Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268269 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-11-20 14:12 +0100 |
| Last post | 2014-11-24 12:11 -0700 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 169 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-11-20 14:12 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-20 08:20 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-11-20 15:39 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-20 12:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-11-25 17:23 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 11:40 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:47 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-20 14:36 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-11-20 15:45 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-20 16:30 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-20 09:01 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-20 08:09 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-20 19:30 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2014-11-25 17:45 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 11:06 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 13:11 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 12:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-11-21 23:45 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 01:10 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-11-22 01:51 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 21:09 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-21 19:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-21 21:49 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 03:55 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-22 06:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-22 23:12 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-22 19:44 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-23 10:22 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 20:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 02:22 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 20:41 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 03:23 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 21:37 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 03:49 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 22:39 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-21 20:52 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-21 23:59 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-22 09:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 09:25 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 09:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 12:03 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 04:53 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 00:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-22 06:50 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 08:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-22 13:36 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-22 07:20 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 08:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-22 08:53 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 10:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 10:16 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 12:16 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 12:19 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 15:00 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-23 12:39 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-22 13:33 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 08:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 09:03 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 09:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-22 06:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 08:29 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-22 13:20 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-22 08:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-23 12:51 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-24 05:57 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 19:56 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 17:55 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 16:01 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:14 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 18:57 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-25 10:12 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 19:17 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 11:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 13:36 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 11:54 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-25 12:29 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 13:38 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-25 13:20 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 10:56 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-26 12:51 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 14:13 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-26 14:23 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:12 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-25 13:29 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-25 11:54 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:08 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 15:12 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:32 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 21:47 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 14:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 14:30 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 13:37 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 11:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:56 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:21 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 22:04 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 14:01 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-26 15:01 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 16:33 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-26 17:44 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 17:04 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 13:33 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 23:59 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 16:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 00:29 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 17:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-25 18:33 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 19:49 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 19:51 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 18:48 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 11:32 +0100
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 09:35 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:26 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-26 13:29 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:58 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:23 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 11:24 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 11:13 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 22:43 +0000
