Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32407 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 170 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
[Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending. "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:20 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:42 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 16:18 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 13:07 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 19:23 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 20:17 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:41 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 12:47 -0700
Re: Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:53 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:50 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:51 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:50 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 19:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-13 15:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:39 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:04 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:24 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:42 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500
Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200
[Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400
Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 13:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 20:43 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 03:31 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-14 21:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-06-15 05:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-15 07:31 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:34 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 09:45 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 10:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 11:15 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:23 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:19 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:34 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:53 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:14 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 12:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 17:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 11:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:37 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 00:04 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 18:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 00:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:32 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 09:07 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 11:21 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-16 17:54 +0200
[Troll] A dope with a rope Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 12:55 -0400
Re: [Chris Ahlstrom] A pussy with no balls "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 13:09 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-16 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 18:20 +0100
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-16 12:40 -0500
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 14:02 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 19:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 14:30 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 07:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 01:33 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-17 11:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-16 15:43 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-17 09:35 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:36 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 16:47 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 12:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:15 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-18 10:21 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 13:10 +0200
Time for some scripting! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-18 06:59 -0400
Re: Time for some scripting! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-18 10:40 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> - 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500
Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110614091734.481@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32793 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Gregory Shearman: > On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what >> ever reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with >> mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his >> head. > > Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually > creating and initializing your filesystems? Come on, just buy one os those many laptops that come with Gentoo pre-loaded. They're all over the place ;-) I always do create my partitions/filesystems from the command line. By far the fastest tool to get the job done. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. ~ Albert Einstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it7q69$sh1$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32793 |
On 14-06-11 08:50, Gregory Shearman wrote: > On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin<ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x >> and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever >> reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and >> mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. >> > > Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating > and initializing your filesystems? Ask our self assumed "expert on everything" "Hadron". He "ridiculed" me for mentioning my "mk2fs and mkswap/swapon idiocy". -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110615010616.751@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32844 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: > On 14-06-11 08:50, Gregory Shearman wrote: >> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin<ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked >>>> dirty. >>> >>> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >>> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for >>> what ever reason) manually create and initialize their file >>> systems with mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies >>> right over his head. >>> >> >> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually >> creating and initializing your filesystems? > > Ask our self assumed "expert on everything" "Hadron". He "ridiculed" > me for mentioning my "mk2fs and mkswap/swapon idiocy". Ha, that I do remember. I still wonder what his problem was with you using the canonical tools to get the job done... True Linux Advocate Hadron telling us that using mk2fs and swapon/off is 'idiocy'. What a joke. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be Stupid men are often capable of things the clever would not dare to contemplate... ~ Terry Pratchett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it94b6$imc$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #33029 |
