Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173055 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-04-20 14:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 185 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
Usenet is NOT "pure text". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
Usenet is a form of email. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
[NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. "Pieter Zijlstra" <p.zylstra.notthis@hccnet.nl> - 2013-04-20 01:28 +0200
Were you a Windows Live Mail user, Pieter Zijlstra, I'd post HTML. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 18:01 -0700
Re: Were you a Windows Live Mail user, Pieter Zijlstra, I'd post HTML. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 18:04 -0700
<A> tags are VERY useful; e.g. you see/use them everyday, everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 18:52 -0700
Re: <A> tags are VERY useful; e.g. you see/use them everyday, everywhere. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 18:56 -0700
Re: <A> tags are VERY useful; e.g. you see/use them everyday, everywhere. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 22:01 -0400
Re: <A> tags are VERY useful; e.g. you see/use them everyday, everywhere. ?? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 19:05 -0700
Re: <A> tags are VERY useful; e.g. you see/use them everyday, everywhere. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 22:11 -0400
I'm not here for RHONDA. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 19:21 -0700
Re: I'm not here for RHONDA. iL_WeReo <caljamscott@gmail.com> - 2013-04-20 00:29 -0700
I've been posting plain⋅text, not HTML. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 19:15 -0700
Re: I've been posting plain???text, not HTML. ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-20 02:18 +0000
Re: I've been posting plain⋅text, not HTML. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 19:24 -0700
Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 19:28 -0700
Re: Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. ?»??»? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. ?»??»? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 19:44 -0700
Re: Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. ?»??»? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 22:48 -0400
Re: Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 19:43 -0700
Mr. "%" is ain't too literate, I take it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-19 21:15 -0700
Re: Mr. "%" is ain't too literate, I take it. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 21:20 -0700
Re: Getting "killfiled" means NOTHING to me. benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-20 03:36 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-22 07:30 -0500
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-22 18:07 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 11:13 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? cipher <cipher@nadegdaisakookboi.org> - 2013-04-22 18:30 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 12:14 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-22 22:28 +0100
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-22 18:25 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-22 21:28 -0400
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-22 18:38 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "Pieter Zijlstra" <p.zylstra.notthis@hccnet.nl> - 2013-04-27 01:28 +0200
A nymshifter would explode ChrisV's killfile. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-26 18:59 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Del McKenzie <foad@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-19 21:24 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 23:36 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-19 23:39 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Del McKenzie <foad@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-23 18:49 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 17:58 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-20 19:29 +0200
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Del McKenzie <foad@invalid.invalid> - 2013-04-20 19:28 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-22 07:31 -0500
Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". iL_WeReo <caljamscott@gmail.com> - 2013-04-20 00:30 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-20 10:57 +0100
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". iL_WeReo <caljamscott@gmail.com> - 2013-04-20 00:31 -0700
I know almost nothing about Mr. "%". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-20 01:58 -0700
Re: I know almost nothing about Mr. "%". "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-20 21:07 +0200
To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-20 12:54 -0700
Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-20 16:09 -0400
Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-20 22:18 +0200
Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2013-04-20 22:14 +0200
"Content-Type: text/HTML" is superior to "multipart/alternative". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-20 14:09 -0700
Re: "Content-Type: text/HTML" is superior to "multipart/alternative". ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-20 17:19 -0400
Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-20 14:52 -0700
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 22:18 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. |
| Message-ID | <5172f7fc$0$11999$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org> |
| In reply to | #174357 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
" Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> schreef in bericht news:6gri6n.efe.17.1@news.alt.net...
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote in message news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.20{12.54.Seattle.2013}...
> "Windows [Vista] Mail" won't let you ( Cola⋅Zealot )
> make a "Content-Type: text/HTML" post;
> instead, it shows up as "multipart/alternative".
WRONG Jeff! I can and do post "Content-Type: text/HTML" using
Vista and Windows Mail.
It's just easier to use the default "multipart/alternative."
IAWTP
--
Sir Gregory
--
Sir Gregory
--
Major Linux Problems on the Desktop
or Why Linux is not (yet) Ready for the Desktop,
2013 edition
http://bit.ly/gBOiz6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 22:14 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. |
| Message-ID | <5172f6eb$0$11998$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org> |
| In reply to | #174354 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> schreef in bericht news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.20{12.54.Seattle.2013}...
"Windows [Vista] Mail" won't let you ( Cola⋅Zealot )
make a "Content-Type: text/HTML" post;
instead, it shows up as "multipart/alternative".
At Google Groups, your post
appears as fucked⋅up plain⋅text, not HTML.Nope! it shows up nice, moron!
To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. (crapware)Nope! You're an idiot Relf!BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAH!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 14:09 -0700 |
| Subject | "Content-Type: text/HTML" is superior to "multipart/alternative". |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.20{14.09.Seattle.2013}> |
| In reply to | #174358 |
"Content-Type: text/HTML" is superior to "multipart/alternative" because, by default, Google Groups and other newsreaders revert to the MASSIVELY FUCKED UP "text/plain" version; to wit: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/518ebf278896494b http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/821a8de021aa2436 For "security" reasons, Windows [Vista] Mail won't post "Content-Type: text/HTML". [ Gregory Hall's workaround is too complicated for him, much less others ] Mozilla Thunderbird has no such restrictions/limitations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 17:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Content-Type: text/HTML" is superior to "multipart/alternative". ?? |
| Message-ID | <6grmak.8gj.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #174368 |
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote in message
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.20{14.09.Seattle.2013}...
> [ Gregory Hall's workaround is too complicated for him, much less others ]
Too complicated? All it takes is a text editor like MS Notepad. But, I suppose
hand composing mistake-free headers is beyond the capabilities of most.
I used to use a hex editor (free Cygnus) to change the code in a cracked
version of Forte Agent but that was just too tedious. Notepadding the
WinMail outbox contents is just so much easier and fun.
But, NewsMaestro Supertool is the funnest of them all. It's easy to
make templates and to automate and that takes most of the work
out of everything.
If I could only set up a rogue server like DataBasix I could totally
ruin Usenet. Bring it all crashing down...
--
Sir Gregory
--
Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-20 14:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird. |
| Message-ID | <CD985C33.19961%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #174354 |
On 4/20/13 12:54 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.20{12.54.Seattle.2013},
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
> ?
> "Windows [Vista] Mail" won't let you ( Cola・Zealot )
> make a "Content-Type: text/HTML" post;
> instead, it shows up as "multipart/alternative".
>
> At Google Groups, your post
> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/821a8de021aa2436>
> appears as fucked・up plain・text, not HTML.
>
> To post "text/HTML", you need Mozilla Thunderbird.
>
The clients that post HTML to Usenet are broken.
--
Questions about the Skype call between cc, Onion Knight, and myself:
1) Why did cc have no recollection of the "outliers" files I showed him?
2) Why did cc have no recollection of the standard deviation video?
3) Why can't cc provide the Excel file he gave his word he would share?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web