Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
"Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
"Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
"Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
[Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
[Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
| From | Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnirkm55.821.ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
| In reply to | #19590 |
On 2011-04-28, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> wrote: > TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2011-04-27, the following emerged from the brain of Homer: >>> Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: >>>> On 2011-04-26, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Rofl, and this comes from a guy who thinks that software >>>>>>> augmented with GPL'ed code *must* be released. Brilliant! >>>>> >>>>> As usual TomB is showing his cluelessness AGAIN. >>>>> >>>>> This is going to be fun... >>>>> >>>>> The seed was planted. It's almost harvest time once again.... >>>> >>>> Then harvest. Bring it on. Have your fun. >>> >>> Is that Larry's way of saving face whilst back-peddling? >> >> So it seems. I'm still waiting for him to harvest his planted seed >> though. > > His seed will not gain purchase. The troll shoots blanks. -- Regards, Gregory. Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ipe418$jdq$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19743 |
Gregory Shearman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2011-04-28, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> wrote: >> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On 2011-04-27, the following emerged from the brain of Homer: >>>> Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: >>>>> On 2011-04-26, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >>>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rofl, and this comes from a guy who thinks that software >>>>>>>> augmented with GPL'ed code *must* be released. Brilliant! >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual TomB is showing his cluelessness AGAIN. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is going to be fun... >>>>>> >>>>>> The seed was planted. It's almost harvest time once again.... >>>>> >>>>> Then harvest. Bring it on. Have your fun. >>>> >>>> Is that Larry's way of saving face whilst back-peddling? >>> >>> So it seems. I'm still waiting for him to harvest his planted seed >>> though. >> >> His seed will not gain purchase. > > The troll shoots blanks. He and his trolling pals DFS, Flounder et al. are little swimmers [1], though. -- [1] I wonder if Huggies considered this in their product of the same name.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <C9DBB85C.9619E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #18591 |
Homer stated in post vgph88-meh.ln1@sky.matrix on 4/25/11 8:07 PM:
> Verily I say unto thee, that TomB spake thusly:
>> On 2011-04-25, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>
>>> Homer has proven
>
> That's proved not proven. Proven is the passive voice ("is proven", "has
> been proven" "may be proven"). "Proved" is the active voice ("I proved",
> "I have proved", "Homer has proved").
>
>> he hasn't a clue about the GPL and FOSS (...)
>
> Why, because I know the difference between open and Free?
You do repeatedly speak poorly of IP in general and then well of the GPL in
specific without reconciling why you think with the GPL it is fine to define
IP rights.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18553 |
TomB wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> Homer has proven he hasn't a clue about the GPL and FOSS (...) > >Rofl, and this comes from a guy who thinks that software augmented >with GPL'ed code *must* be released. Brilliant! It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like him are the ones with all the credibility. -- "I was told in answer number 1 that if I use GPL SW I must release my source too." - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18631 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com... > TomB wrote: > > It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like > him are the ones with all the credibility. > and I am sure that a lieing piece of shit like you has proof that he is Larry Qualig. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) |
| Message-ID | <ip6igm$601$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18634 |
"robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message news:ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com... >> TomB wrote: >> > >> It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like >> him are the ones with all the credibility. >> > > and I am sure that a lieing piece of shit like you has proof that he is > Larry Qualig. > chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and honest advocates. So I'll make this real simple for you: "... Larry Qualig's upside-down world, ... clueless liars like him... " Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. If you can't then you are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are. > "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit. > > I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500 |
| Subject | Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again |
| Message-ID | <88kdr6httcvip9hftq7vctsllbisjn67cv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18647 |
