Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread

Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win

Started byRobin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net>
First post2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Last post2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
                    What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
                                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
                                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
                                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
                                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
                                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
                                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
                                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
                                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
                                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
                                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
                                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
                                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
                                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
                                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
                                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
                                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
                                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
                                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
                                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
                                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
                                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
                    Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
                      Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
                        Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
                                  Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
                                    Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
                                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
                                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
                            "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
                              Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
                                Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
                              Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
                                Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
                                  The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
                                    Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
                                    Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
                                      Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
                                        "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
                                            Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
                                              "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
                                                Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
                                                  "Ezekiel" :  chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel" :  chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
                                                  "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
                                                        Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
                                                        Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
                                              Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
                                                Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
                                                  Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
                                Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
                                  Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
                                    Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
                                      Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
                                        Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
                              Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
                            "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
                              Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
                        Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
                        Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
                            [Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
                              Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
                              Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
                                Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
                                  Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
                                    Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
                                Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
                        Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
              [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
                    Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400

Page 1 of 12  [1] 2 3 … 12  Next page →


#18067 — Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win

FromRobin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net>
Date2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
SubjectUbuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win
Message-ID<QMSdnQnBLuBWZi7QnZ2dnUVZ8s6dnZ2d@bt.com>
http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux-
boosted-10000-seat-pc-win
http://bit.ly/eZkDpB

<quote>
Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen 
German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use 
Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations.

The project included the conversion of 3,000 desktop and laptop computers 
in LVM's Muenster HQ with a further 7,000 in the company's agencies 
around Germany. The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-
based claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus 
Notes, Adobe's Reader and the OpenOffice suite.

The news isn't entirely a surprise given that LVM has been using Ubuntu 
for some time. But converting a company's entire install base to use the 
software is still a modest coup.

LVM is also a demanding environment for any OS. The company's workforce 
is bolstered by a small army of self-employed and mobile sales 
representatives that sell insurance at street and living room level. The 
LAS system is described as being used by the sales team in an 'always-on' 
configuration.

The official release made no mention of the operating system being 
displaced but Techworld understands these were running older versions of 
Windows in recent years.

"Many companies are waking up to the realisation that there is an 
alternative to an endless cycle of licence fees that can amount to 
millions of dollars. We believe that the investment that LVM have made in 
converting to Ubuntu by engaging with Canonical will pay off many times," 
said Canonical's VP of business development, Steve George.

Could this another sign of wider mainstream acceptance for Linux or is it 
a one-off?
</quote>


-- 
Big Brother is watching ... so are we

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#18075

FromHadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Date2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Message-ID<78zknfzy3p.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#18067
Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> writes:

> http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux-
> boosted-10000-seat-pc-win
> http://bit.ly/eZkDpB
>
> <quote>
> Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has seen 
> German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs to use 
> Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations.
>
> The project included the conversion of 3,000 desktop and laptop computers 
> in LVM's Muenster HQ with a further 7,000 in the company's agencies 
> around Germany. The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-
> based claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus 
> Notes, Adobe's Reader and the OpenOffice suite.
>
> The news isn't entirely a surprise given that LVM has been using Ubuntu 
> for some time. But converting a company's entire install base to use the 
> software is still a modest coup.
>
> LVM is also a demanding environment for any OS. The company's workforce 
> is bolstered by a small army of self-employed and mobile sales 
> representatives that sell insurance at street and living room level. The 
> LAS system is described as being used by the sales team in an 'always-on' 
> configuration.
>
> The official release made no mention of the operating system being 
> displaced but Techworld understands these were running older versions of 
> Windows in recent years.
>
> "Many companies are waking up to the realisation that there is an 
> alternative to an endless cycle of licence fees that can amount to 
> millions of dollars. We believe that the investment that LVM have made in 
> converting to Ubuntu by engaging with Canonical will pay off many times," 
> said Canonical's VP of business development, Steve George.
>
> Could this another sign of wider mainstream acceptance for Linux or is it 
> a one-off?
> </quote>


Nice twist of case.

http://www.muktware.com/news/24/2011/1036/german-insurance-firm-convert-10000-pcs-ubuntu

"Under the deal LVM will replace its 10,000 PCs to use Ubuntu."

*WILL*

I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the GPL. I
hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with GPL code
then they must release it ...

