Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32407 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200 |
| Articles | 10 on this page of 170 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
[Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending. "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:20 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:42 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 16:18 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 13:07 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 19:23 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 20:17 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:41 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 12:47 -0700
Re: Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:53 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:50 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:51 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:50 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 19:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-13 15:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:39 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:04 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:24 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:42 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500
Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200
[Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400
Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 13:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 20:43 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 03:31 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-14 21:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-06-15 05:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-15 07:31 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:34 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 09:45 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 10:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 11:15 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:23 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:19 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:34 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:53 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:14 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 12:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 17:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 11:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:37 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 00:04 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 18:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 00:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:32 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 09:07 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 11:21 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-16 17:54 +0200
[Troll] A dope with a rope Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 12:55 -0400
Re: [Chris Ahlstrom] A pussy with no balls "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 13:09 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-16 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 18:20 +0100
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-16 12:40 -0500
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 14:02 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 19:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 14:30 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 07:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 01:33 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-17 11:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-16 15:43 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-17 09:35 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:36 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 16:47 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 12:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:15 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-18 10:21 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 13:10 +0200
Time for some scripting! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-18 06:59 -0400
Re: Time for some scripting! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-18 10:40 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> - 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500
Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7mmjc8-djb.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32727 |
In reply to TomB who posted: > On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William > Poaster: >> In reply to TomB who posted: >>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>> Poaster: >>>> >>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! >>> >>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>> >> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >> about fstab, & he kept asking Marti to explain it over, & over & >> over again. > > Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the subject > :-) Ok, TomB, I've found these references to it, by Mart van Lin: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e49e25b99d819671?hl=en&dmode=source Wed, 23 Dec 2009 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e49e25b99d819671?hl=en&dmode=source Sat, Feb 26 2011 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f2662b60a343e505?hl=en&dmode=source >>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>> fstab. >> >> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete >> don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> > > Yeah, that's the one. Classic. Here's the original hadron quote: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/51a8b80189610013?hl=en&dmode=source >The checks he's talking about (and which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are > controlled with the tune2fs command, not by fstab. Well *if* they trolling f#ckwit is running Linux, trust him to screw it up somehow. I've *never* had checks take hours to complete, more like a few minutes at *most*. OTOH I dunno what the effect would be if he's running a Linux distro in a VM in WinXP or Win7. > The fstab fs_passno field controls the order in which fsck checks > the filesystems at boot time, and will only trigger an actual check >if a filesystem is marked dirty. Apparently the trolling f#ckwit thinks that the interval between fs checks is an entry in fstab! -- Never violate the Prime Directory! \ "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <83mxhmos7a.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32458 |
TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes: > On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >> >> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from >> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted. > > Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the > GPL. > > Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been > deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. You really are a sad little nitpicker :- http://www.google.de/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ubuntu+termcap Do you really think that silly nitpick helps your cause? > > Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc > when a user has . on his path. Context TomB me old mate. You're doing a Creepy. > > Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and > mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even > in the repositories themselves! No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. It did mine and it did others. I even provided you links. YOU made some silly claims about them being identical. They are not. And by Debian folks I mentioned #Debian not the debian developers per se. A LOT will still deny this but the evidence is over whelming. It hasnt happened in a while and maybe the issues are totally fixed. Time will tell. > > Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on > their extension. Executed *based* on their file extensions moron. You really dont think I think adding a file extension suddenly means you can type its name at the bash cli and it magically runs do you? This type of silly pretence to get one over shows you to be a lame wanker. Obviously talking about file managers etc and file association. You really do like making a fool of yourself. I also showed how you can "execute" a file WITHOUT it being set - its as simple as "sh file.sh". Now, stop being such a dumbarse. You're embarassing yourself and clutching at straws. Only recently an article was posted which pretty much repeated what *I* told you ages ago : how to hack a Linux system when the use is a dumbarse. You dont need root to get info. The uses info is in his $HOME most of the time and NOT wrapped up a a .gpg or something similar. > > And so on. > > Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified from > you there! Serious Q : what above do you find "anti Linux"? YOu really are like your hero Creepy. Try reading and understanding for a change. You listed some off the ocuff comments that I made to correct the clueless fanbois. I stand by each and every one above. Yet you didnt list me waxing lyrical about emacs, gnus, debian, rsync, rsnapshot, ssh, gnupg, liquorix etc etc. Why is that? Oh yes. You're a dick. YOU are the one that was claiming to keep a root window open all the time, you are the one who didnt know the difference between ./configure and configure. You are the one who downloads and builds as root. You're an idiot at times. A shame. You could be so much more honest and less of a fanboi. Why not try it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110613144700.167@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32486 |
On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes: >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > >>> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts >>> from me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted. >> >> Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under >> the GPL. >> >> Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been >> deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. > > You really are a sad little nitpicker :- > > http://www.google.de/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ubuntu+termcap > > Do you really think that silly nitpick helps your cause? Whoa, a Google search result link to provide "proof". You are the man! Here, from the second hit (German translation of the termcap(5) manpage): "Die "termcap" - Datei ist eine veraltete Einrichtung zur Beschreibung der Eigenschaften / Fähigkeiten zeichenbasierter Terminals und Drucker. Sie wird nur noch aus Gründen der Kompatibilität mit alten Programmen beibehalten, neue Programme sollten terminfo(5) und die dazugehörigen Bibliotheken verwenden." Not sure why you have provide a google.de link, but I suppose this means you understand German. Please note the bits "eine veraltete Einrichtung", "nur noch aus Gründen der Kompatibilität mit alten Programmen" and "neue Programme sollten terminfo(5) (...) verwenden". >> Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc >> when a user has . on his path. > > Context TomB me old mate. You're doing a Creepy. The context was me having . at the end of $PATH. No 'rogue ls script' will do anything, unless someone managed to get the original ls program out of my $PATH. And if that were the case, I'd have bigger things to worry about. >> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, >> and mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - >> even in the repositories themselves! > > No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. > It did mine and it did others. I even provided you links. YOU made > some silly claims about them being identical. Hey, there's that lie again. I have *never* said that apt-get and aptitude are "identical". Not by /any/ stretch. Good of you to remind me that you're a liar! > They are not. Of course they are not. > And by Debian folks I mentioned #Debian not the debian developers > per se. A LOT will still deny this but the evidence is over > whelming. It hasnt happened in a while and maybe the issues are > totally fixed. Time will tell. > >> Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based >> on their extension. > > Executed *based* on their file extensions moron. *Opened