Ezekiel wrote: >chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and >honest advocates. Yep. >Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. Evidence has been presented. >If you can't then you >are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are. Another bald-face "Ezekiel" lie. Documented. Poor "Ezekiel", your hypocrisy knows no bounds, does it? You, who spew all sorts of filthy, dishonest attacks and then defend them as "opinions", now demands "proof" of mine. And why not use the proper term, which would be "evidence", you *stupid* POS? Is it because you're a patently dishonest POS, or because you're a fscking idiot who doesn't understand the difference? >I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon. Evidence has been presented, and I honestly believe that he is Larry Qualig. That's no lie, and anyone who claims that that it is is a liar. OTOH... "Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe things like "each and every advocate happens to support the one and only party-line that Schestowitz defined for them." "Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe that we are "hypocrites" because we think that certain things that are A-OK when done in a normal, competitive situation, but objectional when done by a company that already has extraordinary power in the market. -- "Evidence and proof are essentially the same thing you idiot." - trolling fsckwit Ezekiel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals |
| Message-ID | <m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18648 |
chrisv wrote: >Ezekiel wrote: > >>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and >>honest advocates. > >Yep. > >>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. > >Evidence has been presented. > >>If you can't then you >>are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are. > >Another bald-face "Ezekiel" lie. Documented. > >Poor "Ezekiel", your hypocrisy knows no bounds, does it? > >You, who spew all sorts of filthy, dishonest attacks and then defend >them as "opinions", now demands "proof" of mine. > >And why not use the proper term, which would be "evidence", you >*stupid* POS? > >Is it because you're a patently dishonest POS, or because you're a >fscking idiot who doesn't understand the difference? > >>I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon. > >Evidence has been presented, and I honestly believe that he is Larry >Qualig. > >That's no lie, and anyone who claims that that it is is a liar. > >OTOH... > >"Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe things like "each and every >advocate happens to support the one and only party-line that >Schestowitz defined for them." > >"Ezekiel" *cannot* honestly believe that we are "hypocrites" because >we think that certain things that are A-OK when done in a normal, >competitive situation, but objectional when done by a company that >already has extraordinary power in the market. Why has "Ezekiel" not responded to any of the above? It appears that "Ezekiel" has me filtered, and therefore can safely ignore anything that I write but has not been quoted by someone else. Makes it a bit difficult to have a "fair" argument, I would say!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip6stq$388$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18700 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com...
> chrisv wrote:
>
>>Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and
>>>honest advocates.
>>
>>Yep.
>>
>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>
>>Evidence has been presented.
>>
Another LIE. Well done turd - you're now covering up your current lies with
more lies. Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>>
>>You, who spew all sorts of filthy, dishonest attacks and then defend
>>them as "opinions", now demands "proof" of mine.
>>
Learn to read because I'm not demanding anything turd. *You* are the one
who is constantly accusing others of lying ("You, who spew dishonest
attacks..." , "liars like Larry Qualig", etc) - yet you're the piece of shit
liar.
You claimed Hadron is Larry - prove it liar.
You claimed "evidence" has been presented - prove it liar.
The "prove it" is rhetorical. I don't demand or expect any proof because I
know that a piece of shit liar like you can not and will not provide
anything to backup you lies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip6tbn$7j8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18702 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message news:ip6stq$388$1@dont-email.me... > >>> >>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. >>> >>>Evidence has been presented. >>> > > Another LIE. Well done turd - you're now covering up your current lies > with more lies. Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented? > > > > > You claimed Hadron is Larry - prove it liar. > You claimed "evidence" has been presented - prove it liar. > Or to put this another way that even a tart like you might be able to understand. I've written *opinions* that you claim are lies because you're too stupid to tell the difference between a statement of fact and an opinion. Your posts are NOT opinions- you have *clearly* posted statements of fact: - 'Evidence has been presented.' - 'Hadron is Larry Qualig.' These aren't opinions turd - you're claiming FACTS and these are FACTS that you know are wrong. This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it turd?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <isvdr6h2s821v9caa2cqo1q31nt7a0u07m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18704 |
