Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18067 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 236 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Robin T Cox <nomai@nomail.net> - 2011-04-24 05:30 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 13:29 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:50 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 18:14 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:49 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:01 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 06:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:58 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:43 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 17:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 23:17 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:31 -0400
What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 03:23 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:24 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:38 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 22:25 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 18:46 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 22:14 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 05:49 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 21:42 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:09 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:18 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:44 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 21:51 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:16 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 22:21 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 17:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:36 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:39 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:04 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:36 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 11:37 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:43 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:44 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 09:26 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 18:59 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:01 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-28 08:37 -0700
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:42 +0200
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:22 +0100
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 16:03 -0400
Re: What fonts are we? (was Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 15:37 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 20:33 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:15 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:10 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 07:29 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:05 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Rob <me@privacy.net> - 2011-04-24 10:33 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 13:53 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 18:57 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-24 11:32 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 20:19 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:06 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 14:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-24 21:27 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:33 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-24 20:52 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:05 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 05:32 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 01:38 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 11:00 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:33 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:45 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:31 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 20:52 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:33 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 17:50 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-25 13:00 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 18:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 16:09 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-25 16:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:25 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:13 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-26 04:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:57 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 17:30 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 23:03 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 09:41 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 10:46 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:13 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-27 18:43 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:44 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 01:34 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 01:45 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 03:31 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 04:09 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-28 04:35 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:35 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:13 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-27 02:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-27 06:21 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 09:26 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 17:11 +0200
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 16:41 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-28 13:00 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-28 19:07 +0100
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-29 06:30 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:16 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 08:23 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:49 -0400
Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:38 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:46 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 12:54 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:28 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:05 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:07 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:20 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:34 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:33 +0100
"Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:14 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:24 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400
Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400
The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500
Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400
Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400
"Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400
"Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:13 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 16:19 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 16:32 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:06 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:12 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:39 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:42 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:44 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:48 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:52 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:56 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 19:42 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 19:43 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:10 +0200
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 12:26 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 12:25 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:34 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-04-29 05:16 +0000
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 17:46 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-28 11:57 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 11:09 -0500
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 12:14 -0400
Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> - 2011-04-28 12:23 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 11:03 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:16 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:25 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:37 -0400
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 13:57 -0500
Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:07 -0400
Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 16:19 -0400
"Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 12:22 -0500
Re: "Ezekiel": desperation meets idiocy "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:33 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:46 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 18:21 +0100
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" ignores my rebuttals stukie <stukieh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 23:41 +0000
Re: Lying asshole "Ezekiel" displays his hypocrisy again flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:44 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:28 +0200
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:22 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 14:47 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 14:58 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-26 15:28 -0400
[Troll] Laying down with pigs... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 16:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 16:21 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-27 10:28 -0500
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-27 16:30 +0100
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-27 23:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-28 09:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] Laying down with pigs (chrisv's wife)... "global warming" <hot@nospam.com> - 2011-04-27 11:36 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:48 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:50 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 15:01 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 09:32 -0500
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 10:51 -0400
Re: chrisv turd - I'll make this real easy. (was: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:20 -0500
[Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 06:20 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 11:54 +0100
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 08:10 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:11 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 14:53 +0200
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-26 14:12 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 08:12 -0500
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-26 09:34 -0400
Re: [Troll] "Hadron" calls others to task.... LMAO "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:20 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-04-27 20:43 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 20:48 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-27 20:51 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win "Ezekiel" <Me@Not-there.com> - 2011-04-27 21:23 -0400
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-28 07:35 -0500
Re: Ubuntu Linux boosted by 10,000 seat PC win DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-28 10:50 -0400
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel" continues LIE without shame. |
| Message-ID | <eeedf9rs6zy6$.1eqcvbl8079mp.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18724 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:24:11 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > chrisv wrote: > >> Ezekiel wrote: >> >>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>news:m2tdr61lsv8a1isag0m7in1ul3b7fmoc1f@4ax.com... >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>>Ezekiel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>chrisv is constantly saying how the trolls are attacking the decent and >>>>>>honest advocates. >>>>> >>>>>Yep. >>>>> >>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig. >>>>> >>>>>Evidence has been presented. >>> >>>Another LIE. >> >> On your part, "Ezekiel". > > Yes, methinks she doth protest too much. > > <snip> Me thinks you got slammed by both DFS and Zeke. Your comment is the typical Linux advocate excuse when people point out your lies. -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <ip6vau$eg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18713 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com...