with a particular program* based on their extension, moron. But feel free to think that this means the same as 'executing'. > You really dont think I think adding a file extension suddenly means > you can type its name at the bash cli and it magically runs do you? > This type of silly pretence to get one over shows you to be a lame > wanker. Obviously talking about file managers etc and file > association. You really do like making a fool of yourself. > > I also showed how you can "execute" a file WITHOUT it being set - its as > simple as "sh file.sh". Now, stop being such a dumbarse. You're > embarassing yourself and clutching at straws. Check out the special knowledge on Hadron! > Only recently an article was posted which pretty much repeated what > *I* told you ages ago : how to hack a Linux system when the use is a > dumbarse. You dont need root to get info. The uses info is in his > $HOME most of the time and NOT wrapped up a a .gpg or something > similar. > >> >> And so on. >> >> Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified >> from you there! > > Serious Q : what above do you find "anti Linux"? YOu really are like > your hero Creepy. Try reading and understanding for a change. > > You listed some off the ocuff comments that I made to correct the > clueless fanbois. I stand by each and every one above. Yet you didnt > list me waxing lyrical about emacs, gnus, debian, rsync, rsnapshot, > ssh, gnupg, liquorix etc etc. Why is that? Oh yes. You're a dick. > > YOU are the one that was claiming to keep a root window open all the > time, you are the one who didnt know the difference between > ./configure and configure. You are the one who downloads and builds > as root. You're an idiot at times. A shame. You could be so much > more honest and less of a fanboi. Why not try it. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be Much will be your power by the essence of a flower By seducement and cold rapture by abusing mother nature ~ Helloween
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o96cv61i2597ti04bec09qe6jr8levmefc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32518 |
TomB wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> TomB writes: >>> >>> Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under >>> the GPL. Note: No Quack response. >>> Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been >>> deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. >> >> You really are a sad little nitpicker :- >> >> http://www.google.de/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ubuntu+termcap >> >> Do you really think that silly nitpick helps your cause? > >Whoa, a Google search result link to provide "proof". You are the man! Really. What a fscktard, "Hadron" is. >>> Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc >>> when a user has . on his path. >> >> Context TomB me old mate. You're doing a Creepy. > >The context was me having . at the end of $PATH. No 'rogue ls >script' will do anything, unless someone managed to get the original >ls program out of my $PATH. And if that were the case, I'd have bigger >things to worry about. I still chuckle when I recall that bald-faced liar "Hadron" claiming that the Mactroll Snit, of all people, schooled you in the "dangerousness" of what you were doing. "Hadron" lies without shame! "Ezekiel" pretends not to notice. >>> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, >>> and mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - >>> even in the repositories themselves! >> >> No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. That's all you said, liar Larry. You also *lied* that "the Debian crowd" are saying that apt-get is "crap". >> It did mine and it did others. I even provided you links. YOU made >> some silly claims about them being identical. > >Hey, there's that lie again. I have *never* said that apt-get and >aptitude are "identical". Not by /any/ stretch. > >Good of you to remind me that you're a liar! "Hadron" lies like other people breath. >> (snip further Larry lies)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... |
| Message-ID | <it566h$uk5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32561 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:o96cv61i2597ti04bec09qe6jr8levmefc@4ax.com... > > Really. What a fscktard, "Hadron" is. > > > "Hadron" lies like other people breath. > more useless bullshit from the stupid fscking piece of shit asshole named "chrisv" "chrisv" is bald faced liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t57cv6lhjimcmmhv462apmihe48piee97d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32561 |
chrisv wrote: >>>> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, >>>> and mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - >>>> even in the repositories themselves! >>> >>> No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. > >That's all you said, liar Larry. You also *lied* that "the Debian >crowd" are saying that apt-get is "crap". Should say "That's _not_ all you said, liar Larry.". -- 'We are talking about you and the fellow "advocates" claiming Linux is super stable and has no bugs' - Hadron Quark, (again) lying about what advocates have claimed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... |
| Message-ID | <it580k$3vh$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32567 |
