Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31980 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-10 15:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-06-15 08:21 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 144 — 39 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:07 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 18:24 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-10 23:54 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-11 06:56 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-10 23:27 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 01:48 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-10 23:36 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 18:36 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 01:37 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-11 12:25 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 23:59 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-10 18:26 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 01:41 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-11 12:26 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-11 16:23 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-11 18:49 -0500
[Troll] No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-11 06:58 -0400
Re: [Troll] No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-11 17:25 +0200
Re: [Troll] No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 18:21 +0200
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 09:29 -0700
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-11 18:50 -0500
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 05:48 +0000
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-12 10:43 +0100
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-12 09:54 -0400
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 12:08 -0400
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:40 -0400
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:48 -0700
Re: No troll too old to rehash for the umpteenth time DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 17:46 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-11 13:18 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 09:09 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-11 19:59 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-11 19:51 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 14:27 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-11 12:33 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-11 15:33 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-11 18:14 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 01:01 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-12 11:33 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2011-06-12 14:17 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:13 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-12 20:17 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 00:22 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:17 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lyrik <jenserikbech@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:28 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 01:42 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2011-06-10 23:30 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:13 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-06-13 02:59 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2011-06-12 22:10 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 22:02 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 01:20 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:20 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 00:24 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? 1PW <1PW@INVALID.net> - 2011-06-13 03:58 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Wolf K <wekirch@sympatico.ca> - 2011-06-13 08:15 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:55 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? 1PW <1PW@INVALID.net> - 2011-06-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2011-06-13 09:19 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 09:45 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-13 17:33 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 09:24 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2011-06-13 21:38 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2011-06-14 17:29 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 20:10 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2011-06-16 10:19 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 21:12 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 09:22 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-06-11 12:26 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 09:06 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-11 17:14 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 09:20 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-11 19:46 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-11 23:13 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-11 23:27 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-11 23:42 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-11 19:05 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-12 05:29 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 04:22 -0500
Re: Who SERIOUSLY takes the trolling f#ckwit Dopez99 SERIOUSLY? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-12 10:45 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-11 22:18 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-11 18:48 -0500
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Kari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-12 11:20 +0300
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 04:23 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-12 12:56 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2011-06-12 18:22 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-12 13:40 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Aragorn <aragorn@chatfactory.invalid> - 2011-06-13 12:02 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 09:17 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 12:46 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? hanukas <jukka@liimatta.org> - 2011-06-13 00:36 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-12 11:22 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-12 11:49 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 04:25 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-12 12:54 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 12:46 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nowhere> - 2011-06-12 14:21 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-12 13:45 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:11 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:42 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-13 08:04 -0500
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2011-06-12 08:27 -0400
Re: Who seriously considers Dopez99 a SERIOUS POSTER, seriously William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-12 14:07 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 10:00 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? hanukas <jukka@liimatta.org> - 2011-06-13 00:45 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:42 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 16:17 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:59 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 09:16 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lyrik <jenserikbech@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:15 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? John Slade <hhitman86@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-13 21:20 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 03:58 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 12:02 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-06-14 15:09 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2011-06-14 07:43 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:21 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-15 08:23 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? John Slade <hhitman86@pacbell.net> - 2011-06-15 21:08 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:20 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-06-15 11:19 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:00 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-15 22:46 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 22:52 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-06-16 02:16 +0200