On 15-06-11 01:13, TomB wrote: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: >> On 14-06-11 08:50, Gregory Shearman wrote: >>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin<ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>>>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>>>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked >>>>> dirty. >>>> >>>> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >>>> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for >>>> what ever reason) manually create and initialize their file >>>> systems with mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies >>>> right over his head. >>>> >>> >>> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually >>> creating and initializing your filesystems? >> >> Ask our self assumed "expert on everything" "Hadron". He "ridiculed" >> me for mentioning my "mk2fs and mkswap/swapon idiocy". > > Ha, that I do remember. I still wonder what his problem was with you > using the canonical tools to get the job done... True Linux Advocate > Hadron telling us that using mk2fs and swapon/off is 'idiocy'. What a > joke. Actually I used a Slackware 8.1 install CD to work around the hopelessly flawed Puppy Linux install script at that time (it was quite an early version of Puppy B.T.W.). The Slackware installation CD provides the option to open a shell and use the GNU-tools for whatever purpose. Maybe it was a weird solution yet it did the job for me as expected. I might be wrong, yet I have the idea that "Hadron" totally freaks out when people think for them selves and are not afraid of using CLI-based tools, instead of pushing a series of shiny buttons. I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <hiamc8-7v8.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #33040 |
In reply to Marti Van Lin who posted: > On 15-06-11 01:13, TomB wrote: > >> On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: >>> On 14-06-11 08:50, Gregory Shearman wrote: >>>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin<ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>>>>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>>>>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked >>>>>> dirty. >>>>> >>>>> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >>>>> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for >>>>> what ever reason) manually create and initialize their file >>>>> systems with mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies >>>>> right over his head. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually >>>> creating and initializing your filesystems? >>> >>> Ask our self assumed "expert on everything" "Hadron". He "ridiculed" >>> me for mentioning my "mk2fs and mkswap/swapon idiocy". >> >> Ha, that I do remember. I still wonder what his problem was with you >> using the canonical tools to get the job done... True Linux Advocate >> Hadron telling us that using mk2fs and swapon/off is 'idiocy'. What a >> joke. > > Actually I used a Slackware 8.1 install CD to work around the hopelessly > flawed Puppy Linux install script at that time (it was quite an early > version of Puppy B.T.W.). > > The Slackware installation CD provides the option to open a shell and > use the GNU-tools for whatever purpose. > > Maybe it was a weird solution yet it did the job for me as expected. It did the job for you, & that's fine. Whether it was a conventional way of doing it doesn't really matter. It *worked* for you. This is one thing the idiotic wintrolls, like the Hadron M$ fanboi, can't understand. > I might be wrong, yet I have the idea that "Hadron" totally freaks out > when people think for them selves and are not afraid of using CLI-based > tools, instead of pushing a series of shiny buttons. Yeah, well he's a Wintroll, what did you expect! > I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... Nope, he certainly isn't. -- Never violate the Prime Directory! \ "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qu9hv69j65eiiqtecoevs8eaq6lnn2tfkn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #33040 |
Marti Van Lin wrote: >I might be wrong, yet I have the idea that "Hadron" totally freaks out >when people think for them selves and are not afraid of using CLI-based >tools, instead of pushing a series of shiny buttons. > >I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... He's a fscking lightweight, for sure. (and a fscking idiot) -- "Far easier than talking them through a GUI? WTF???????????????????????????" - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark, apparently unable to comprehend that, in some cases, a CLI *is* easier or more efficient than a GUI.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itabmh$gq5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33080 |
dog shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:qu9hv69j65eiiqtecoevs8eaq6lnn2tfkn@4ax.com... > Marti Van Lin wrote: > >> >>I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... > > He's a fscking lightweight, for sure. (and a fscking idiot) > talk about a fscking lightweight. a useless turd like "chrisv" has yet to even try and say anything technical. you sure do not mind making a total jackass out of yourself over, and over, and over again. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a useless piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <6rzkljust8.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #33080 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> writes: > Marti Van Lin wrote: > >>I might be wrong, yet I have the idea that "Hadron" totally freaks out >>when people think for them selves and are not afraid of using CLI-based >>tools, instead of pushing a series of shiny buttons. You have the idea. Yet you are wrong. I do use the CLI and basic tools all the time - indeed my editor and email system are all emacs based and heavily self customised in elisp. Surely you recall me rewriting Telnet Porters (copyrighted) page of bash script with a single line? Are you ever right about anything? What *I* like to use and customise doesnt alter my views about the average desktop user. face it Marti. You were wrong again. And a right chump you looked too "me tooing" the morons. If you were to take your head out of Roy's arse and stop making things up you might actually advocate as opposed to "advocate". >> >>I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... I know a shit lot more than you Marti and you know it. > > He's a fscking lightweight, for sure. (and a fscking idiot) More fine "advocacy" from windows using, closed source SW proponent "the Turd".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pC2Kp.119411$8m.109203@news.usenetserver.com> |