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>>
>>>>Evidence has been presented.
>> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>
> Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
>
> You fscking *hypocrite*.
>
Here's how things work retard - you made a claim ("Evidence has been
presented").
It's not my job to prove that "evidence has not been presented." The person
who made the claim (that's you turd) is the one who needs to prove his or
her claim.
Even a completely clueless piece of shit liar like you might have the
required dozen or so braincells to figure this out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: (buh-bye turd) I thought that even a turd like "chrisv" couldn't possibly be this stupid.... |
| Message-ID | <ip6vhj$3o2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18725 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> wrote in message
news:ip6vau$eg$1@dont-email.me...
>
> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:0vtdr6hso8jjgbj18d1eie25ljm3m4afgg@4ax.com...
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Simply show some proof that Hadron is Larry Qualig.
>>>>>
>>>>>Evidence has been presented.
>>> Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
>
>>
>> Prove that evidence has not been presented. Ever.
>>
>> You fscking *hypocrite*.
>>
>
> Here's how things work retard - you made a claim ("Evidence has been
> presented").
>
> It's not my job to prove that "evidence has not been presented." The
> person who made the claim (that's you turd) is the one who needs to prove
> his or her claim.
>
> Even a completely clueless piece of shit liar like you might have the
> required dozen or so braincells to figure this out.
>
>
And one last thing.... Buh-bye turd. This latest post of yours ("prove that
evidence has not been presented") demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt
how fscking stupid you are.
Thanks for reminding me again why there is no need to waste my time with
someone as ridiculously stupid as you. I'll continue to avoid you the same
way that I avoid a steaming pile of dog-shit on the sidewalk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 13:26 -0500 |
| Subject | The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <e03er6d1g083015m6tbe5i7m2pst68nb8t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18729 |
Ezekiel wrote:
>And one last thing.... Buh-bye turd. This latest post of yours ("prove that
>evidence has not been presented") demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt
>how fscking stupid you are.
Nope. You are lying *again*, "Ezekiel".
My giving you a taste of your own medicine "demonstrates" nothing of
the kind, fsckwit.
You *leap* to calling me a "liar" for saying "evidence has been
presented", something which I know as well as I know my name is a
*fact*.
What was quite-nicely demonstrated is your massive hypocrisy -
demanding that I prove something but refusing to prove your charges.
>Thanks for reminding me again why there is no need to waste my time with
>someone as ridiculously stupid as you. I'll continue to avoid you the same
>way that I avoid a steaming pile of dog-shit on the sidewalk.
You really should avoid me.
All you succeed doing, when you go up against me, is show what a piece
of shit liar and hyopocrite you are.
I think Larry is "Hadron". That's a *fact*.
I have presented and discussed evidence as to why I think Larry is
"Hadron". That is also a *fact*.
I've been *completely* honest, here. *Period*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <ip73ne$gf6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #18753 |
useless piece of shit "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:e03er6d1g083015m6tbe5i7m2pst68nb8t@4ax.com... more documented lies from the dumbest piece of shit on the planet. "chrisv" is a documented liar. "chrisv" is a dumb piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 14:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <1lonyv0wwjtbq$.1jx84cy1mi32b.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18753 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:26:58 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>And one last thing.... Buh-bye turd. This latest post of yours ("prove that
>>evidence has not been presented") demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt
>>how fscking stupid you are.
>
> Nope. You are lying *again*, "Ezekiel".