,----
| The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based
| claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes,
| Adobe’s Reader and the OpenOffice suite.
`----

I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard earned
SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if Homer gets to
see it he will steal it as its "open" ....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18187

FromTomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com>
Date2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Message-ID<20110424234516.463@usenet.drumscum.be>
In reply to#18075
On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
> Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> writes:
>
>> http://www.itworld.com/operating-systems/158431/ubuntu-linux-boosted-10000-seat-pc-win
>> http://bit.ly/eZkDpB
>>
>> <quote>
>> Canonical has taken the wraps off a morale-boosting deal that has
>> seen German insurance giant LVM Versicherungen convert 10,000 PCs
>> to use Ubuntu Linux across the company's operations.
>>
>> The project included the conversion of 3,000 desktop and laptop
>> computers in LVM's Muenster HQ with a further 7,000 in the
>> company's agencies around Germany. The core software used by the
>> company is LAS, a Java- based claims-processing application of its
>> own design, backed by Lotus Notes, Adobe's Reader and the
>> OpenOffice suite.
>>
>> The news isn't entirely a surprise given that LVM has been using
>> Ubuntu for some time. But converting a company's entire install
>> base to use the software is still a modest coup.
>>
>> LVM is also a demanding environment for any OS. The company's
>> workforce is bolstered by a small army of self-employed and mobile
>> sales representatives that sell insurance at street and living room
>> level. The LAS system is described as being used by the sales team
>> in an 'always-on' configuration.
>>
>> The official release made no mention of the operating system being
>> displaced but Techworld understands these were running older
>> versions of Windows in recent years.
>>
>> "Many companies are waking up to the realisation that there is an
>> alternative to an endless cycle of licence fees that can amount to
>> millions of dollars. We believe that the investment that LVM have
>> made in converting to Ubuntu by engaging with Canonical will pay
>> off many times," said Canonical's VP of business development, Steve
>> George.
>>
>> Could this another sign of wider mainstream acceptance for Linux or
>> is it a one-off?
>> </quote>
>
>
> Nice twist of case.
>
> http://www.muktware.com/news/24/2011/1036/german-insurance-firm-convert-10000-pcs-ubuntu
>
> "Under the deal LVM will replace its 10,000 PCs to use Ubuntu."
>
> *WILL*
>
> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the GPL.

What makes you think they should do that?

> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
> GPL code then they must release it ...

What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software with
GPL code?

> ,----
>| The core software used by the company is LAS, a Java-based
>| claims-processing application of its own design, backed by Lotus Notes,
>| Adobe’s Reader and the OpenOffice suite.
> `----
>
> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard
> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if
> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" ....

Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard
earned' code for free?

Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll?

-- 
I'm not a bad guy! I work hard, and I love my kids. So why should
I spend half my Sunday hearing about how I'm going to Hell?
	~ Homer J. Simpson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18204

FromSinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com>
Date2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Message-ID<9gne88-7vc.ln1@home.harry.net>
In reply to#18187
On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:

(for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )

>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the GPL.
>
> What makes you think they should do that?

Idiocy?

>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>
> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software with
> GPL code?

What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if they
augment it wirh GPLed code?

>> I feel sure they will be more than willing to release their hard
>> earned SW code base to their competititors for free... Hell, if
>> Homer gets to see it he will steal it as its "open" ....
>
> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard
> earned' code for free?
>
> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll?

If that was all that was needed, s/h/it could have trolled anything. It
looks more like Queef was looking specifically for another opportunity
to be wrong.

I guess 200 times a day isn't enough.

Have another drink, Larry. You're only getting at being stupid.

-- 
Why can't we just spell it orderves?
Aspire One, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 10.10
Friends don't let friends use Windows

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18216

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Message-ID<ip2cv7$fui$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18204
Sinister Midget III wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>
>> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard
>> earned' code for free?
>>
>> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll?
>
> If that was all that was needed, s/h/it could have trolled anything. It
> looks more like Queef was looking specifically for another opportunity
> to be wrong.
>
> I guess 200 times a day isn't enough.
>
> Have another drink, Larry. You're only getting at being stupid.

I used to think Liquored-Up Larry was dipping his whiskers in alcohol.

But I now believe he's a Sterno drinker.