Ezekiel wrote: >I've written *opinions* that you claim are lies because you're too stupid to >tell the difference between a statement of fact and an opinion. Nope. You are a liar. >Your posts are NOT opinions- you have *clearly* posted statements of fact: See below, you piece of shit liar. >- 'Evidence has been presented.' It has. >- 'Hadron is Larry Qualig.' You are lying again, "Ezekiel". I have not stated that I know for certain that they are the same. I said I *think* they are the same. You can't beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel". >These aren't opinions turd You are mispresenting things, you shameless liar. >- you're claiming FACTS and these are FACTS that >you know are wrong. Nope. You are a bald-face liar, "Ezekiel". It is a *fact* that evidence has been presented in the past. It is a *fact* that I think that "Hadron" is Larry. >This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it turd? Nope. This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it, fsckwit? When will you learn that you cannot beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip6vml$5bs$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18726 |
useless piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:isvdr6h2s821v9caa2cqo1q31nt7a0u07m@4ax.com... > Ezekiel wrote: > >>I've written *opinions* that you claim are lies because you're too stupid >>to >>tell the difference between a statement of fact and an opinion. > > Nope. You are a liar. > >>Your posts are NOT opinions- you have *clearly* posted statements of fact: > > See below, you piece of shit liar. > >>- 'Evidence has been presented.' > > It has. > >>- 'Hadron is Larry Qualig.' > > You are lying again, "Ezekiel". I have not stated that I know for > certain that they are the same. I said I *think* they are the same. > > You can't beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel". > >>These aren't opinions turd > > You are mispresenting things, you shameless liar. > >>- you're claiming FACTS and these are FACTS that >>you know are wrong. > > Nope. You are a bald-face liar, "Ezekiel". > > It is a *fact* that evidence has been presented in the past. > > It is a *fact* that I think that "Hadron" is Larry. > >>This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it turd? > > Nope. This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it, fsckwit? > > When will you learn that you cannot beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel"? > BAWAWWAAAAAA!!!!! watch the chrisv turd squirm like a worm!!!!! BAWWAWAAAAAA!!!!!! "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a worthless piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip6vrl$79b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18733 |
"robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message news:ip6vml$5bs$3@speranza.aioe.org... > > useless piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:isvdr6h2s821v9caa2cqo1q31nt7a0u07m@4ax.com... >> Ezekiel wrote: >> >>>I've written *opinions* that you claim are lies because you're too stupid >>>to >>>tell the difference between a statement of fact and an opinion. >> >> Nope. You are a liar. >> >>>Your posts are NOT opinions- you have *clearly* posted statements of >>>fact: >> >> See below, you piece of shit liar. >> >>>- 'Evidence has been presented.' >> >> It has. >> >>>- 'Hadron is Larry Qualig.' >> >> You are lying again, "Ezekiel". I have not stated that I know for >> certain that they are the same. I said I *think* they are the same. >> >> You can't beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel". >> >>>These aren't opinions turd >> >> You are mispresenting things, you shameless liar. >> >>>- you're claiming FACTS and these are FACTS that >>>you know are wrong. >> >> Nope. You are a bald-face liar, "Ezekiel". >> >> It is a *fact* that evidence has been presented in the past. >> >> It is a *fact* that I think that "Hadron" is Larry. >> >>>This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it turd? >> >> Nope. This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it, fsckwit? >> >> When will you learn that you cannot beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel"? >> > > > > BAWAWWAAAAAA!!!!! > > watch the chrisv turd squirm like a worm!!!!! > > BAWWAWAAAAAA!!!!!! > > "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a worthless piece of shit. > > He's such a fscking idiot. Your description of him hits the nail squarely on the head. There really isn't a more stupid "advocate" than someone like him. Reminds me of this recent post: <quote> >> Yes they have, by allowing complete losers like chrisv and Dumb Willie >> and 7 and Rex Ballard to post unrebuked and unchallenged. > There are certainly a few other names that deserve to be on that list. But those are definite the "core idiots" of COLA. "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!" (George Carlin) - Now imagine there are 20 advocates in COLA. Somebody has to be in that bottom 20%. </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <v82er65a4e7lu0ra2r3nhtbrt1r7b5qomc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18736 |
Ezekiel wrote: >Your description of him hits the nail squarely on the head. Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". He describes me as a "liar", which is a lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip71l5$arm$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18741 |
documented piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:v82er65a4e7lu0ra2r3nhtbrt1r7b5qomc@4ax.com... > Ezekiel wrote: > >>Your description of him hits the nail squarely on the head. > > Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". > > He describes me as a "liar", which is a lie. > more DOCUMENTED lies from the stupid piece of shit. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip75tf$ga3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18741 |