| In reply to | #33085 |
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:07 +0200, Hadron wrote: > Surely you recall me rewriting Telnet Porters (copyrighted) page of > bash script with a single line? Surely you recall me pointing out the bug in your one-liner and my posting a solution that worked? Are you ever right about anything? (rhetorical)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <buhhv653vk7phg1e403btcdt70p94pusou@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #33087 |
Hardon wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> Surely you recall me rewriting Telnet Porters (copyrighted) page of >> bash script with a single line? > >Surely you recall me pointing out the bug in your one-liner and my >posting a solution that worked? > >Are you ever right about anything? (rhetorical) 8) Poor Larry. -- "From the general tone in COLA where the attitude seems to be that all software must be free and anyone charging money for it is an evil crook." - Larry "message ID" Qualig
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <bh6nc8-drh.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #33087 |
In reply to Hardon who posted: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:07 +0200, Hadron wrote: > >> Surely you recall me rewriting Telnet Porters (copyrighted) page of >> bash script with a single line? > > Surely you recall me pointing out the bug in your one-liner and my > posting a solution that worked? So, the Hadron troll screwed something up again. Why are we not surprised. > Are you ever right about anything? (rhetorical) -- Hadron's song: Troll, troll, troll your FUD, Merrily through the groups, Troll, troll, troll, troll, See who I can dupe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itah2u$4vr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #33040 |
On 6/14/2011 10:10 PM, Marti Van Lin wrote: > Actually I used a Slackware 8.1 install CD to work around the hopelessly > flawed Puppy Linux install script at that time (it was quite an early > version of Puppy B.T.W.). What does version number - rather than lackadaisacal and lazy attitude - have to do with the fact they couldn't write an install script? You should go to work for Canonical, Marti. You could haunt the Ubuntu forums and make up excuses for why 35% to 40% of victims who try to install or upgrade the crapware every 6 months run into many problems they can't solve. > The Slackware installation CD provides the option to open a shell and > use the GNU-tools for whatever purpose. > > Maybe it was a weird solution yet it did the job for me as expected. > > I might be wrong, yet I have the idea that "Hadron" totally freaks out > when people think for them selves and are not afraid of using CLI-based > tools, instead of pushing a series of shiny buttons. > > I'm afraid "Hadron" is not the "expert" he claims to be... He sounds like a serious Linux nerd to me. "Desktop Linux can be and often is superb. I have Debian Squeeze with xmonad, dual monitor so can watch tv/vids etc on the second head - about as much "multimedia" as I need. Its as stable has hell. Gimp is more than adequate for any gfx work I do to support any SW contracts I fulfill (generally in terms of icons, bg gfx etc for php/xml/css/facebook based internet apps), emacs is pretty much my sole document editor including LaTex (I think Latex sucks arse as a "usable" product but when you have learnt it, the quality is excellent) with AucTex and email/nntp with Gnus. I rely heavily on ssh, emacs daemon with ssh and tmux sessions allowing me to connect from anywhere and rsync and git to keep machines aligned. I would never go back to Windows because NOW I enjoy knowing how it all works. And, the reliability IS superb." Debian Squeeze xmonad Gimp emacs LaTex AucTex Gnus ssh rsync git To me that all sounds like: gag retch hurl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <19j1hm6v4z251$.gu5356z52889$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #33103 |
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:54:16 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 6/14/2011 10:10 PM, Marti Van Lin wrote: > >> Actually I used a Slackware 8.1 install CD to work around the hopelessly >> flawed Puppy Linux install script at that time (it was quite an early >> version of Puppy B.T.W.). > > > What does version number - rather than lackadaisacal and lazy attitude - > have to do with the fact they couldn't write an install script? > > You should go to work for Canonical, Marti. You could haunt the Ubuntu > forums and make up excuses for why 35% to 40% of victims who try to > install or upgrade the crapware every 6 months run into many problems > they can't solve. sMarti would fit in quite well with that band of freaks. He could be their "hardware shill". IOW no matter what the problem is, blame it on the user's hardware. They also have a "user shill". Her job is to blame all the problems on the end user. -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Linux's dismal desktop market share: http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html Desktop Linux on Life Support: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itak6u$q16$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #33114 |
