Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread

Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win

Started byRobin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net>
First post2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Last post2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
                    What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
                                      Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
                                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
                                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
                                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
                                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
                                            Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
                                              Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
                                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
                                        Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
                                          Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
                                Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
                                  Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
                                    Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
                                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
                                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
                                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
                                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
                                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
                                    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
                                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
                                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
                                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
                                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
                                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
                      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
                        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
                          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
                            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
                              Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
                Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
                  Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
                    Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
                      Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
                        Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
                                  Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
                                    Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
                                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
                                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
                            "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
                              Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
                                Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
                              Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
                                Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
                                  The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
                                    Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
                                    Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
                                      Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
                                        Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
                                        "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
                                            Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
                                              "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
                                                Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
                                                  "Ezekiel" :  chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel" :  chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
                                                  "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
                                                      Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
                                                        Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
                                                        Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
                                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
                                                    Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
                                                  Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
                                                Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
                                              Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
                                                Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
                                                  Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
                                                    Re: chrisv's  complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
                                          Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
                                Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
                                  Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
                                    Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
                                      Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
                                        Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
                              Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
                            "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
                              Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
                          Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
                        Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
                        Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
                            [Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
                              Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
                              Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
                                Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
                                  Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
                                    Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
                                Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
                            Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
                              Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
                                Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
                      Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
                        Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
                          Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
              [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
                    Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
                Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
                  Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
    Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
      Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
        Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
          Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
            Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400

Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12  Next page →


#18654 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip6m6d$k7f$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18649
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:v08vuxhytj.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes:
>
>> "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com...
>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>> It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like
>>>> him are the ones with all the credibility.
>>>>
>>>
>>> and I am sure that a lieing piece of shit like you has  proof that he is
>>> Larry Qualig.
>>>
>>
>> chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and
>> honest advocates. So I'll make this real simple for you:
>>
>>    "...  Larry Qualig's upside-down world, ... clueless liars like him... 
>> "
>>
>> Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.  If you can't then 
>> you
>> are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are.
>>
>>> "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon.
>
> chrisv is simply a useless turd. I am not and never have been Larry
> anything. He knows it, his new lickspittle Ahlstrom knows it but they
> think if they repeat it often enough it will become the truth.
>
> Only William Poaster is more useless than the chrisv turd.
>
> He needs flushing away.
>

Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk these 
clowns created for themselves.

Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to 
lie about it and claim that you're him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18696 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<l7sdr6pdvv8o49fnr8aft3lbp036fo8mpb@4ax.com>
In reply to#18654
Ezekiel wrote:

>Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk these 
>clowns created for themselves.

Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.

>Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to 
>lie about it and claim that you're him.

Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.  

I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.

-- 
"(The iPad is) only limited and locked down by some artificial
definition of the term that's completely irrelevant to most every
user."  -  trolling fsckwit Ezekiel, lying his ass off

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18770 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip73vt$jkm$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18696
On 4/26/2011 12:22 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk these
>> clowns created for themselves.
>
> Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
> and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.
>
>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to
>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>
> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.
>
> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.


You have your "reasons", turd, but I'm sure that like most of your 
posts, they're extremely lame and stupid.

Slit 'em lengthwise.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18779 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip745v$t5m$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18770
"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:ip73vt$jkm$4@dont-email.me...
> On 4/26/2011 12:22 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk 
>>> these
>>> clowns created for themselves.
>>
>> Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
>> and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.
>>
>>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going 
>>> to
>>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>>
>> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.
>>
>> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.
>
>
> You have your "reasons", turd, but I'm sure that like most of your posts, 
> they're extremely lame and stupid.
>
> Slit 'em lengthwise.
>
>
>
>

Nobody is expecting him to "prove" anything "100%"  -  showing this 
"evidence" he claims exists is plenty enough.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18862 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<dh7er6do88he5ha04lfj0g04u8bpncdtr9@4ax.com>
In reply to#18779
Ezekiel wrote:

>Nobody is expecting him to "prove" anything "100%"  -  showing this 
>"evidence" he claims exists is plenty enough.

I'm not digging-though the Google archives to prove that I've
discussed why I think Larry is "Hadron".

I know that I have discussed my reasons.

It's common sense that we would have discussed the reasons.

I don't have to prove that I have, to rebut the insinuation of a piece
of shit liar like "Ezekiel".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18780 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip7472$ta9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18770
"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:ip73vt$jkm$4@dont-email.me...
> On 4/26/2011 12:22 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk 
>>> these
>>> clowns created for themselves.
>>
>> Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
>> and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.
>>
>>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going 
>>> to
>>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>>
>> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.
>>
>> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.
>
>
> You have your "reasons", turd, but I'm sure that like most of your posts, 
> they're extremely lame and stupid.
>
> Slit 'em lengthwise.
>
>
>
>

Nobody is expecting him to "prove" anything "100%"  -  showing this 
"evidence" he claims exists is plenty enough.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18821 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip76cq$ga3$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18780
On 4/26/2011 2:50 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
> "DFS"<nospam@dfs.com>  wrote in message news:ip73vt$jkm$4@dont-email.me...
>> On 4/26/2011 12:22 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk
>>>> these
>>>> clowns created for themselves.
>>>
>>> Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
>>> and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.
>>>
>>>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going
>>>> to
>>>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>>>
>>> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.
>>>
>>> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.
>>
>>
>> You have your "reasons", turd, but I'm sure that like most of your posts,
>> they're extremely lame and stupid.
>>
>> Slit 'em lengthwise.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Nobody is expecting him to "prove" anything "100%"  -  showing this
> "evidence" he claims exists is plenty enough.