I don't see Zeke running away.
What I see is you starting one new attack thread after another and not
getting backed up by the clan except for Willy Poaster who has already
been discredited as a liar.
--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 15:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <ip757d$958$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #18792 |
"flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message
news:1lonyv0wwjtbq$.1jx84cy1mi32b.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:26:58 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>And one last thing.... Buh-bye turd. This latest post of yours ("prove
>>>that
>>>evidence has not been presented") demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt
>>>how fscking stupid you are.
>>
>> Nope. You are lying *again*, "Ezekiel".
>
> I don't see Zeke running away.
> What I see is you starting one new attack thread after another and not
> getting backed up by the clan except for Willy Poaster who has already
> been discredited as a liar.
>
I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
not been presented - ever."
I'm going to "run away" the same way that I "run away" when I see a pile of
dog shit on the sidewalk. I'm going to "run away" by not stepping in the
shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 15:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <1phvlcljp85ro$.1ndfcm4txoxj4$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #18798 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:08:28 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message
> news:1lonyv0wwjtbq$.1jx84cy1mi32b.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:26:58 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>>And one last thing.... Buh-bye turd. This latest post of yours ("prove
>>>>that
>>>>evidence has not been presented") demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt
>>>>how fscking stupid you are.
>>>
>>> Nope. You are lying *again*, "Ezekiel".
>>
>> I don't see Zeke running away.
>> What I see is you starting one new attack thread after another and not
>> getting backed up by the clan except for Willy Poaster who has already
>> been discredited as a liar.
>>
>
> I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
> make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
> with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
> then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
> not been presented - ever."
>
> I'm going to "run away" the same way that I "run away" when I see a pile of
> dog shit on the sidewalk. I'm going to "run away" by not stepping in the
> shit.
I don't blame you.
With these loons you're dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.
If you fight back they claim you protest too much so you must be lying.
If you ignore them, their lies stand as truth.
What a pack of sick puppies.
--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 15:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <269er6lrgupvqi1cfokqsmdtb4hhs30qsm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18798 |
Ezekiel wrote:
>I'm done with this.
You've certainly provided plenty more (redundant) evidence that you
are a piece of shit liar, "Ezekiel".
"He can't prove that he has presented evidence in the past. Therefore
he is a proven liar."
*Guffaw*
Bottom line: I've been *completely* honest, in here, while "Ezekiel"
is a piece of shit liar who lied, lied, and lied some more.
Poor "Ezekiel".
>Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
>not been presented - ever."
You didn't like that taste of your own medicine, did you, fsckwit?
>I'm going to "run away" the same way that I "run away" when I see a pile of
>dog shit on the sidewalk. I'm going to "run away" by not stepping in the
>shit.
You will never beat me with your lies, "Ezekiel". You POS.
Fact: I think Larry is "Hadron".
Fact: Evidence has been presented that Larry is "Hadron".
No lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-26 15:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The piece of shit liar "Ezekiel" runs away again |
| Message-ID | <9l9er6thhdmbkj8nu3c02nqgn40olnq6vm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18798 |
Ezekiel wrote: >I'm done with this. Hey, "Ezekiel", I drove my car yesterday. Can I prove it? No! *Guffaw* you lying piece of shit. Sheesh, as if Google Group's search is reliable for *anything*, much less something subtle like a discussion of why we might thing Larry is "Hadron". I didn't even try. I know the truth. I told the truth. "Ezekiel" is a bald-faced liar. Proven and documented. All he can "document" from me is that I don't think I can prove my claim, or at least I don't think it's worth the effort.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 09:00 -0500 |
| Subject | "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <39rir69r7g72mj3g99u1hhs4l1m57jvtq7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #18798 |
Ezekiel wrote:
>I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
>not been presented - ever."
A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
See, if *someone else* claims that you did something, and you know
it's not true, it is *right* to call them a liar and demand proof of
their claim. You *know* that they lied, and that's all you need to
rightfully call them a liar.