-- 
<Roy> Linux sucks and I have decided it will never work properly so have
installed XP.
<Liarnut> Phnaar, phnarr, you go tell 'em Roy. That sure is some real
goddarn good 'adferrcating youse is doing boy! You a shows them finicky
tootin Windoes shillickens whose a running this chicken coup!<GRIN>
<Terry Porter> : Goddamme Roy mate, you show know how to bamboozle these
Sheilas! Good one! Fair Dinkum! Oy Mate! Down Liarnut, down Oy say!
   -- "Hadron", gibbering and capering in <gi5n7p$lk1$1@reader.motzarella.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18289

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Message-ID<mdtf88-2ca.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org>
In reply to#18216
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Sinister Midget III wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>>
>>> Why should a company merely using GNU/Linux release their 'hard
>>> earned' code for free?
>>>
>>> Oh, you were just looking for an excuse to troll?
>>
>> If that was all that was needed, s/h/it could have trolled anything. It
>> looks more like Queef was looking specifically for another opportunity
>> to be wrong.
>>
>> I guess 200 times a day isn't enough.
>>
>> Have another drink, Larry. You're only getting at being stupid.
>
> I used to think Liquored-Up Larry was dipping his whiskers in alcohol.

Larry "Wishful Drinking" Hadron.

> But I now believe he's a Sterno drinker.

Is that why he gets heated & froths! 

-- 
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18283

FromTomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com>
Date2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Message-ID<20110425102802.994@usenet.drumscum.be>
In reply to#18204
On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Sinister Midget
III:
> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>
>>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the
>>> GPL.
>>
>> What makes you think they should do that?
>
> Idiocy?
>
>>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>>
>> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software
>> with GPL code?
>
> What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if
> they augment it wirh GPLed code?

Rofl, I even didn't read it like that. But yes, he's actually saying
that software 'augmented' with GPL code must be /released/. What
nonsense.

In any case, nowhere it says that they will incorporate GPL'ed code
into their own software. They will simply use GNU/Linux as the
platform to run it on. And that is brilliant. And that's why Hadron is
being a nasty prick. He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a
large company, because that means he's wrong about it being crap and
not fit for general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general)
is *not* crap, and very fit for general usage.

-- 
Nice party, Hapsburg... I see a lot of familiar face lifts.
	~ Frank Drebin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18295

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Message-ID<ip3hi3$ng9$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18283
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Sinister Midget
> III:
>> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>>
>>>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the
>>>> GPL.
>>>
>>> What makes you think they should do that?
>>
>> Idiocy?
>>
>>>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>>>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>>>
>>> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software
>>> with GPL code?
>>
>> What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if
>> they augment it wirh GPLed code?
>
> Rofl, I even didn't read it like that. But yes, he's actually saying
> that software 'augmented' with GPL code must be /released/. What
> nonsense.
>
> In any case, nowhere it says that they will incorporate GPL'ed code
> into their own software. They will simply use GNU/Linux as the
> platform to run it on. And that is brilliant. And that's why Hadron is
> being a nasty prick.

"Hadron", a nasty prick?  Say it ain't so!

> He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a
> large company, because that means he's wrong about it being crap and
> not fit for general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general)
> is *not* crap, and very fit for general usage.

You meant "Hadron" is <gasp!> a *liar*?

-- 
Everything you say is overshadowed by your COLA persona of liar and arse
kisser.  You're a piece of work Liarmutt. You know full well I know Debian
very well and here you are sucking up to a useless prick like High Plains
Hypocrite making out I know nothing. And why? God knows.  I can not recall
the last subject involving technical issues with Linux where I was wildly
incorrect or wrong. And you know it. I was right about CUPS. And you know
it. I was right about NVidia and you know it. I could go on. All High Plains
Hypocrite does is post his stupid FAQ.  But I enjoy the gang bringing it on
- it's hilarious.
   -- "Hadron".  Copied from Google Groups.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18298

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Message-ID<vn0g88-lig.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org>
In reply to#18295
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Sinister Midget
>> III:
>>> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>>>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>
>>> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>>>
>>>>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the
>>>>> GPL.
>>>>
>>>> What makes you think they should do that?
>>>
>>> Idiocy?
>>>
>>>>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>>>>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>>>>
>>>> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software
>>>> with GPL code?
>>>
>>> What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if
>>> they augment it wirh GPLed code?
>>
>> Rofl, I even didn't read it like that. But yes, he's actually saying
>> that software 'augmented' with GPL code must be /released/. What
>> nonsense.
>>
>> In any case, nowhere it says that they will incorporate GPL'ed code
>> into their own software. They will simply use GNU/Linux as the
>> platform to run it on. And that is brilliant. And that's why Hadron is
>> being a nasty prick.
>
> "Hadron", a nasty prick?  Say it ain't so!