He has none.  There is not the slightest evidence whatsoever that you're 
Hadron.

The silly Linosuck does the same thing (Larry "Hadron" Qualig hee hee).


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18871 — [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

FromChris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>
Date2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Subject[Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<ip78tc$jf4$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18696
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk these 
>>clowns created for themselves.
>
> Facts don't seem to interfere with your lies about use being "sheeple"
> and "freetards" and "hypocrites", you POS.
>
>>Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to 
>>lie about it and claim that you're him.
>
> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.  
>
> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.

"Hadron" lies most of the time.  Why should we believe his denials?

Anyway, this is an extraordinarily ugly thread.

-- 
I'd never join any club that would have the likes of me as a member.
		-- Groucho Marx

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18880 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<1bceqiwfjw04x$.430kpjm9abjt$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#18871
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:10:28 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Laying down with pigs...

We are not interested in you sexual conquests Chris Ahlstrom.

BTW what is it with Linux advocates and bestiality?
Seems to be quite a connection there.






-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#19106 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<vadgr6l9oe91isl7huc0e2cs8e3rmec60v@4ax.com>
In reply to#18871
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. 
>>
>> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.  
>>
>> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.
>
>"Hadron" lies most of the time.  Why should we believe his denials?

And, obviously, this is not about us having concrete evidence that
would make even a filthy lying Wintroll conceed defeat.

Hell, those fsckwits can't even be convinced of Microshaft's unfair
"business tactics".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#19112 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

FromWilliam Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Date2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<eepl88-72f.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org>
In reply to#19106
chrisv wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>>Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. 
>>>
>>> Just because I can't prove it 100% doesn't make it a lie, fsckwit.  
>>>
>>> I have my reasons, which I have discussed previously.
>>
>>"Hadron" lies most of the time.  Why should we believe his denials?
>
> And, obviously, this is not about us having concrete evidence that
> would make even a filthy lying Wintroll conceed defeat.
>
> Hell, those fsckwits can't even be convinced of Microshaft's unfair
> "business tactics".

Microsoft has been declared a monopoly legally on at least 2
continents. It has been shown to wield monopoly power, and to have
abused it. Repeatedly.

<quote> I see no illegally maintained monopoly. <unquote>
Hadron - Message-ID: <fk8pu0$ovj$5@registered.motzarella.org>


-- 
"!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW"
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#19402 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<ipaltq$6vl$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#19112
On 4/27/2011 11:30 AM, William Poaster wrote:


> Microsoft has been declared a monopoly legally on at least 2
> continents. It has been shown to wield monopoly power, and to have
> abused it. Repeatedly.

monopoly?

But yesterday 7 showed us that Linux is now shipped on 1/3 of all PCs.

And you, Dumb Willie, have repeatedly claimed "Brazil switched to Linux" 
and "The State of Israel switched to OpenOffice".


When will you idiotic "advocates" make up your minds.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#19467 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs...
Message-ID<1r0799wmkdl0t$.19whhk2y4jhr.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#19402
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:11:45 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On 4/27/2011 11:30 AM, William Poaster wrote:
> 
> 
>> Microsoft has been declared a monopoly legally on at least 2
>> continents. It has been shown to wield monopoly power, and to have
>> abused it. Repeatedly.
> 
> monopoly?
> 
> But yesterday 7 showed us that Linux is now shipped on 1/3 of all PCs.
> 
> And you, Dumb Willie, have repeatedly claimed "Brazil switched to Linux" 
> and "The State of Israel switched to OpenOffice".
> 
> 
> When will you idiotic "advocates" make up your minds.

Most of them don't have a mind.

They have nothing but a brain stem.

Just enough gray matter to support life and little else.
-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#19118 — Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)...

From"global warming" <hot@nospam.com>
Date2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
SubjectRe: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)...
Message-ID<ip9d7u$7i6$4@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#19106
piece of shit liar "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:vadgr6l9oe91isl7huc0e2cs8e3rmec60v@4ax.com...

more DOCUMENTED lies from the dumbest turd in the septic tank.