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? JeffM <jeffm_@email.com> - 2011-06-15 18:14 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 06:18 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:24 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 13:31 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:19 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:28 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 12:46 -0700
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-15 08:25 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:37 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-15 08:24 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-15 08:23 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 22:26 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2011-06-14 18:37 -0400
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 23:38 +0100
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 23:22 +0000
Re: Who SERIOUSLY uses Linux for SERIOUS WORK, seriously? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-15 08:21 +0100
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 18:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <it8nrt$9ik$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32817 |
RayLopez99 wrote: > On Jun 14, 7:20 am, John Slade <hhitma...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On 6/10/2011 3:07 PM, RayLopez99 wrote: >> >>> Again, I ask the timeless rhetorical question: who is seriously using >>> Linux for Serious Work? Since the first time I've posted this thread, >>> from years ago, only ONE (1) person has shown me they do Serious Work >>> (a defined term--for you first time viewers--I'm talking about an OS >>> that supports the Office Suite). This one person was a contract >>> manager who insisted on using Linux. He was valuable enough to his >>> organization that they let him get away with this stunt, and he ended >>> up converting all Linux work into Office format using some emulator >>> like Wine I suppose, or perhaps Linux somehow can export to .docx >>> format, though I don't see how. >>> One person in all these years. Just one. >>> Case closed. >> Linux is used to run a LOT of servers and servers are >> very serious work. >> >> John > > Serious Work is a defined term. See the original post. By definition > servers are not Serious Work, though they may be doing serious and > important work. > > RL So you finally manage to contradict yourself in your own post. -- Norman Registered Linux user #461062 AMD64X2 6400+ Ubuntu 8.04 64bit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 23:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <df4lc8-i7d.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #33024 |
In reply to Norman Peelman who posted: > RayLopez99 wrote: >> On Jun 14, 7:20 am, John Slade <hhitma...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> On 6/10/2011 3:07 PM, RayLopez99 wrote: >>> >>>> Again, I ask the timeless rhetorical question: who is seriously using >>>> Linux for Serious Work? Since the first time I've posted this thread, >>>> from years ago, only ONE (1) person has shown me they do Serious Work >>>> (a defined term--for you first time viewers--I'm talking about an OS >>>> that supports the Office Suite). This one person was a contract >>>> manager who insisted on using Linux. He was valuable enough to his >>>> organization that they let him get away with this stunt, and he ended >>>> up converting all Linux work into Office format using some emulator >>>> like Wine I suppose, or perhaps Linux somehow can export to .docx >>>> format, though I don't see how. >>>> One person in all these years. Just one. >>>> Case closed. >>> Linux is used to run a LOT of servers and servers are >>> very serious work. >>> >>> John >> >> Serious Work is a defined term. See the original post. By definition >> servers are not Serious Work, though they may be doing serious and >> important work. >> >> RL > > So you finally manage to contradict yourself in your own post. "Man, enough rope, hanging" comes to mind. -- Never violate the Prime Directory! \ "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 23:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnivfra2.537.ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
| In reply to | #33026 |
On 2011-06-14, William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> wrote: > In reply to Norman Peelman who posted: > >> RayLopez99 wrote: >>> On Jun 14, 7:20 am, John Slade <hhitma...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>>> On 6/10/2011 3:07 PM, RayLopez99 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Again, I ask the timeless rhetorical question: who is seriously using >>>>> Linux for Serious Work? Since the first time I've posted this thread, >>>>> from years ago, only ONE (1) person has shown me they do Serious Work >>>>> (a defined term--for you first time viewers--I'm talking about an OS >>>>> that supports the Office Suite). This one person was a contract >>>>> manager who insisted on using Linux. He was valuable enough to his >>>>> organization that they let him get away with this stunt, and he ended >>>>> up converting all Linux work into Office format using some emulator >>>>> like Wine I suppose, or perhaps Linux somehow can export to .docx >>>>> format, though I don't see how. >>>>> One person in all these years. Just one. >>>>> Case closed. >>>> Linux is used to run a LOT of servers and servers are >>>> very serious work. >>>> >>>> John >>> >>> Serious Work is a defined term. See the original post. By definition >>> servers are not Serious Work, though they may be doing serious and >>> important work. >>> >>> RL >> >> So you finally manage to contradict yourself in your own post. > > "Man, enough rope, hanging" comes to mind. > Lopez didn't contradict itself. Did you notice the capital 'S' in "Serious"? It means the opposite to what you think it means... "S" as in "Secretarial"... Lopez considers secretarial work to be the only "Serious" work. I hope all new posters now understand and will ignore the troll in future. Lopez does this every couple of months. -- Regards, Gregory. Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 08:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <it9mhf$49q$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32817 |
RayLopez99 wrote: > On Jun 14, 7:20 am, John Slade <hhitma...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On 6/10/2011 3:07 PM, RayLopez99 wrote: >> >>> Again, I ask the timeless rhetorical question: who is seriously using >>> Linux for Serious Work? Since the first time I've posted this thread, >>> from years ago, only ONE (1) person has shown me they do Serious Work >>> (a defined term--for you first time viewers--I'm talking about an OS >>> that supports the Office Suite). This one person was a contract >>> manager who insisted on using Linux. He was valuable enough to his >>> organization that they let him get away with this stunt, and he ended >>> up converting all Linux work into Office format using some emulator >>> like Wine I suppose, or perhaps Linux somehow can export to .docx >>> format, though I don't see how. >>> One person in all these years. Just one. >>> Case closed. >> Linux is used to run a LOT of servers and servers are >> very serious work. >> >> John > > Serious Work is a defined term. See the original post. By definition > servers are not Serious Work, though they may be doing serious and > important work. > > RL You have it wrong. Serious work is any work that is not done on Microsoft equipped hardware. So Duke Nukem and Xbox is not serious work. Neither is reinstalling Vista serious work, or faking sales projections on Excel and power point.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web