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 17:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:21 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-26 10:50 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 11:00 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 12:06 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 10:59 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 14:05 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 11:45 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-26 12:53 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 14:07 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-26 15:39 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:12 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:11 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 14:00 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:16 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 11:50 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 10:44 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 19:46 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 13:33 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:02 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:23 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:32 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:14 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-24 08:02 -0600
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-24 09:31 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 11:02 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 11:00 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-24 14:54 -0500
Visual Studio 2013. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2014-11-25 21:15 -0800
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:55 -0500
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:27 -0700
Re: Microsoft Windows 10 gets Packagemanager named "OneGet". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:11 -0700
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D508.41AB7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268635 |
On 11/24/14, 9:02 AM, in article m4vkpu$c4b$1@dont-email.me, "Sir Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 24/11/2014 9:31 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> Threat? Windows is not a threat to Linux. Microsoft has been unable to >>>> kill Linux all these years; they've only been able to surpress it in the >>>> "desktop market". >>> >>> I think the "threat" is that desktop Windows could, eventually, become >>> as good as desktop Linux. But, even if it does, desktop Linux will >>> still be a better choice, for many. As I've said a thousand times, >>> there's no way that one product can be the "best choice" for 90% of >>> such a diverse market, no matter how "good" it is. >> >> If Windows becomes identical to Linux, then Linux "wins". > > If Windows uses _some_ of the features of GNU/Linux, it simply means > that those features were useful. The idea of a repository - clearly > something which originated with GNU/Linux - provides security and > confidence in what you download. Well, except on Android. :) > It's definitely a good idea. It is - and I am happy to see OS X use something similar. I have no problem with MS using something like it, either. > However, Microsoft can't be scolded for wanting to use it because, whether we > like it or not, everything you find inside in the open-source ecosystem is up > for grabs. Its ideas and software are not patented or copyrighted so other > than get a small number of complaints from a fanatical bunch of losers, > Microsoft gets away with implementing them. Right: the open source community goes out of its way to make sure the ideas they offer are open - free to be used. It makes no sense to complain when people then use these ideas. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 11:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <54738052$0$39591$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #268632 |
On 11/24/2014 06:31 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Heh, that's funny. Visual Studio 2013 displays source-code filenames in all > lower-case in the Output window now. Annoying as hell when using a bash > shell to work with the code (outside of the IDE). > > Q: Why not just output the filename as is? > A: UNIX envy Your answer describes a lot of the "innovation" found in Windows moving forward -- if it doesn't fit into that category, it's usually absolute crap. (cf., Tiles interface) (BTW, would Eclipse or QTCreator work instead of VS for your projects?) -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D531.41AB9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268675 |
On 11/24/14, 12:00 PM, in article 54738052$0$39591$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On 11/24/2014 06:31 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Heh, that's funny. Visual Studio 2013 displays source-code filenames in all >> lower-case in the Output window now. Annoying as hell when using a bash >> shell to work with the code (outside of the IDE). >> >> Q: Why not just output the filename as is? >> A: UNIX envy > > Your answer describes a lot of the "innovation" found in Windows moving > forward -- if it doesn't fit into that category, it's usually absolute > crap. (cf., Tiles interface) > > (BTW, would Eclipse or QTCreator work instead of VS for your projects?) Yeah, too bad MS cannot show the quality I show Linux having in the videos in my .sig. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 14:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m502dr$fq6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268675 |
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 11/24/2014 06:31 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Heh, that's funny. Visual Studio 2013 displays source-code filenames in all >> lower-case in the Output window now. Annoying as hell when using a bash >> shell to work with the code (outside of the IDE). >> >> Q: Why not just output the filename as is? >> A: UNIX envy > > Your answer describes a lot of the "innovation" found in Windows moving > forward -- if it doesn't fit into that category, it's usually absolute > crap. (cf., Tiles interface) > > (BTW, would Eclipse or QTCreator work instead of VS for your projects?) Actually, the *command line* build works for most of the C++ code and all of the Java code. But VS is still the team tool for the C++ side, for better or worse. I've used Qt Creator quite a bit, just starting to try out Eclipse. NetBeans is pretty nice, too. -- You have a strong desire for a home and your family interests come first.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 21:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Visual Studio 2013. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.25{9.15P.Seattle.2014}> |
| In reply to | #268675 |
<PRE><big><big> I Use Visual Studio 2013 all day, every day, SERIOUSLY. Every waking moment, almost. I started using MicroSoft's IDE back in 1988, over 26 years ago, and I've been using it HEAVY, HEAVY, ever since. Visual Studio has lots of "Output" windows, so I don't know which one Chris Ahlstrom is talking about, if any. When doing the "Compile/Link/Run" thing ( C++ ), the "Output window" is "mostly"[*] true to my camel·case file names; ＜<A hRef='http://Jeff-Relf.Me/VS_Output.PNG' target=_blank>Screenshot</A>＞. [ *: once, it says "X.exe", not "X.EXE" ] When editing, it looks like ＜<A hRef='http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Visual-Studio-2013-Toolbars.PNG' target=_blank>Screenshot</A>＞. When running my source code, it looks like this: [ 2160 x 3840, Windows 8 ] · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Super.Fast.Monopoly.JPG" target=_blank>Fast/Mindless Monoply</A>, · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Chess.JPG" target=_blank>Fast/Mindless Chess</A>, · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.PNG" target=_blank>The Console/Keyboard</A>, · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Reversi.JPG" target=_blank>Reversi</A>, · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Solitair.JPG" target=_blank>Solitair</A>, · <A hRef="http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Mario.JPG" target=_blank>Mario</A>. // // // // ＜<A hRef='http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.CPP' target=_blank>X.CPP, Visual C++ 2013, x64</A>＞ produces, ＜<A hRef='http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.EXE' target=_blank>X.EXE</A>＞, my Windows 8 "Start Button", "terminal/console", newsReader, email·client, web/image downloader/viewer, backup/diff utility, "Chess, Uki, Mario, Solitair, Monopoly" games, etc. The "help/settings file" is ＜<A hRef='http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM' target=_blank>Here</A>＞. "MS Mincho", with "DejaVu LGC Sans Mono" and "nSimSun" exceptions, are the "Unicode Console" fonts -- required. If they don't exist, warnings are issued using "Consolas" ( Vista ).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D489.41AB4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268632 |