On the other hand, if you claim that *you yourself* did something, it
is *not* right for someone else to call you a liar, unless they are
absolutely *certain* that you have not done what you have claimed.
In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling fsckwit to
know that I did not do as I had claimed. There is *no possible way*
for him to prove that I did not do as I had claimed.
You see, "Ezekiel", I *knew* the impossibility of what I asked you do.
I *knew* that you, through your idiocy and your lies, had put yourself
into an indefensible position. *That was my point*
You have been *spanked*, "Ezekiel". You have been *slam-dunked*. Get
it?
Of course, you were too fscking *stupid* to understand any of this.
So, what did you do? You lashed-out, claiming that I am a "moron"
with whom it is not possible to have a rational argument. Oh, the
irony.
You see, "Ezekiel", when I claim that I've handed you your ass, it's
no idle boast. It's the truth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 10:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <huk16cb7spbq.1k0nmyvs9e08j$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #19496 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:00:25 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>>I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
>>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
>>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented") and
>>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence has
>>not been presented - ever."
>
> A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
> argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
> that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
Why do you lie so much chrisv?
You have proven nothing other than the fact you are an idiot.
Your made up "facts" mean zero except when they are precisely what the
COLA cabal wants to hear and then they are of course completely
"factual".
The more you squawk and start new threads attacking Zeke, the more
ignorant you look.
If that's even possible.
--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 10:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: chrisv's complete stupidity, documented |
| Message-ID | <ipbtob$8l2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19497 |
"flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message
news:huk16cb7spbq.1k0nmyvs9e08j$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:00:25 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>I'm done with this. Wasting my time arguing with that moron would almost
>>>make me as stupid as he is. How can you possible have a rational argument
>>>with someone who makes a claim ("evidence has already been presented")
>>>and
>>>then when you ask to see this evidence they reply - "Prove that evidence
>>>has
>>>not been presented - ever."
>>
>> A much better question is "How can you possibly have a rational
>> argument with someone who calls you a 'proven liar' over something
>> that he cannot *possibly* know, much less prove?"
>> In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling
>> fsckwit to know that I did not do as I had claimed. There
>> is *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do
>> as I had claimed.
> Why do you lie so much chrisv?
>
The turd really is dumber than shit and proves it here again. Look at all
the double-negatives in *his* last paragraph:
- "there is *no possible way* ... to know that I did not do as I had
claimed... *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do as I had
claimed."
'No way to not know what not possibly he did not do.' - What the FSCK does
this even mean?
If the only way turd can attempt to salvage his LIES is with this ridiculous
nonsense then it shows what a shameless LIAR he is.
(chrisv turd) - "Evidence has been presented." (that HQ = LQ)
(Zeke) - Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented?
That's ALL there is to it. Not a bunch of twisted bullshit about 'No way to
not know what not possibly did not do.'
It is VERY SIMPLE - turd made a claim. Now backup the claim without doing a
word-jumble.
--- "Prove that evidence has not been presented - ever."
This is the beginning of the word twisting in order to sleaze out of his
lies. It's the same "you can't prove something never happened" logic as:
Hey chrisv turd - You once posted that you like to suck horse dick. Now
Prove that you never posted this - ever.
> You have proven nothing other than the fact you are an idiot.
>
He really is the dumbest of the dumb. Notice how other advocates have enough
brains and common sense to avoid him in this thread.
>
> The more you squawk and start new threads attacking Zeke, the more
> ignorant you look.
> If that's even possible.