useless asshole "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:t57cv6lhjimcmmhv462apmihe48piee97d@4ax.com... > chrisv wrote: > >>>>> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, >>>>> and mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - >>>>> even in the repositories themselves! >>>> >>>> No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. >> >>That's all you said, liar Larry. You also *lied* that "the Debian >>crowd" are saying that apt-get is "crap". > > Should say "That's _not_ all you said, liar Larry.". nobody gives a flying fsck what a useless asshole like you says or should have said. fsck off and die you stupid turd. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <19s4v5e4j12zd.bxxzut24pizy$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #32486 |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:02:01 +0200, Hadron wrote: > TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >>> >>> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from >>> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted. >> >> Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the >> GPL. >> >> Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been >> deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. > > You really are a sad little nitpicker :- > > http://www.google.de/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ubuntu+termcap > > Do you really think that silly nitpick helps your cause? > >> >> Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc >> when a user has . on his path. > > Context TomB me old mate. You're doing a Creepy. > >> >> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and >> mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even >> in the repositories themselves! > > No. What I said was that mixing the has been known to break systems. It > did mine and it did others. I even provided you links. YOU made some > silly claims about them being identical. They are not. And by Debian > folks I mentioned #Debian not the debian developers per se. A LOT will > still deny this but the evidence is over whelming. It hasnt happened in > a while and maybe the issues are totally fixed. Time will tell. > >> >> Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on >> their extension. > > Executed *based* on their file extensions moron. You really dont think I > think adding a file extension suddenly means you can type its name at > the bash cli and it magically runs do you? This type of silly pretence > to get one over shows you to be a lame wanker. Obviously talking about > file managers etc and file association. You really do like making a fool > of yourself. > > I also showed how you can "execute" a file WITHOUT it being set - its as > simple as "sh file.sh". Now, stop being such a dumbarse. You're > embarassing yourself and clutching at straws. > > Only recently an article was posted which pretty much repeated what *I* > told you ages ago : how to hack a Linux system when the use is a > dumbarse. You dont need root to get info. The uses info is in his $HOME > most of the time and NOT wrapped up a a .gpg or something similar. > >> >> And so on. >> >> Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified from >> you there! > > Serious Q : what above do you find "anti Linux"? YOu really are like > your hero Creepy. Try reading and understanding for a change. > > You listed some off the ocuff comments that I made to correct the > clueless fanbois. I stand by each and every one above. Yet you didnt > list me waxing lyrical about emacs, gnus, debian, rsync, rsnapshot, ssh, > gnupg, liquorix etc etc. Why is that? Oh yes. You're a dick. > > YOU are the one that was claiming to keep a root window open all the > time, you are the one who didnt know the difference between ./configure > and configure. You are the one who downloads and builds as root. You're > an idiot at times. A shame. You could be so much more honest and less of > a fanboi. Why not try it. Ain't it hysterical watching the Linturds circling the wagons around one of their own Chris Ahlstrom? I do!!! The Linux vermin come crawling out of the woodwork like roaches! -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Linux's dismal desktop market share: http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html Desktop Linux on Life Support: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v93cv6hp9qshitutcc7j8opof9sorer9u0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32458 |
TomB wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from >> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted. AHHAHAHHAHHAAAHAHAHAHAA >Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the >GPL. > >Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been >deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. > >Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc >when a user has . on his path. > >Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and >mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even >in the repositories themselves! > >Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on >their extension. > >And so on. > >Yes, some very good pro Linux and OSS post that can be verified from >you there! Not to mention his absolute *contempt* for all the principles of Free software. An M$ shill all the way. -- "Until Linux has a REASON for people to dump Windows they won't" - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2hk4cqmlyb.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32420 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 6/12/2011 5:09 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> Crybaby Chris Ahlstrom is once again accusing me of cherry picking bad >> Linux posts, as if one has to try hard to find them..hahaha... >> >> >> He posted a new thread entitled :"[Troll] Yet another anti-Linux rant >> cherry-picked by Flounder" >> >> Well Chris Ahlstrom, guess where I got the orginal post entitled: >> >> "The Linux desktop experience is killing Linux on the desktop." ???? >> >> Hmmmm, Liarmutt? >> >> RIGHT FROM YOUR FORMER MASTER Roy Schestowitz!!! >> >> http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/irc-log-techrights-11062011.html >> >> TRIdentica/#techrights-[noyesk/@noyesk] The Linux desktop experience is >> killing #Linux on the desktop http://bit.ly/kuKmbl Jun 11 15:55 >> >> TechrightsBot-tr Title: (think) - The Linux desktop experience is >> killing Linux on the desktop .::. Size~: 21.04 KB Jun 11 15:55 >> >> >> ...All done manually of course :) >> >> Consider yourself Rope-A-Doped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 >> >> I'm beginning to agree with Tom Shelton.... >> This is just too easy... > > Nice little KO, Flattie! > > Fact is, it's harder to cherry-pick GOOD Linux posts than bad ones... I feel sorry for Creepy at this stage. He has the memory of a goldfish. In fact, didnt he deny boasting about his Windows related income here only to have the link provided? Strangely enough, every post he makes accusing you or me of lying he has yet to provide a single link proving that. Sad? You make up your own mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web