"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18761 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

Fromflatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<h6fsez6s4yqm.10yq7h3d4b9c6$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#18654
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:51:51 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:v08vuxhytj.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
>> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ip6dg5$j9o$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>>
>>>> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:cpddr6d85s33djcsi9n87pt7l8gi5685al@4ax.com...
>>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It's Larry Qualig's upside-down world, where the clueless liars like
>>>>> him are the ones with all the credibility.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and I am sure that a lieing piece of shit like you has  proof that he is
>>>> Larry Qualig.
>>>>
>>>
>>> chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and
>>> honest advocates. So I'll make this real simple for you:
>>>
>>>    "...  Larry Qualig's upside-down world, ... clueless liars like him... 
>>> "
>>>
>>> Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.  If you can't then 
>>> you
>>> are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are.
>>>
>>>> "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a stupid piece of shit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm sure he'll be providing proof for his claim real soon.
>>
>> chrisv is simply a useless turd. I am not and never have been Larry
>> anything. He knows it, his new lickspittle Ahlstrom knows it but they
>> think if they repeat it often enough it will become the truth.
>>
>> Only William Poaster is more useless than the chrisv turd.
>>
>> He needs flushing away.
>>
> 
> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk these 
> clowns created for themselves.
> 
> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to 
> lie about it and claim that you're him.

He does seem to be going on a vendetta.
All the new, false threads he keeps posting indicate he has serious
mental problems.

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18772 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

From"robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip741u$hdh$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#18761
"flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message 
news:h6fsez6s4yqm.10yq7h3d4b9c6$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:51:51 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk 
>> these
>> clowns created for themselves.
>>
>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going to
>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>
> He does seem to be going on a vendetta.
> All the new, false threads he keeps posting indicate he has serious
> mental problems.
>

Like I said earlier today - it's very simple so I'll make this easy.

He claimed that Hadron is LQ and he claimed that "evidence" of this had been 
posted.

Both of these claims are lies. The solution is extremely easy - let's see 
the "chrisv" turd backup either one of these two claims.

But the liar can't backup these claims anymore so than Dumb Willy can backup 
his lies about "MS and their SEC filing" or Rex can backup his $8B/year in 
fines.

The piece of shit lied, he got caught lying, and now he's whining and 
shrieking like a baby with a wet diaper.

If the "chrisv" shit-stain doesn't like being called a liar the solution is 
very simple - let's see this evidence he claims has been posted here.




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18782 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<ip748i$ti4$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18772
"robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ip741u$hdh$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>
> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message 
> news:h6fsez6s4yqm.10yq7h3d4b9c6$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:51:51 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Facts don't seem to interfere with the little "he's Larry" circle-jerk 
>>> these
>>> clowns created for themselves.
>>>
>>> Maybe you are - maybe you're not but I have no idea. But I'm not going 
>>> to
>>> lie about it and claim that you're him.
>>
>> He does seem to be going on a vendetta.
>> All the new, false threads he keeps posting indicate he has serious
>> mental problems.
>>
>
> Like I said earlier today - it's very simple so I'll make this easy.
>
> He claimed that Hadron is LQ and he claimed that "evidence" of this had 
> been posted.
>
> Both of these claims are lies. The solution is extremely easy - let's see 
> the "chrisv" turd backup either one of these two claims.
>
> But the liar can't backup these claims anymore so than Dumb Willy can 
> backup his lies about "MS and their SEC filing" or Rex can backup his 
> $8B/year in fines.
>
> The piece of shit lied, he got caught lying, and now he's whining and 
> shrieking like a baby with a wet diaper.
>
> If the "chrisv" shit-stain doesn't like being called a liar the solution 
> is very simple - let's see this evidence he claims has been posted here.
>
>


He can't prove shit and he knows it. He's a proven liar.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18863 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy.
Message-ID<009er65ebh4kffsvrioiccsq1s8fb74t8b@4ax.com>
In reply to#18782
Ezekiel wrote:

>He can't prove shit and he knows it.

Maybe I can't.  I know I'm not going to try.

> He's a proven liar.

Yet *another* bald-faced "Ezekiel" lie.  Documented.

Nope.  No such thing has been established.

My inability to prove that I've posted my evidence in here does not
make me a liar, you piece of shit liar.

Man, you *really* made your filthy *lie* clear-cut, here.  Thanks,
fsckwit!

Poor "Ezekiel".  Don't you know that you can't beat me with your lies?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18650 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<goldr6phrllmgq6pkrgrff31d50a63b5ev@4ax.com>
In reply to#18647
Ezekiel wrote:

> If you can't then you are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are.

Oh, and the only lying pieces of shit, like you and "osok", have ever
leveled said any such thing.

-- 
"This advocate thing about predicting the death of MS/Apple and the
rise of Linux desktops went from nonsense to stupid to downright
ridiculous."  -  trolling fsckwit Ezekiel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#18655 — Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Date2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
SubjectRe: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win)
Message-ID<ip6m6g$k7f$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#18650
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:goldr6phrllmgq6pkrgrff31d50a63b5ev@4ax.com...
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> If you can't then you are a lying piece of shit just like people say you 
>> are.
>
> Oh, and the only lying pieces of shit, like

<quote>
 "...  Larry Qualig's upside-down world, ... clueless liars like him... "

 Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.  If you can't then you 
are a lying piece of shit just like people say you are.
</quote>

I'll take this as a NO - you have zero proof and a admission that you're a 
proven liar for continually claiming that he is.

We're done here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 11 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web