On 4/26/2011 2:05 PM, chrisv wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > >> Your description of him hits the nail squarely on the head. > > Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". > > He describes me as a "liar", which is a lie. You are a liar, turd. And a smarmy, shameless, money-grubbing hypocrite who pretends to be a Linux advocate and open source proponent by night, but by day: "I buy a lot of Windows PC's to use as test stations, and I've been buying refurbished XP machines and have no plans to change." You're a lying, hypocritical piece of shit. Period.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <ip6vmo$5bs$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18726 |
retarded turd "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:isvdr6h2s821v9caa2cqo1q31nt7a0u07m@4ax.com... BAWAWAWA!!!!! it must suck to be a retard your entire life, eh turd? "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a worthless piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. |
| Message-ID | <k7cj88-fvn.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #18726 |
chrisv wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > >>I've written *opinions* that you claim are lies because you're too stupid to >>tell the difference between a statement of fact and an opinion. > > Nope. You are a liar. > >>Your posts are NOT opinions- you have *clearly* posted statements of fact: > > See below, you piece of shit liar. > >>- 'Evidence has been presented.' > > It has. > >>- 'Hadron is Larry Qualig.' > > You are lying again, "Ezekiel". I have not stated that I know for > certain that they are the same. I said I *think* they are the same. > > You can't beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel". > >>These aren't opinions turd > > You are mispresenting things, you shameless liar. > >>- you're claiming FACTS and these are FACTS that >>you know are wrong. > > Nope. You are a bald-face liar, "Ezekiel". > > It is a *fact* that evidence has been presented in the past. > > It is a *fact* that I think that "Hadron" is Larry. > >>This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it turd? > > Nope. This makes *you* a LIAR. Get it, fsckwit? > > When will you learn that you cannot beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel"? Methinks that Zeke still protests too much. Maybe you hit a bullseye. ;-) -- E Pluribus UNIX. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500 |
| Subject | "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. |
| Message-ID | <0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18702 |
Ezekiel wrote:
>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>news:m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com...
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>>Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and
>>>>honest advocates.
>>>
>>>Yep.
>>>
>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>
>>>Evidence has been presented.
>
>Another LIE.
On your part, "Ezekiel".
Another bald-faced "Ezekiel" lie. Documented.
Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
You fscking *hypocrite*.
>Well done turd - you're now covering up your current lies with
>more lies.
Yet more "Ezekiel" bald-faced lies. Documented.
You're now trying to covering up your current lies with more lies,
"Ezekiel".
>Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
In past discussions regarding the issue.
Do you think this is the first time this has been discussed, you
*stupid* fscking asshole??
You think we came to our opinion just "out of the blue", you *stupid*
fscking asshole?
It's a *reasonable* opinion, unlike the *obviously false* claims you
make about us.
>>>You, who spew all sorts of filthy, dishonest attacks and then defend
>>>them as "opinions", now demands "proof" of mine.
>
>Learn to read because I'm not demanding anything turd. *You* are the one
>who is constantly accusing others of lying ("You, who spew dishonest
>attacks..." , "liars like Larry Qualig", etc) -
That's right.
> yet you're the piece of shit liar.
Nope. You are a piece of shit liar, "Ezekiel", as is well-documented,
on *many* issues.
OTOH, I honestly believe Quack is Larry.
>You claimed Hadron is Larry - prove it liar.
>You claimed "evidence" has been presented -
It has.
On more than one occasion, the similarites of what Larry and "Hadron"
post has been discussed.
The "Huh?" attack.
The "What on Earth are you talking about" attack.
The attacks on Andrew's sig.
It goes on.
> prove it liar.
You are the liar, "Ezekiel". Proven time and again.
You can't beat me with yuor lies, "Ezekiel".
>The "prove it" is rhetorical. I don't demand or expect any proof because I
>know that a piece of shit liar like you can not and will not provide
>anything to backup you lies.
LOL!
One side of the trolling fsckwit's mouth: "I can attack you with
*clearly wrong* bullshit and claim it's just 'opinions'."
Other side of the trolling fsckwit's mouth: "Unless you can 'prove it'
you are a 'piece of shit liar'."
*Guffaw* What a *shameless piece of shit liar and hypocrite this
"Ezekiel" is!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. |
| Message-ID | <qmbj88-utm.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #18713 |
chrisv wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > >>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>news:m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com... >>> chrisv wrote: >>> >>>>Ezekiel wrote: >>>> >>>>>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and >>>>>honest advocates. >>>> >>>>Yep. >>>> >>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. >>>> >>>>Evidence has been presented. >> >>Another LIE. > > On your part, "Ezekiel". Yes, methinks she doth protest too much. <snip> -- Windows Breakthrough: It finally booted on the first try. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web