>> He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a
>> large company, because that means he's wrong about it being crap and
>> not fit for general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general)
>> is *not* crap, and very fit for general usage.

Fact is, the Hadron troll couldn't get Ubuntu to work properly. In fact
he whined & moaned *so* much in teh Ubuntu group that most of the regs
binned him after a while, while others challenged the troll to make his
own distro.

Huge wrote
Do you think you could stop responding to Hardon, please?
JG Miller:  Sorry.  I will try and restrain myself in future.
John F Morse: Thanks from me too.

Perhaps, but I'm not a confirmed liar, troll, MS-shill and waste of
bandwidth.  What have you ever contributed to the world apart from your
cretinous babblings in various newsgroups (where you are mostly
killfiled)?
Christopher Hunter - ,alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Message-ID:   <xczgj.154680$cJ3.19859@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>

You really have gotten much worse lately, you should seek help or stop not 
taking your meds.
Message-ID: <Xns9E418456D2920arcademastergmailcom@69.16.186.8
SINNER - alt.os.linux.ubuntu

And just what have _you_ contributed with in this thread, apart from
your usual bile? Now - begone troll
Jon Solberg -  alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Message-ID: <slrnifdbgo.4lo.news@jonsolberg.se>

You gave no advice at all.  Just more grandstanding and whinnying...
Message-ID:   <S5ydnQgj9s_02-ranZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@giganews.com>
From:   Joe <joe@hits-buffalo.no.spam.com>
Newsgroups:   alt.os.linux.ubuntu

All you're doing is bitching, whining and moaning and generally getting
on people's such as my own's nerves.
Stephan Rose - alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Message-ID:   <arydnWqYufdYUPvanZ2dnUVZ8sbinZ2d@giganews.com>

I just wanted to see what Hadron would answer, 
since he /complains about everything/ in Linux.
Notice no answer.
caver1 - alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Message-ID:    <47fac17c$0$17354$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>

Just don't read the once weekly post if it upsets you so much. By the
time this one post becomes an endless fucking thread that is even more
difficult to avoid. Yes, your griping about that one weekly post. Yes,
seriously. Now /fuck off/.
NoStop - alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Message-ID:   <fiC9j.82$0m1.21@pd7urf2no>
 
It just makes him even more of an asshole.  Reading even a quote of his
posts is as unpleasant as discovering dogshit in the house.
-- AZ Nomad -- aolu
M-ID: <slrnic3ldk.jvf.aznomad.3@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net>


> You meant "Hadron" is <gasp!> a *liar*?

Yup, in short "Hadron is a nasty lying prick". :-)



-- 
Windows Breakthrough: It finally booted on the first try.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18423

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Message-ID<C9DAD694.96085%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#18283
TomB stated in post 20110425102802.994@usenet.drumscum.be on 4/25/11 1:35
AM:

> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Sinister Midget
> III:
>> On 2011-04-24, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>>> On 2011-04-24, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>> 
>> (for a loose interpetation of "brain"           ^^^^^  )
>> 
>>>> I wonder when they will release their "core software" under the
>>>> GPL.
>>> 
>>> What makes you think they should do that?
>> 
>> Idiocy?
>> 
>>>> I hope someone has warned them that if they augment their SW with
>>>> GPL code then they must release it ...
>>> 
>>> What makes you think they are going to 'augment' there software
>>> with GPL code?
>> 
>> What makes the retard "think" they have to release their code if
>> they augment it wirh GPLed code?
> 
> Rofl, I even didn't read it like that. But yes, he's actually saying
> that software 'augmented' with GPL code must be /released/. What
> nonsense.
> 
> In any case, nowhere it says that they will incorporate GPL'ed code
> into their own software. They will simply use GNU/Linux as the
> platform to run it on. And that is brilliant. And that's why Hadron is
> being a nasty prick. He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a
> large company, because that means he's wrong about it being crap and
> not fit for general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general)
> is *not* crap, and very fit for general usage.

Fit.  Yes.  As good of an environment as the alternatives - no reason to
think so (and the evidence suggests otherwise).