>
He's like a helpless little 3-lb pocket dog that does nothing but yelp and
screech. He thinks he's hot shit but the rest of the world see's him as the
pathetic little joke he is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 10:20 -0500 |
| Subject | "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <42vir6dhdg736ph3agidd4s3iqctnsp7ds@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #19504 |
Ezekiel wrote: >The turd really is dumber than shit and proves it here again. Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". >Look at all >the double-negatives in *his* last paragraph: > >- "there is *no possible way* ... to know that I did not do as I had >claimed... *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do as I had >claimed." What, are you a child with a reading disability? Did I type too fast for you? Do you think you're fooling anyone who has a brain? There is *nothing* wrong with those statements. There is *no possible way* for you to know that I did not do as I claimed, therefore you had *no* right to call me a "liar" about it. Is this *really* so difficult for you to understand, you fsckwitted asshole? >'No way to not know what not possibly he did not do.' - What the FSCK does >this even mean? Exactly what they say, you *stupid* asshole. The illogic is *all yours*, as I have pointed out. *You* claimed that I was lying when there was *no way* for you to know so, much less prove so. The impossibility of your predicament is *your problem*, fsckwit! >If the only way turd can attempt to salvage his LIES is with this ridiculous >nonsense then it shows what a shameless LIAR he is. Poor "Ezekiel". You're not fooling anyone with your filthy lies. What about my challenge, you chicken-shit asshole? >(chrisv turd) - "Evidence has been presented." (that HQ = LQ) >(Zeke) - Where exactly is this "evidence" that's been presented? > > >That's ALL there is to it. Not a bunch of twisted bullshit about 'No way to >not know what not possibly did not do.' > >It is VERY SIMPLE - turd made a claim. Now backup the claim without doing a >word-jumble. Poor "Ezekiel". You're not fooling anyone with your filthy lies. What about my challenge, you chicken-shit asshole? MAKE IT WORTH MY WHILE, YOU FSCKING COWARD. And no, I did *not* move the goal-posts, in my challenge. >--- "Prove that evidence has not been presented - ever." > >This is the beginning of the word twisting Translation, "this is where chrisv showed what a stupid POS Ezekiel is" >in order to sleaze out of his lies. But I have not lied, you fscking liar. I'll go through the effort of proving it, if you make it worth my while, you fsckinig coward. > It's the same "you can't prove something never happened" logic as: Nope. You are wrong. It's not the same, as I have already explained. You are flaunting your inability to think logically, Mr "Developer". You had *no* reason to claim that I had lied. *Zero* evidence. > Hey chrisv turd - You once posted that you like to suck horse dick. Now >Prove that you never posted this - ever. LOL Go back and read my previous post, for a logic lesson, you POS. In such a case, it is *right* for me to call you a liar and demand proof, because I am ****certain**** that you are lying. I ****know**** that you are lying. *Try* to understand the importance of being *certain* that someone is lying, before calling them a "liar", you *stupid* fscking *asshole*. Sheesh! This guys just keeps embarrassing himself more and more! (Which is why this is so much fun.) >He really is the dumbest of the dumb. Notice how other advocates have enough >brains and common sense to avoid him in this thread. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". You have *no way* of knowing why they are avoiding this thread. Naturally, the lying POS that you are, you assume and assert that it's because they think I'm in the wrong. *Guffaw* Most likely, they simply don't want to be involved in my slapping you all over USENET. >He's like a helpless little 3-lb pocket dog that does nothing but yelp and >screech. He thinks he's hot shit but the rest of the world see's him as the >pathetic little joke he is. I love the "he thinks he's hot shit" from "Mr Developer" "Ezekiel". LOL You can't make this shit up! The irony! At least you have "Flatfish" and "OSOK" on your side, "Ezekiel" :-D
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 16:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <6hdo88-5ta.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #19530 |
chrisv wrote: <snip> > I love the "he thinks he's hot shit" from "Mr Developer" "Ezekiel". > > LOL You can't make this shit up! The irony! > > At least you have "Flatfish" and "OSOK" on your side, "Ezekiel" :-D He rants & froths like the M$ Hadron zealot. And like him, Zeke's useless at using a Google search too. -- "!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW" "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 10:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <ip1jr6t9j629an76hgsbp03ljtkef897l0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #19530 |