On 6/15/2011 11:17 AM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:54:16 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 6/14/2011 10:10 PM, Marti Van Lin wrote: >> >>> Actually I used a Slackware 8.1 install CD to work around the hopelessly >>> flawed Puppy Linux install script at that time (it was quite an early >>> version of Puppy B.T.W.). >> >> >> What does version number - rather than lackadaisacal and lazy attitude - >> have to do with the fact they couldn't write an install script? >> >> You should go to work for Canonical, Marti. You could haunt the Ubuntu >> forums and make up excuses for why 35% to 40% of victims who try to >> install or upgrade the crapware every 6 months run into many problems >> they can't solve. > > sMarti would fit in quite well with that band of freaks. > > He could be their "hardware shill". > > IOW no matter what the problem is, blame it on the user's hardware. > > They also have a "user shill". > > Her job is to blame all the problems on the end user. hahahaha!!! Excusing slopware issues is a very specialized task...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110614090842.294@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32735 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: > On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >> Poaster: >>> In reply to TomB who posted: >>>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>>> Poaster: >>>>> >>>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get >>>>> it! >>>> >>>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>>> >>> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >>> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >>> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >>> over again. >> >> Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the >> subject :-) > > I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in > Google Groups: > > http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x Thanks. Funny little thread there. Hadron claiming extensive knowledge on /etc/fstab, yet having no clue what that one line did. And while not spot on, your educated guess was good. Let me guess: when Hadron claims he 'schooled' you on the subject of fstab, this is the thread he's referring to? Kind of an hairy solution though, fixing permission on device nodes through /etc/fstab. The better solution would've been to add your user to whatever group needed to gain read/write on the relevant device node (the video group in this case I think). > (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) Eh? Of course not. Why would it? >>>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>>> fstab. >>> >>> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >>> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to >>> complete don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >>> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> >> >> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > > "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their > 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what > ever reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with > mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his > head. He's quite the character, our Hadron. So he doesn't like people using the tools at hand for doing a particular job? What a nutcase. He will say /anything/ to insult an 'advocate'. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be Thats galloping insanity for you if you ask me. ~ 7
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <adnjc8-j2d.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32798 |
In reply to TomB who posted: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>> Poaster: >>>> In reply to TomB who posted: >>>>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>>>> Poaster: >>>>>> >>>>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get >>>>>> it! >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>>>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>>>> >>>> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >>>> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >>>> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >>>> over again. >>> >>> Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the >>> subject :-) >> >> I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in >> Google Groups: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x > > Thanks. Funny little thread there. Hadron claiming extensive knowledge > on /etc/fstab, yet having no clue what that one line did. And while > not spot on, your educated guess was good. Let me guess: when Hadron > claims he 'schooled' you on the subject of fstab, this is the thread > he's referring to? I believe it is. > Kind of an hairy solution though, fixing permission on device nodes > through /etc/fstab. The better solution would've been to add your user > to whatever group needed to gain read/write on the relevant device > node (the video group in this case I think). > >> (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) > > Eh? Of course not. Why would it? > >>>>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>>>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>>>> fstab. >>>> >>>> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >>>> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to >>>> complete don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >>>> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what >> ever reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with >> mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his >> head. > > He's quite the character, our Hadron. So he doesn't like people using > the tools at hand for doing a particular job? What a nutcase. He will > say /anything/ to insult an 'advocate'. Naturally, because *he* can't do it, he's jealous of those that can. And you're right, he's a real nutcase, an "ill-mannered, ill-educated, arrogant and shamelessly lying character" as someone described him in another group. -- "!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW" "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it80ca$bcc$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32798 |
On 14-06-11 09:17, TomB wrote: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>> Poaster: >>>> In reply to TomB who posted: >>>>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>>>> Poaster: >>>>>> >>>>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get >>>>>> it! >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>>>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>>>> >>>> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >>>> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >>>> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >>>> over again. >>> >>> Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the >>> subject :-) >> >> I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in >> Google Groups: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x > > Thanks. Funny little thread there. Hadron claiming extensive knowledge > on /etc/fstab, yet having no clue what that one line did. And while > not spot on, your educated guess was good. Let me guess: when Hadron > claims he 'schooled' you on the subject of fstab, this is the thread > he's referring to? *Bingo* ;-) > Kind of an hairy solution though, fixing permission on device nodes > through /etc/fstab. The better solution would've been to add your user > to whatever group needed to gain read/write on the relevant device > node (the video group in this case I think). Indeed, I made myself member of the video group, yet unfortunately it didn't solve the problem. This weird "hack" in /etc/fstab was solved it. In the next version of Ubuntu, the shitty webcam however worked out of the box. >> (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) > > Eh? Of course not. Why would it? Thanks, in that case I have to investigate my ~.slrn config file and search for the word wrap settings (I guess). Frequently I have to scroll horizontally through messages in slrn. My bad. >>>>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>>>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>>>> fstab. >>>> >>>> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >>>> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to >>>> complete don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >>>> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls >>> the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and >>> will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their >> 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what >> ever reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with >> mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his >> head. > > He's quite the character, our Hadron. So he doesn't like people using > the tools at hand for doing a particular job? What a nutcase. He will > say /anything/ to insult an 'advocate'. He doesn't like the people using the tools at hand, because it flies right over his head. -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110614192242.107@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32886 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Marti Van Lin: > On 14-06-11 09:17, TomB wrote: > >> Thanks. Funny little thread there. Hadron claiming extensive >> knowledge on /etc/fstab, yet having no clue what that one line did. >> And while not spot on, your educated guess was good. Let me guess: >> when Hadron claims he 'schooled' you on the subject of fstab, this >> is the thread he's referring to? > > *Bingo* ;-) Rolf, quite the 'schooling' you got there. "I don't know what it does, hence you do not know either." Brilliant. >>> (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) >> >> Eh? Of course not. Why would it? > > Thanks, in that case I have to investigate my ~.slrn config file and > search for the word wrap settings (I guess). Frequently I have to > scroll horizontally through messages in slrn. My bad. Hehe, I consider that to be The Right Thing™ ;-) (wrapping URLs sucks) -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel. ~ Homer J. Simpson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ismjc8-91c.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32735 |
In reply to Marti Van Lin who posted: > On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: > >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >> Poaster: >>> In reply to TomB who posted: >>>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>>> Poaster: >>>>> >>>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! >>>> >>>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>>> >>> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >>> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >>> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >>> over again. >> >> Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the subject >> :-) > > I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in > Google Groups: > > http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x > > (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) > >>>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>>> fstab. >>> >>> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >>> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete >>> don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >>> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> >> >> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > > "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x > and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever > reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and > mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. Well the "true linux advocate" & "kernel hacker" (snicker) hasn't got the faintest clue. As has been said by a few posters (in other groups too) he's not a bright or clever as *he* thinks he is. -- A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it850p$n0t$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32809 |
On 14-06-11 11:40, William Poaster wrote: > In reply to Marti Van Lin who posted: > >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >> >>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>> Poaster: >>>> In reply to TomB who posted: >>>>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>>>> Poaster: >>>>>> >>>>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! >>>>> >>>>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>>>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>>>> >>>> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >>>> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >>>> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >>>> over again. >>> >>> Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the subject >>> :-) >> >> I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in >> Google Groups: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x >> >> (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) >> >>>>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>>>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>>>> fstab. >>>> >>>> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >>>> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete >>>> don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >>>> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x >> and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever >> reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and >> mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. > > Well the "true linux advocate"& "kernel hacker" (snicker) hasn't got the > faintest clue. As has been said by a few posters (in other groups too) he's > not a bright or clever as *he* thinks he is. Oh well, *every real GNU/Linux* user on usenet noticed by now that "Hadron" is nothing but a sneering troll and a incompetent clown who attacks his superiors shamelessly. Don't worry and be happy, let "Hadron" rot in his bin bucket ;-) -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web