On 11/24/14, 7:31 AM, in article m4vff8$j5t$1@dont-email.me, "Chris Ahlstrom" <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Threat? Windows is not a threat to Linux. Microsoft has been unable to >>> kill Linux all these years; they've only been able to surpress it in the >>> "desktop market". >> >> I think the "threat" is that desktop Windows could, eventually, become >> as good as desktop Linux. But, even if it does, desktop Linux will >> still be a better choice, for many. As I've said a thousand times, >> there's no way that one product can be the "best choice" for 90% of >> such a diverse market, no matter how "good" it is. > > If Windows becomes identical to Linux, then Linux "wins". But that will never happen. Ever. As low quality as MS products can be, they will never sink to the level desktop Linux is. If you disagree then show videos of Windows acting as poorly as Linux does - compare it to the videos I show in my .sig. Neither Apple nor MS would ever allow such nonsense to fly. As far as MS (and Apple) using ideas from the open source world - why not? It is *OPEN*. The idea is for others to use it. If you do not want others to use your ideas then protect your ideas! The idea of making sure your work can freely be used by others and then getting upset when others use it is just silly. >>> Windows 10 is just more of the same. And, frankly, >>> consumers could barely tolerate Tiles. These new features, if they don't >>> annoy the hell out of consumers, will be ignored by most of them. >> >> Businesses would be wise to train their people on the advantages of >> virtual displays, when they become available on WinDOS. > > Training! Are you crazy!? That costs beaucoup bux, man! They can be trained how to use virtual desktops... but that will not make the feature *be* more useful than it is. For most people, at least as it is generally used, it is *not* very useful. Apple has a twist on it with full screen apps that are in their own space, and while this might have value in some use cases even it is not really something most users really use that often (though it is used more than other forms of virtual desktops). >> -- >> "Linux crapware can't handle case-sensitivity correctly: forces some >> of victim's NTFS folders to lower case" - DumFSck > > Heh, that's funny. Funny and true. Linux screws things up for the native OS of the file system. It should at least have an easy to use option where this does not happen (and, really, that should be the default). > Visual Studio 2013 displays source-code filenames in all > lower-case in the Output window now. Annoying as hell when using a bash > shell to work with the code (outside of the IDE). > > Q: Why not just output the filename as is? > A: UNIX envy It should show the file name as it is. No argument here. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m4vkce$9bf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #268628 |
On 24/11/2014 9:02 AM, chrisv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> Threat? Windows is not a threat to Linux. Microsoft has been unable to >> kill Linux all these years; they've only been able to surpress it in the >> "desktop market". > > I think the "threat" is that desktop Windows could, eventually, become > as good as desktop Linux. But, even if it does, desktop Linux will > still be a better choice, for many. As I've said a thousand times, > there's no way that one product can be the "best choice" for 90% of > such a diverse market, no matter how "good" it is. Windows doesn't need to be good, it needs to be good enough. Windows 7, 8 and 10 are already good enough: they provide stability, performance and require little or nothing in terms of hardware. In the case of GNU/Linux, it's nice that it runs on older and worse hardware than Windows but it doesn't provide the most important thing: stability. Until that becomes a primordial concern to GNU/Linux developers, we won't be seeing its adoption rate beat 2%. -- Sir Slimer OpenMedia Supporter www.silverlips.ca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D4AB.41AB6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268633 |
On 11/24/14, 8:55 AM, in article m4vkce$9bf$1@dont-email.me, "Sir Slimer" <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > On 24/11/2014 9:02 AM, chrisv wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> Threat? Windows is not a threat to Linux. Microsoft has been unable to >>> kill Linux all these years; they've only been able to surpress it in the >>> "desktop market". >> >> I think the "threat" is that desktop Windows could, eventually, become >> as good as desktop Linux. But, even if it does, desktop Linux will >> still be a better choice, for many. As I've said a thousand times, >> there's no way that one product can be the "best choice" for 90% of >> such a diverse market, no matter how "good" it is. > > Windows doesn't need to be good, it needs to be good enough. Windows 7, > 8 and 10 are already good enough: they provide stability, performance > and require little or nothing in terms of hardware. In the case of > GNU/Linux, it's nice that it runs on older and worse hardware than > Windows but it doesn't provide the most important thing: stability. > Until that becomes a primordial concern to GNU/Linux developers, we > won't be seeing its adoption rate beat 2%. Ahlstrom thinks MS is concerned about catching up to what is shown in the videos, below. Insanity. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-24 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D098D0EB.41AAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #268617 |
On 11/24/14, 3:57 AM, in article m4v2ts$3j3$1@dont-email.me, "Chris Ahlstrom" <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > Nobody wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Marti van Lin wrote: >>> >>> http://www.howtogeek.com/200334/windows-10-includes-a-linux-style-package-ma >>> nager-named-oneget/ >>> >>> This, combined with native Virtual Desktop support makes Microsoft >>> Windows a huge treat to Desktop Linux IMO. >> >> I assume you meant to type "threat," rather than "treat." Yes, M$ has a >> long history of copying other people's ideas, then using their monopoply >> power to put their competitors out of business with their very own work. >> They finally got around to copying package managers and virtual >> desktops. More Embrace, extend, extinguish. > > Threat? Windows is not a threat to Linux. Microsoft has been unable to > kill Linux all these years; they've only been able to surpress it in the > "desktop market". Given how Linux is open source and even if nobody added any development to it ever again it would still be available, what does it even mean to "kill" it? That is just word salad from you. As far as suppressing it on the desktop, the quality (or lack of it) is what has "suppressed" it. If and when there is a viable alternative from the open source ecosystem then MS and Apple will be in trouble. Neither can stop it from being used no matter what they do. You cannot stop a free system which is easy to get from spreading *if* people want it (and it needs to be competitive for this to happen). Right now Linux is simply not competitive on the desktop. Stop blaming the boogieman. > Windows 10 is just more of the same. And, frankly, consumers could barely > tolerate Tiles. These new features, if they don't annoy the hell out of > consumers, will be ignored by most of them. Virtual desktops will likely be ignored by most people. Sure. It is not a feature that most people need or want or would benefit them in any way. With that said, it is good to have for the few people who do like it and use it. -- * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web