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18431

FromAn Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid>
Date2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Message-ID<pan.2011.04.25.15.07.13@friend.com.invalid>
In reply to#18283
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:35:06 +0000, TomB chiseled
20110425102802.994@usenet.drumscum.be in stone using Trajan:

> And that's why Hadron is being a nasty
> prick. He just can't grok that Ubuntu will be used by a large company,
> because that means he's wrong about it being crap and not fit for
> general usage. Fact is: Ubuntu (and GNU/Linux in general) is *not* crap,
> and very fit for general usage.

I certainly couldn't use it in my classes if it were not fit for general 
usage. And I wouldn't use it for engraving music if it didn't produce 
professional quality results that have caused other publishers to ask me 
how I produced the final product. They thought it was merely the font I 
was using, and while Feta is gorgeous, you can't drop it into Finale and 
get similar results. That's because Lilypond uses a different paradigm 
for engraving.

The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the 
brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18436

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Message-ID<ip439d$51t$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18431
On 4/25/2011 12:07 PM, An Old Friend wrote:

> The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the
> brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon.


Gawd.  Eat some red meat why don'tcha... and read some Elmore Leonard.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18539

FromAn Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid>
Date2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Message-ID<1377902042325458602.307211an.old-friend.com.invalid@news.x-privat.org>
In reply to#18436
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 4/25/2011 12:07 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
> 
> > The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the
> > brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon.
> 
> 
> Gawd.  Eat some red meat why don'tcha... and read some Elmore Leonard.
> 
> 
> 

O HAI! -_-

<waves hand>

Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so many to
choose from, I can't decide ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18543

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
Message-ID<ip4p87$fl2$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18539
On 4/25/2011 6:17 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
> DFS<nospam@dfs.com>  wrote:
>> On 4/25/2011 12:07 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>>
>>> The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the
>>> brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon.
>>
>>
>> Gawd.  Eat some red meat why don'tcha... and read some Elmore Leonard.
>>
>>
>>
>
> O HAI! -_-
>
> <waves hand>
>
> Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so many to
> choose from, I can't decide ...

Is there a heterosexual font?




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18582 — What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromAn Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid>
Date2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
SubjectWhat fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<pan.2011.04.26.01.23.18@friend.com.invalid>
In reply to#18543
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:31:46 -0400, DFS chiseled
ip4p87$fl2$2@dont-email.me in stone using Trajan:

> On 4/25/2011 6:17 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com>  wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2011 12:07 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>>>
>>>> The more I use Scribus, the more I love it. I feel it's one of the
>>>> brightest of the shining stars in the Open Source pantheon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Gawd.  Eat some red meat why don'tcha... and read some Elmore Leonard.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> O HAI! -_-
>>
>> <waves hand>
>>
>> Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so many
>> to choose from, I can't decide ...
> 
> Is there a heterosexual font?

I suppose Akzidenz-Grotesk could be you. :P

I'm Century Schoolbook, of course. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18593 — Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromHomer <usenet@slated.org>
Date2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
SubjectRe: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<baqh88-meh.ln1@sky.matrix>
In reply to#18582
Verily I say unto thee, that An Old Friend spake thusly:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:31:46 -0400, DFS chiseled
> ip4p87$fl2$2@dont-email.me in stone using Trajan:
>> On 4/25/2011 6:17 PM, An Old Friend wrote:

>>> Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so
>>> many to choose from, I can't decide ...
>> 
>> Is there a heterosexual font?
>
> I suppose Akzidenz-Grotesk could be you. :P
>
> I'm Century Schoolbook, of course. :)

I'd be the Liberation font.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_fonts

Here's one for DooFy:

http://www.sostars.com/tannenberg-fett-nazi-font/

-- 
K.                           | "Linux hackers are on a mission
http://slated.org            |  from God" ~ The Vatican
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | 
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 70 days  | http://tinyurl.com/linuxmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18621 — Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
SubjectRe: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<ip66i6$4uu$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18593
Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Verily I say unto thee, that An Old Friend spake thusly:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:31:46 -0400, DFS chiseled
>> ip4p87$fl2$2@dont-email.me in stone using Trajan:
>>> On 4/25/2011 6:17 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>
>>>> Oh DFS, if you were a font, which one would you be? There are so
>>>> many to choose from, I can't decide ...
>>> 
>>> Is there a heterosexual font?
>>
>> I suppose Akzidenz-Grotesk could be you. :P
>>
>> I'm Century Schoolbook, of course. :)
>
> I'd be the Liberation font.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_fonts
>
> Here's one for DooFy:
>
> http://www.sostars.com/tannenberg-fett-nazi-font/

Hail the sig!

