Canonical generates revenue through product support. So the troll was > wrong. (What else is new! How much profit do they get each year? Any ideas? -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web