> "Ezekiel" wrote: >> >>'No way to not know what not possibly he did not do.' - What the FSCK does >>this even mean? I just noticed this complete *lie* regarding what I wrote. What I actually wrote was: "In this case, there is *no possible way* for the trolling fsckwit to know that I did not do as I had claimed." What I wrote is clear and correct, for anyone who is not a complete fscking idiot (which, in his defense, "Ezekiel" is). But why did he *lie* about what I wrote? Another "Ezekiel" bald-faced lie. Documented. What a blatantly dishonest POS, this "Ezekiel" is!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "meteor" <meteor@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 12:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel's" spanking, documented |
| Message-ID | <ipc4c0$3je$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #19534 |
documented liar "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:ip1jr6t9j629an76hgsbp03ljtkef897l0@4ax.com... more DOCUMENTED lies from the useless piece of shit. "chrisv" is a documented liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "chrisv" - a WORLD CLASS IDIOT. |
| Message-ID | <ipc202$o0f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #19530 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:42vir6dhdg736ph3agidd4s3iqctnsp7ds@4ax.com... > Ezekiel wrote: > >>The turd really is dumber than shit and proves it here again. > > Nope. You are lying again, "Ezekiel". > >>Look at all >>the double-negatives in *his* last paragraph: >> >>- "there is *no possible way* ... to know that I did not do as I had >>claimed... *no possible way* for him to prove that I did not do as I had >>claimed." > > What, are you a child with a reading disability? Did I type too fast > for you? Do you think you're fooling anyone who has a brain? > > There is *nothing* wrong with those statements. > > There is *no possible way* for you to know that I did not do as I > claimed, therefore you had *no* right to call me a "liar" about it. > > Is this *really* so difficult for you to understand, you fsckwitted > asshole? > It's very simple turd. *You* made a claim. *You* backup your claim. The burden of proof is not on me to prove that you never didn't not post evidence. (or whatever the fsck you're trying to twist this into.) You either backup *your* claim or keep running and twisting like the piece of shit liar that you are. I'm done here. There is no point in further wasting my time on a idiot like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 11:19 -0500 |
| Subject | "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward |
| Message-ID | <jd4jr6l1ft409lecl799qcrd3asor69kjg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #19544 |
"Ezekiel" wrote: > (snip ranting to divert attention from his cowardice, not to mention lie after lie after lie) Your massive snip/ignore of the points I've made has been noted, "Ezekiel". All you have been doing lately is repeating yourself. It's very simple fsckwit. *You* made a claim that I lied. *You* backup your claim. The burden of proof is on you. The impossibility of your this is *your problem*, fsckwit! *You* made your own predicament, with your idiocy and your lies. You either backup *your* claim or keep running and twisting like the piece of shit liar that you are. Or: TAKE ME UP ON MY CHALLENGE, YOU FSCKING COWARD. > I'm done here. Look at "Ezekiel" run! LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 12:22 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Ezekiel" : chicken-shit coward |
| Message-ID | <1qarz9lhrqhns.qj2xe5mz4z1v$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #19559 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:19:59 -0500, chrisv wrote: > "Ezekiel" wrote: > >> (snip ranting to divert attention from his cowardice, not to mention lie after lie after lie) > > Your massive snip/ignore of the points I've made has been noted, > "Ezekiel". All you have been doing lately is repeating yourself. That's what you keep doing chrisv. > It's very simple fsckwit. *You* made a claim that I lied. *You* > backup your claim. The burden of proof is on you. Nice try chrisv, but you were the first one to accuse Zeke. It's up to *you* to prove that claim and until you *do* prove that claim, everything else you blabber isn't worth a hill of beans. > Look at "Ezekiel" run! LOL He doesn't have to do a thing. You made the initial accusations so it's up to you to prove them. Until you can, you are considered to be lying. There isn't anymore to it. -- flatfish+++ Please visit our hall of Linux idiots. http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/ Watching Linux Fail: http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/ Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead "By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory." http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web