Anyway, I've been using Windows 7's Segoe UI font on my fluxbox desktop
lately, but I've grabbed the Coconut font from my Palm Pixi and it
looks even better.

-- 
I want to reach your mind -- where is it currently located?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18623 — Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
SubjectRe: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<ip67c5$4uu$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18593
Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Here's one for DooFy:
>
> http://www.sostars.com/tannenberg-fett-nazi-font/

I noticed the install instructions for Linux there:

   Copy the font files (.ttf or .otf) to fonts:/// in the File manager.

Is that URL a Nautilus or KDE thing?

-- 
I'm free -- and freedom tastes of reality.
		-- The Who

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18910 — Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromHomer <usenet@slated.org>
Date2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
SubjectRe: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<4spj88-5tv.ln1@sky.matrix>
In reply to#18623
Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
> Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Here's one for DooFy:
>>
>> http://www.sostars.com/tannenberg-fett-nazi-font/
>
> I noticed the install instructions for Linux there:
>
>    Copy the font files (.ttf or .otf) to fonts:/// in the File
>    manager.
>
> Is that URL a Nautilus or KDE thing?

I assume it's GVFS (Gnome Virtual File System):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GVFS

KDE has something similar called kioslaves, and other systems can use
various FUSE filesystems instead.

It sort of reminds me of the Amiga "assign" command, e.g.:

assign TODO: DH0:Stuff/documents
dir TODO:
homedoc1.ptx homedoc2.ptx homedoc3.ptx

Where DH0: is roughly the Amiga equivalent of "C:", only more flexible,
since you can set the "device node" name to anything you want when
partitioning it. Note: this is not the volume label, which can also be
anything you like (e.g. "Workbench").

Even cooler:

assign TODO: DH1:Work/documents add
dir TODO:
homedoc1.ptx homedoc2.ptx homedoc3.ptx
workdoc1.ptx workdoc2.ptx workdoc3.ptx

You can achieve something similar to the first example in Linux with the
"mount --bind" option, but AFAICT there's no way to "add" mountpoints
together into single "bound" mountpoint, as with the second example,
since each subsequent binding replaces any already present on the
target. Presumably it could be done with FUSE though.

-- 
K.                           | "Linux hackers are on a mission
http://slated.org            |  from God" ~ The Vatican
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | 
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 70 days  | http://tinyurl.com/linuxmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18941 — Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
SubjectRe: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<ip7i1b$g0e$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18910
Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Here's one for DooFy:
>>>
>>> http://www.sostars.com/tannenberg-fett-nazi-font/
>>
>> I noticed the install instructions for Linux there:
>>
>>    Copy the font files (.ttf or .otf) to fonts:/// in the File
>>    manager.
>>
>> Is that URL a Nautilus or KDE thing?
>
> I assume it's GVFS (Gnome Virtual File System):
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GVFS
>
> KDE has something similar called kioslaves, and other systems can use
> various FUSE filesystems instead.

It's amazingly difficult to find "fonts:///"

> It sort of reminds me of the Amiga "assign" command, e.g.:
>
> assign TODO: DH0:Stuff/documents
> dir TODO:
> homedoc1.ptx homedoc2.ptx homedoc3.ptx
>
> Where DH0: is roughly the Amiga equivalent of "C:", only more flexible,
> since you can set the "device node" name to anything you want when
> partitioning it. Note: this is not the volume label, which can also be
> anything you like (e.g. "Workbench").
>
> Even cooler:
>
> assign TODO: DH1:Work/documents add
> dir TODO:
> homedoc1.ptx homedoc2.ptx homedoc3.ptx
> workdoc1.ptx workdoc2.ptx workdoc3.ptx
>
> You can achieve something similar to the first example in Linux with the
> "mount --bind" option, but AFAICT there's no way to "add" mountpoints
> together into single "bound" mountpoint, as with the second example,
> since each subsequent binding replaces any already present on the
> target. Presumably it could be done with FUSE though.

I give.  The Amiga was *much* cooler than the Atari ST.

-- 
No motorized vehicles allowed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 12  [1] 2 3 … 12  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web